![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why, would a 16" lx200 be stingy in its color delivery vs. a 17" f/4.5
Coulter (which is great) ? Is there something about the sct design which inherently retracts colour delivery vs say larger refractors, newts, and maksutovs. Several have suggested its the size of the sct at question, ie. too much light overpowering/fading colour. However an even larger 17.5 Coulter newt and two larger dob newts to 24" all deliver fabulous colour rendition in fact these larger newts are the prefered colour delivery scopes we have, vs the 16" lx200, an old C16, and even the 12-10" scts we use reguarly. Nobody disputes refractors being superior colour delivery systems. I have a feeling this involves contrast in optical systems? Any comments would be welcome. Jerry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SCTs are dying ... | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 38 | May 30th 05 06:55 PM |
Problem with SCTs versus pure mirror systems | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 76 | February 21st 04 01:56 AM |
The Colour of the Young Universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 19th 03 05:48 PM |
Quick drive-by question Photo "imaging" | ghost | Misc | 2 | November 27th 03 10:48 AM |
Telescope device to combine all spectrums of light. | Bill Nunnelee | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | September 1st 03 02:24 PM |