Schirra and Scott Grissom

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:37:27 -0400, "Terrell Miller"
wrote:

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
. com...

...No. You blew any chance of that happening when you started all this
crap. Find it yourself, if you're such a research expert as you claim.

Sounds to me like you don't know where it is (See, two can play that game.) :-)

...but only one can win. Hope you're gracious in defeat, sweetie.

....And, as befitting the victor, I intend to salt the lands of the
defeated so that their soil can never feed them again, thus leading to
the end of their nation for all time.

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

Hop David wrote:

The signal to noise ratio just went way down.

If she's a troll, killfile her and be done with it.


Sound advice if I ever heard it...consider it done.

Pat

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote
in message . ..
On 6 Jun 2004 10:24:27 -0700, (LaDonna Wyss)
wrote:

I've been scanning through three years of banter between Scott and all
of you, and I have yet to find the original statement Scott made about
Schirra. Obviously I'm not putting the right words in the search
engine; I've tried all combinations of Apollo One, Scott Grissom,
Schirra, and sabotage. Would somebody just post the reference,
please? Thank you.

...No. You blew any chance of that happening when you started all this
crap. Find it yourself, if you're such a research expert as you claim.

OM

Sounds to me like you don't know where it is (See, two can play that
game.) :-)

Sounds to me like you're trying to get others to do your homework for you.
If you hadn't arrived here with an attitude, and insisted on keeping an
attitude, you'd probably have the answer by now.

Fix yourself first.

OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message . ..
On 6 Jun 2004 13:50:09 -0700, (LaDonna Wyss)
wrote:

Apparently you don't read very well. I did so early this morning
before I even had coffee.

...Nope. Nothing there but your usual rhetoric. Lying through your
tooth like the trailer trash troll you are.

OM

I repeat: You don't read. I posted a list of lies made before
Congress yesterday morning. If you're not going to read, shut up.

On 7 Jun 2004 06:25:16 -0700, (LaDonna Wyss)
wrote:

I repeat: You don't read. I posted a list of lies made before
Congress yesterday morning. If you're not going to read, shut up.

....So, did anyone else see this posting? If it had been posted, it
would have been disected and ripped to shreds by now.

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

Pat Flannery wrote in message ...
Hop David wrote:

The signal to noise ratio just went way down.

If she's a troll, killfile her and be done with it.


Sound advice if I ever heard it...consider it done.

Pat

If that is "sound advice" to you, Pat, you need new advisors.

OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org
wrote:

On 7 Jun 2004 06:25:16 -0700, (LaDonna Wyss)
wrote:

I repeat: You don't read. I posted a list of lies made before
Congress yesterday morning. If you're not going to read, shut up.

...So, did anyone else see this posting? If it had been posted, it
would have been disected and ripped to shreds by now.

Yep, it's been dissected and/or commented on by several people,
including myself. LaDonna hasn't deigned to adress them.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ma...net.com&rnum=1
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message ...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
Just what do you want by showing up here? It's clear you have no
interest in
any serious investigation of the Apollo 1 events, because if you did,
you'd
be providing some verifiable evidence. So far, all you've done is talk
about
the evidence you've uncovered. That's heresay. Why not provide the
actual
evidence? Just what do you want?

Note that she completely avoided answering any question.

I posted it. Why don't you try reading something besides your own diatribes, guys?

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
Just what do you want by showing up here? It's clear you have no
interest in
any serious investigation of the Apollo 1 events, because if you
did,
you'd
be providing some verifiable evidence. So far, all you've done is
talk
about
the evidence you've uncovered. That's heresay. Why not provide the
actual
evidence? Just what do you want?

Note that she completely avoided answering any question.

I posted it.

What you *didn't* post, however, was an answer to my question. Just what do
you want here?

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
Pat Flannery wrote in message
...
Hop David wrote:

The signal to noise ratio just went way down.

If she's a troll, killfile her and be done with it.


Sound advice if I ever heard it...consider it done.

Pat

If that is "sound advice" to you, Pat, you need new advisors.

He has the Fire Women.