Burnt Barbecue (Texas-Style)

In article ,
(Jon Berndt) wrote:

"John Maxson" wrote in message news:bjdp90

From: john_thomas_maxson )
Subject: A Challenge to Jon Berndt
Date: 2002-05-05 07:55:55 PST

Jon, you've made many claims about your prowess in simulation.

I just found out today that the open source FlightGear flight
simulator was featured in comparison with X-Plane and MS Flight
Simulator in the April 2003 issue of Sport Aviation magazine
(http://www.eaa.org/benefits/sportaviation/). The flight dynamics
model that I have lead the development of over the past four years in
my spare time (JSBSim) was discussed as well. JSBSim is one of a few
flight dynamics models that can drive FlightGear - JSBSim is the
default. A few more users are listed he
http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/users.html.

JSB

And JTM wants to argue with ASCII stick figures . . .So tell us again,
JTM, why you can't provide mathematical analysis of SRB motions using
rates, nozzle gimbal, and chamber pressure telemtry and knowing the
masses and dimensions of the SRBs? Jon did it.

Why can't you?

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
"Heisenberg might have been here."
~ Anonymous

"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
...

And JTM wants to argue with ASCII stick figures . . .So tell us again,
JTM, why you can't provide mathematical analysis of SRB motions using
rates, nozzle gimbal, and chamber pressure telemtry and knowing the
masses and dimensions of the SRBs? Jon did it.

Why can't you?

Simply because John Maxson is a nutcase. You expect sanity from someone
who's employer gave him an ultermatum of psych test or take-a-walk?

--
Alan Erskine
alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au
Where are the Weapons of Mass
Destruction, Mr Bush?

In article ,
"Alan Erskine" wrote:

"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
...

And JTM wants to argue with ASCII stick figures . . .So tell us again,
JTM, why you can't provide mathematical analysis of SRB motions using
rates, nozzle gimbal, and chamber pressure telemtry and knowing the
masses and dimensions of the SRBs? Jon did it.

Why can't you?

Simply because John Maxson is a nutcase. You expect sanity from someone
who's employer gave him an ultermatum of psych test or take-a-walk?

--
Alan Erskine
alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au
Where are the Weapons of Mass
Destruction, Mr Bush?



No, Alan. I don't expext sanity from him. I just want Stephen Stocker
and any other Maxson-sycophant to realize who it is they are lionizing.

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
"Heisenberg might have been here."
~ Anonymous

Herb Schaltegger wrote in message
...
"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
...

And JTM wants to argue with ASCII stick figures . . .So tell
us again, JTM, why you can't provide mathematical analysis
of SRB motions using rates, nozzle gimbal, and chamber
pressure telemtry and knowing the masses and dimensions of
the SRBs?

Berndt is talking about Star Trek while I'm talking about Pc, the Pc
he and Lockheed attorney Bill Rogers *never showed us* to prove
the origin and frequency of those black smoke puffs at lift-off.

I just want Stephen Stocker and any other Maxson-sycophant to
realize who it is they are lionizing.

That one's easy. Stephen has been lionizing Berndt and Balettie for
their USENET civility, while admitting that he is not qualified to judge
their level of what I will term launch-engineering civility/ethics/morals.

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)

In article , "John Maxson"
wrote:

Herb Schaltegger wrote in message
...
"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
...

And JTM wants to argue with ASCII stick figures . . .So tell
us again, JTM, why you can't provide mathematical analysis
of SRB motions using rates, nozzle gimbal, and chamber
pressure telemtry and knowing the masses and dimensions of
the SRBs?

Berndt is talking about Star Trek while I'm talking about Pc, the Pc
he and Lockheed attorney Bill Rogers *never showed us* to prove
the origin and frequency of those black smoke puffs at lift-off.


Uh, so the reason you won't provide ANY analysis to back up your
assertions is...?

Moe

"John Maxson" wrote in message ...

That one's easy. Stephen has been lionizing Berndt and Balettie for
their USENET civility, while admitting that he is not qualified to judge
their level of what I will term launch-engineering civility/ethics/morals.

At this point we'd settle for just civility.

. . .So tell
us again, JTM, why you can't provide mathematical analysis
of SRB motions using rates, nozzle gimbal, and chamber
pressure telemtry and knowing the masses and dimensions of
the SRBs?

Berndt is talking about Star Trek while I'm talking about Pc, the Pc
he and Lockheed attorney Bill Rogers *never showed us...

John Maxson
"However,
he will scrupulously avoid the evidence he cannot refute."