A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rules Set for $50 Million 'America's Space Prize'



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 10th 04, 01:41 PM
Space Cadet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rules Set for $50 Million 'America's Space Prize'

Hi All
Bigelow has set the rules for his $50 Million 'America's Space Prize'

http://www.space.com/spacenews/busin...ow_041108.html

he Rules:

1. The spacecraft must reach a minimum altitude of 400 kilometers
(approximately 250 miles);

2. The spacecraft must reach a minimum velocity sufficient to
complete two (2) full orbits at altitude before returning to Earth;

3. The spacecraft must carry no less than a crew of five (5)
people;

4. The spacecraft must dock or demonstrate its ability to dock with
a Bigelow Aerospace inflatable space habitat, and be capable of
remaining on station at least six (6) months;

5. The spacecraft must perform two (2) consecutive, safe and
successful orbital missions within a period of sixty (60) calendar
days, subject to Government regulations;

6. No more than twenty percent (20 percent) of the spacecraft may
be composed of expendable hardware;

7. The contestant must be domiciled in the United States of
America.

8. The contestant must have its principal place of business in the
United States of America.

9. The Competitor must not accept of utilize government development
funding related to this contest of any kind, nor shall there be any
government ownership of the competitor. Usin government test
facilities shall be permitted.

10. The spacecraft must complete its two (2) missions safely and
successfully, with all five (5) crew members aboard for the second
qualifying flight, before the competition's deadline of Jan. 10, 2010.

Rules 8 & 9 pretty much eliminate anyone out side of the US, of course
it is called 'America's Space Prize', but I think that is limiting it
too much.
What I wonder about is rule 6 is that a reasonible restriction for a
vehicle that is capable of going orbital? This seems to elimate the
idea of taking a Falcon V and sticking a capsule on top of it. I know
that they plan on making the first stage recoverable/reusable, don't
know about the 2nd stage, but would they have that feature available
by that time frame?
Comments anyone?


Just my $0.02

Space Cadet

derwetzelsDASHmailATyahooDOTcom

Moon Society - St. Louis Chapter

http://www.moonsociety.org/chapters/stlouis/

The Moon Society is a non-profit educational and
scientific foundation formed to further scientific
study and development of the moon.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Policy 145 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
Wednesday, Sep 29 -- the first SpaceShipOne flight in a two-part try at the X-Prize. Jim Oberg Policy 0 July 27th 04 10:09 PM
cheap access to space - majority opinion Cameron Dorrough Technology 15 June 27th 04 03:35 AM
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) Rand Simberg Space Science Misc 18 February 14th 04 03:28 AM
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 8 August 31st 03 02:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.