![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joshua Barney" wrote in message news:xIifd.315421
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: No, not only are we not a space faring nation, we are not a space faring world, and we are not a solar powered nation, neither are we a solar powered world. As not, the entire basis of human civilization is fraudulent and corrupt. Funny, I thought that basically all of the energy we use to survive does initially come from solar power, e.g. plants... ![]() ~ Joshua Solar power does provide the energy for potted plants. Conversely, the power for Mr. Elifritz' comment above is, I suspect, from planted pot. ;-) Jon |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
But where could NASA find such expertise? http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...u tput=gplain -george william herbert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
October 26, 2004
Joshua Barney wrote: Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: No, not only are we not a space faring nation, we are not a space faring world, and we are not a solar powered nation, neither are we a solar powered world. As not, the entire basis of human civilization is fraudulent and corrupt. Funny, I thought that basically all of the energy we use to survive does initially come from solar power, e.g. plants. Well that makes global extinction, global deforestation, global pollution, and global warming induced climate change perfectly ok then, after all, we are just burning and eroding away plant and animal remains. And it is perfectly ok to burn up in 100 years what took 100 million years for nature to create. http://www.geocities.com/sapphire2021/forest.html http://www.well.com/user/davidu/extinction.html You must be blind as well as daft then. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
You must be blind as well as daft then. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net Wow, you really don't have a sense of humor, do you? =P ~ Joshua |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
October 26, 2004
Joshua Barney wrote: You must be blind as well as daft then. Wow, you really don't have a sense of humor, do you? You haven't said anything funny yet. We are using oil to make fertilizers to feed the plants, and we are killing the soil bacteria with the fertilizers, washing away the soil with the resultant agricultural practices, and we have overpopulated the world with the resulting food, and are now totally dependent on that oil to distribute that food. It's a global oil for food program that has been occuring for the last 50 years now. Do you understand how fragile and unstable our civilization really is because of that? We are one step away from sharpening stainless steel spoons into arrowheads. You may think it's funny, but I don't. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
You haven't said anything funny yet. We are using oil to make fertilizers to feed the plants, Nitrogen fertilizer is made with hydrogen, actually(*). The hydrogen is currently mostly obtained from natural gas, but there's nothing essential about that. Paul (*) And nitrogen and oxygen from air, and in some cases CO2 (also from natural gas.) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
October 26, 2004
"Paul F. Dietz" wrote: You haven't said anything funny yet. We are using oil to make fertilizers to feed the plants, Nitrogen fertilizer is made with hydrogen, actually(*). The hydrogen is currently mostly obtained from natural gas, but there's nothing essential about that. (*) And nitrogen and oxygen from air, and in some cases CO2 (also from natural gas.) Almost a touche' but not quite. I said we are use oil *to* make fertilizer, but more generally, hydrocarbons, by burning them, for energy, to make fertilizers, deliver them, apply them, work the soil, harvest the crops, and deliver them to markets. We are still way over the top in terms of agricultural sustainability. http://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/...ria/haber.html http://home.alltel.net/bsundquist1/ Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:56:38 -0500, in a place far, far away, richard
schumacher made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: In article , (Martha H Adams) wrote: OK, there's a picture. So *why*? ?? Is America a space-faring culture and country? If it's not, then how would you make it one? Note from recent TV: America is the most Christian of all the industrialized countries. ...Could that tell you something? Yes, it says that in the US fear, superstition and tribalism have more importance relative to science and humane progressivism than they do in any other industrialized country. "Humane progressivism"? I just love these amusing caricatures of the US by people who are utterly clueless of it. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't disagree with that. Dr. Dryden, who received his PhD when he
was 20 (!), was to aeronautics what von Braun became to rocketry. He may have been the smartest person ever to cash a NASA paycheck. - Ed Kyle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon and Mars expeditions vs. RLV development | vthokie | Policy | 62 | March 30th 04 04:51 AM |
Pres. Kerry's NASA | ed kyle | Policy | 354 | March 11th 04 07:05 PM |
NASA Selects Explorer Mission Proposals For Feasibility Studies | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 4th 03 10:14 PM |
NASA Celebrates Educational Benefits of Earth Science Week | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 10th 03 04:14 PM |
NASA Keeps Watch Over Isabel, Captures Spectacular Images | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | September 16th 03 03:53 AM |