![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has been stated that there are no guidelines or plans with respect
to an 'over-the-side' or non-tethered EVA to inspect the RCC leading edge. But, given the ability of the Shuttle to very accurately manouvre itself, is an unthethered EVA really that much more dangerous than a regular EVA as it would seem? If an untethered astronaut were in the payload bay, could not the Shuttle handle navigating downwards, then backwards, then leftwards, then upwards, allowing close observation? And then performing these navigations in reverse, having the astronaut come back in contact with the payload bay? The concept of untethered EVA sound distressingly risky, but unless the Shuttle suffered a navigational thruster failure, it would essentially be no more complicated than an ISS docking, would it not? Thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Telescope Question | Niko Holm | Space Science Misc | 6 | December 13th 03 03:38 PM |
Another book question | Andrew Gray | Space Science Misc | 3 | November 6th 03 06:34 PM |
PRA - Public's Risk Assessment on Safety | Andrew Gray | Space Science Misc | 15 | August 26th 03 11:25 PM |
Question: Soyuz Descent Module Landing System | John Pelchat | Space Science Misc | 3 | August 22nd 03 08:30 AM |
To fly or not to fly? That is the question... | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 5th 03 07:47 AM |