![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lilian wrote:
I personally would not recommend any non GOTO scope to a begineer because you wlil never find anything. I'm sorry, Lilian -- you often write good stuff, but that comment is just *SO* wrong! Many of us began with non-GOTO scopes. I would suggest that someone who puts the money into decent optics, mount and atlas/guidebook has the potential to ultimately see a heck of a lot more with it that the person who sinks a good proportion into GOTO. Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My beginenrs approach to identifying stars was to set up my digital camera
on a tripod, and take a 15 second, point and wish, exposure of the night sky. I then loaded the pic on to my PC, opened up starry night , and compared the two. I now start at Orion (usually out the front window), spot Sirius below left, then look for Taurus off to the right of Orion, then over to the Pleides etc. I'm quite impressed now that I spot Jupiter, Mars and Saturn quite easily. I don't know how much of this I'd have gained with a GOTO scope - as it stands my diddy chrimbo present scope is so juddery most observing so far has been by eye anyway. My beginners spotting is limited to the south sky for the moment, mainly due to it being cold and a great view out of the front, south facing windows. Roll on the summer ! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:15:52 -0000, "Dr DNA"
wrote: My beginenrs approach to identifying stars was to set up my digital camera on a tripod, and take a 15 second, point and wish, exposure of the night sky. I then loaded the pic on to my PC, opened up starry night , and compared the two. I now start at Orion (usually out the front window), spot Sirius below left, then look for Taurus off to the right of Orion, then over to the Pleides etc. I'm quite impressed now that I spot Jupiter, Mars and Saturn quite easily. This is actually quite a nice way to learn star hopping in comfort. There's no doubt that you *do* start to recognise the star patterns when you scruitinise them in this way. They may not be exactly as you would see them in the flesh, so to speak, but it teaches you how to recognise patterns and use them to bridge areas between sections of the sky. The biggest problem is when the camera isn't quite as sensitive to certain colours. Hot-pixels could be an issue too. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Come and visit the "Lunar Parallax Demonstration Project" |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lilian" wrote in message ... You will pick up a good second-hand one at www.ukastroads.co.uk I personally would not recommend any non GOTO scope to a begineer because you wlil never find anything. I don't know about the ETX, but I have a Meade 4504 which is a GEM (German Equatorial Mount) Newtonian with GOTO. Aligning the scope well enough to get good & reliable results with GOTO is a real pain at the beginning of every session. If I felt that 'doing it right' depended on good GOTO then I'd have given up long ago. On the other hand, I really love the fact that the scope is motor driven and comes with the electronic controls in both axes to allow me to centre objects in the eyepiece with one hand. So I use Cartes de Ciel to locate objects worth looking at, print off a couple of charts at different scales to help with locating them and then use a combination of star hopping and random searches to find the objects. GOTO itself isn't necessary, but if it gives you full electronic slewing and tracking then its probably worth paying the extra. Owen By the way - the value/necessity of GOTO is one of the classic astro conflict areas. It's basically pointless trying to change anyone's mind on this point. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:09:34 -0000, "OG"
wrote: "Lilian" wrote in message ... You will pick up a good second-hand one at www.ukastroads.co.uk I personally would not recommend any non GOTO scope to a begineer because you wlil never find anything. Owen By the way - the value/necessity of GOTO is one of the classic astro conflict areas. It's basically pointless trying to change anyone's mind on this point. Agreed - each to his/her own. However, to make a statement that you will never find anything without GOTO is potentially misleading to those looking to purchase a new scope. It just isn't true. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Come and visit the "Lunar Parallax Demonstration Project" |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I make my comment based on what I hear from the members who come to our
Astronomy Group. Those without a GOTO scope find the moon, planets and maybe a couple of bright deep sky objects and then that is it. The telscope is then resigned to the cupboard! Yes, there are soe people who are willing to learn the stars etc, but from what I see of the newcomers to the hobby they are in the minority, people want a quick fix today. Yes you can get star charts out and learn the night sky, but its not that easy, especially with out light polluted skies. So I am merely setting a beginners expectation that *in my opionion* its much harder without a GOTO. That said, not every begineer can grasp how to use the GOTO either! Lilian |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lilian wrote:
So I am merely setting a beginners expectation that *in my opionion* its much harder without a GOTO. It may well be (I'll never know, since I began long before the days of GOTO), but that was not the statement that a few of us challenged. This is: I personally would not recommend any non GOTO scope to a begineer because you wlil never find anything. Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lilian" wrote in message ... Yes, there are soe people who are willing to learn the stars etc, but from what I see of the newcomers to the hobby they are in the minority, people want a quick fix today. Well, they will not get that from such a small 4" instrument. A 6" Dob for £300 is a good starter scope and will show a lot more. After all, what good is using Goto to find something if you see nothing? ;-))))) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Scope and a Re-visit the Astronomy Hobby | reconair | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 12th 04 08:36 AM |
Requirements / process to become a shuttle astronaut? | Dan Huizenga | Space Shuttle | 11 | November 14th 03 07:33 AM |
f/5 or f/8 newtonian? | Patrick | Amateur Astronomy | 52 | October 6th 03 12:46 AM |
New to hobby. Questions about mars..eyepieces..focusing..saturn..gps | Michael A. Covington | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 22nd 03 02:23 PM |
Spotting Scope or Binoculars? | John Honan | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | September 19th 03 05:17 PM |