Evidence for ancient Martian Pyramids

Ok I'm game. If we are so gullible then so are you. After all, you listen
to and follow your EXPERTS like a little puppy after a bitche's nipple.

You are a FOLLOWER just like the rest of us...another IMPERFECT Homo Sapiens
Sapiens...get used to it.

Damian

We all follow someone. I am the first the admit that I am probably the
biggest dumbass around, but at least I am a thinking dumbass.

DB wrote:

Ok I'm game. If we are so gullible then so are you. After all, you listen
to and follow your EXPERTS like a little puppy after a bitche's nipple.

You are a FOLLOWER just like the rest of us...another IMPERFECT Homo Sapiens
Sapiens...get used to it.

Damian

Fred Garvin wrote of himself:

Assclown alert!!!!!


It takes great self awareness as demonstrated by Fred to speak so highly
of himself.

Another dimwit with nothing to say wrote:

Peter Webb wrote:

"Mad Scientist" = half right



---

http://www.empire.net/~danp/Web_Files/Mars.htm

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:58:30 GMT, Mad Scientist
wrote:
I could learn more
from my dog farting.

Which explains where you get your "science".

--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

My my such a 'scientific' response there dumbass. No surprise, my dog
could write a scientific paper on the merits of why his barking sounds
smarter than you.

Wally Anglesea™ wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:58:30 GMT, Mad Scientist
wrote:

I could learn more

from my dog farting.

Which explains where you get your "science".

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
ogers.com...
Another dimwit with nothing to say wrote:

Peter Webb wrote:

"Mad Scientist" = half right



---

http://www.empire.net/~danp/Web_Files/Mars.htm


Because what you write is so ridiculuous as to be beneath comment for almost
everybody in this newsgroup.

However, here goes:

Evidence of ancient Martian life and civilization, now completely
destroyed proves that evolutionary and creationist theories need
rewriting. The Russians independently analysed data received on the
Martian surface and concluded that there is evidence of Pyramidal
structures or what has been called, non-natural landforms, all over the
place.

http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marsindx.htm
http://www.enterprisemission.com/
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com


You can believe either:

a) Mars has some triangular shaped hills on it, or
b) These hills are evidence of a billions of years old civilisation, which
by a remarkable co-incidence, so exactly paralleled the human civilisation
that occured billions of years later that they built exactly the same shaped
burial structures, and in another remarkable co-incidence, these are the
only constructions by these people that still remain.

You make your pick as to which is the simpler and (therefore by Occams
razor) the preferred explanantion.


Certainly we know that the evidence doesn't point to life as we know it
today. But that doesn't mean there wasn't life there perhaps 3 to 4
billion years ago. It has been theorized that Mars once had a hot and
humid climate around that time, and that water once existed in abundance
during the same period.


So of course there would be pyramids on Mars. I can now see exactly how that
follows.



If the Bible were the be-all and end-all of knowledge, clearly such a
civilizations existence and extinction would have been described in it.
And this also points to the almost complete lack of an historical
account of what exactly took place during the time of the great Flood.
Such a worldwide calamity which destroys nearly all of civilization and
all we have in the bible is a mere footnote seems patently ridiculous.

I am not suggesting that the Great Flood did not take place as we have a
mythological story based account of it in all cultures the world over.
What I am suggesting is that the Bible record is drastically incomplete.



And what are you suggesting? That the great flood of Noah occurred 4 billion
years ago on Mars, and the biblical record was a transcription of an alien
history textbook dug up in the deserts of the Middle East and translated
from Martian by Jewish scholars 2,000 years ago? Which means Noah was an
alien?

On second thought, don't tell me what you are suggesting. The trouble with
talking to crazies is that they are ... well ... crazy.

Peter Webb wrote:

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
ogers.com...

Another dimwit with nothing to say wrote:

Peter Webb wrote:


"Mad Scientist" = half right



---

http://www.empire.net/~danp/Web_Files/Mars.htm



Because what you write is so ridiculuous as to be beneath comment for almost
everybody in this newsgroup.

Sorry ass loser is all you can be.


However, here goes:


Evidence of ancient Martian life and civilization, now completely
destroyed proves that evolutionary and creationist theories need
rewriting. The Russians independently analysed data received on the
Martian surface and concluded that there is evidence of Pyramidal
structures or what has been called, non-natural landforms, all over the
place.

http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marsindx.htm
http://www.enterprisemission.com/
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com



You can believe either:

a) Mars has some triangular shaped hills on it,

Er, that would be *perfectly* triangled shaped hills. Dumbass.

or
b) These hills are evidence of a billions of years old civilisation, which
by a remarkable co-incidence, so exactly paralleled the human civilisation
that occured billions of years later that they built exactly the same shaped
burial structures, and in another remarkable co-incidence, these are the
only constructions by these people that still remain.


Whatever there jimbob. Don't quick your day job taking out the trash.

You make your pick as to which is the simpler and (therefore by Occams
razor) the preferred explanantion.



Certainly we know that the evidence doesn't point to life as we know it
today. But that doesn't mean there wasn't life there perhaps 3 to 4
billion years ago. It has been theorized that Mars once had a hot and
humid climate around that time, and that water once existed in abundance
during the same period.



So of course there would be pyramids on Mars. I can now see exactly how that
follows.



If the Bible were the be-all and end-all of knowledge, clearly such a
civilizations existence and extinction would have been described in it.
And this also points to the almost complete lack of an historical
account of what exactly took place during the time of the great Flood.
Such a worldwide calamity which destroys nearly all of civilization and
all we have in the bible is a mere footnote seems patently ridiculous.

I am not suggesting that the Great Flood did not take place as we have a
mythological story based account of it in all cultures the world over.
What I am suggesting is that the Bible record is drastically incomplete.




And what are you suggesting? That the great flood of Noah occurred 4 billion
years ago on Mars,

Hardly, that would be some folks at NASA who feel its ok to suggest that.

and the biblical record was a transcription of an alien
history textbook dug up in the deserts of the Middle East and translated
from Martian by Jewish scholars 2,000 years ago? Which means Noah was an
alien?

On second thought, don't tell me what you are suggesting. The trouble with
talking to crazies is that they are ... well ... crazy.

There there, can't help it when you cry so much. Perhaps we should wait
til the nurse gives you the pink Martian meds, and you've had your milk
and cookies and have changed into your jammies, and are all ready to be
tucked into bed.

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...
Evidence of ancient Martian life and civilization, now completely
::snip tripe::

OK...... so...... we know that throughout time there have always been people
you have fallen for bad ideas.
Gods, magic, esp, telekinesis, ufos, big foot, channeling, astrology, tarot,
perpetual motion machines, yogic flying, pyramid power, ancient aliens, a
6000 year old earth, atlantis, politicians, faith healers, meditation,
runes, numerology, alien abduction, bible codes, ghost orbs, crop circles,
magnetized water, programmed crystals, numerology, the easter bunny, dream
catchers, feng shui, homeopathy, psychic surgery, cloud ships, astral
projection, holy water, kabbalah, and finally, stepping on cracks in
sidewalks which as we all know, will most likely break your mother's back.

Now, here's my question:

To what evolutionary advantage does gullibility serve?
How does gullibility serve to advance the human race?

Our DNA apparently allows for this to occur in human brain function.
Much like unused organs in the human body, gullibility is still with us.

Of course animals do not show this trait, as far as we can tell.
Or has it been shown that gorillas have intentionally fooled other gorillas?

There must be a reason. I imagine this question has been asked before by
someone somewhere at sometime.

And a philosophical answer just won't cut it.

oh well. Kook-on you nut-bag.

-S

"Steven" wrote in message
...
"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...
Evidence of ancient Martian life and civilization, now completely
::snip tripe::

OK...... so...... we know that throughout time there have always been
people
you have fallen for bad ideas.
Gods, magic, esp, telekinesis, ufos, big foot, channeling, astrology,
tarot,
perpetual motion machines, yogic flying, pyramid power, ancient aliens, a
6000 year old earth, atlantis, politicians, faith healers, meditation,
runes, numerology, alien abduction, bible codes, ghost orbs, crop circles,
magnetized water, programmed crystals, numerology, the easter bunny, dream
catchers, feng shui, homeopathy, psychic surgery, cloud ships, astral
projection, holy water, kabbalah, and finally, stepping on cracks in
sidewalks which as we all know, will most likely break your mother's back.

Now, here's my question:

To what evolutionary advantage does gullibility serve?
How does gullibility serve to advance the human race?

Our DNA apparently allows for this to occur in human brain function.
Much like unused organs in the human body, gullibility is still with us.

Of course animals do not show this trait, as far as we can tell.
Or has it been shown that gorillas have intentionally fooled other
gorillas?

There must be a reason. I imagine this question has been asked before by
someone somewhere at sometime.

And a philosophical answer just won't cut it.

oh well. Kook-on you nut-bag.

-S



It provides no direct evolutionary advantage. It is a side effect - unwanted
noise - in the human ability to find patterns. By operating our inbuilt
pattern detector at its maximum sensitivity, we are less likely to miss
important patterns - like wildlife gathers around waterholes at night - but
more likely to get false positives - like the stuff you list above. The
gullible person is well fed (because he knows to hunt at waterholes at
night) but believes a whole lot of other incorrect stuff; the cynic doesn't
waste his time visiting the waterhole at night or sowing seeds only by the
light of a full moon, and so is more likely to starve.

OTOH, I don't know of any environmental advantage to total stupidity, which
is what Mad Scientist actually suffers from.