![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi -- I'm willing to ask politly for a few more details. My
understanding is that the time delay comes from the continued absorption and readmission of photons (in greater and greater numbers at lower and lower energies) as they work their way up through the radiation zone. So a simple-minded guess at the lowered estimates for travel time would be that the calculated opacity of the solar interior has been revised downward. Is that what's happened? If so, what developments led to this revision? If not, what specific changes to the solar model led to the greatly reduced estimate of the time delay? Thanks, Stephen Chris L Peterson wrote in message . .. On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:38:18 GMT, "Mick" wrote: Well, I hope you feel smart knowing this, but your question still hasn't been answered. Of course it has. The reason (which Sam stated) is that the solar model has changed. He also provided some nice links summarizing the current model. Do your own homework if you want to find pictures of the older model (Martin has a reference in his original question). Sam didn't write a treatise on what has changed, but he succinctly explained the reason for the difference in values over 20 years. If you want more detail, and are willing to ask in a polite way, I'm sure Sam would be happy to oblige. Of what value is your empty criticism to anyone, however? _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Couldn't you wait 'till next month to ask the question? I've been
reading everything I can get my hands on and the last book is on the Solar science and I just finished half the book. The last chapter was on the neutrino and how they are created and changed and how they were counted all the way up to 1995. Given another month and I'd have finished the book and could be updated with this thread. Slow down guys and let me catch up :-( -- Michael A. Barlow "Martin Frey" wrote in message ... 1982, Robert Noyes, The Sun Our Star, says: The energy released in (the core) as a gamma ray ... is destined to spend the next 10 million years struggling to the surface. BUT 2002, Freedman and Kauffmann, Universe, says: As a result, it takes approximately 170,000 years for energy created at the sun's centre to travel 696,000 km to the solar surface and finally escape as sunlight. Any thoughts on why this number has changed so radically in 20 years? (Or if either or neither is right?) -- Martin Frey http://www.hadastro.org.uk N 51 02 E 0 47 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 29th 04 01:49 AM |
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities | * | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:29 PM |
disaster warning | Anonymous | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 23rd 04 09:31 PM |
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 20th 03 04:59 PM |