![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Paul" wrote in message ws.com...
Hi Pieter, Good to hear from you! Hope all is well. Yeah, I'm very fine, thanks! I'll try Cartes du Ciel as everyone says, thanks for the quick help!!! Pieter |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The downside is that nobody is going to put in a great effort to create new
software when the competition is free. Look how development has slowed down on TheSky. I would rather pay and get a great product. Del Johnson "Jax" wrote in message ... excellent product! the best money you won't spend g peace, jon |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The downside is that nobody is going to put in a great effort to create new
software when the competition is free. Look how development has slowed down on TheSky. I would rather pay and get a great product. Del Johnson "Jax" wrote in message ... excellent product! the best money you won't spend g peace, jon |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Johnson wrote:
The downside is that nobody is going to put in a great effort to create new software when the competition is free. Look how development has slowed down on TheSky. I would rather pay and get a great product. Are you sure the development has slowed down for that reason, and not something else--such as that TheSky has matured sufficiently? TheSky (Level IV, or whatever the highest level is) is sufficiently expensive that I doubt that Cartes du Ciel is much competition. If you are the sort that waited this long, and is only now downloading CdC, I don't think you'd have bought TheSky, anyway. (Obviously, I don't mean you personally, Del!) I originally set up my $10 registration for PleiadAtlas for precisely this reason--because I did not want to undercut other astronomy software writers for the Palm. I never did it for the money; if I had, I'd be sorely disappointed. If I had it all to do over again, I probably would just make it freeware. I don't think that doing so would affect Planetarium or 2Sky very much at all. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Johnson wrote:
The downside is that nobody is going to put in a great effort to create new software when the competition is free. Look how development has slowed down on TheSky. I would rather pay and get a great product. Are you sure the development has slowed down for that reason, and not something else--such as that TheSky has matured sufficiently? TheSky (Level IV, or whatever the highest level is) is sufficiently expensive that I doubt that Cartes du Ciel is much competition. If you are the sort that waited this long, and is only now downloading CdC, I don't think you'd have bought TheSky, anyway. (Obviously, I don't mean you personally, Del!) I originally set up my $10 registration for PleiadAtlas for precisely this reason--because I did not want to undercut other astronomy software writers for the Palm. I never did it for the money; if I had, I'd be sorely disappointed. If I had it all to do over again, I probably would just make it freeware. I don't think that doing so would affect Planetarium or 2Sky very much at all. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I am sure. Software Bisque hasn't released a major upgrade to TheSky
in years and the previous (very) minor upgrade was last August. The pocket PC edition has been at version 1.10 for about a year. TheSky could be 10 times what it is now if the Bisque brothers earned a decent return for their efforts. Everybody wants their software for free but at the same time expect to paid when they go to work. The fact that freeware has caught up to TheSky is more a shame than a reason to celebrate. Del Johnson "Brian Tung" wrote in message ... Del Johnson wrote: The downside is that nobody is going to put in a great effort to create new software when the competition is free. Look how development has slowed down on TheSky. I would rather pay and get a great product. Are you sure the development has slowed down for that reason, and not something else--such as that TheSky has matured sufficiently? TheSky (Level IV, or whatever the highest level is) is sufficiently expensive that I doubt that Cartes du Ciel is much competition. If you are the sort that waited this long, and is only now downloading CdC, I don't think you'd have bought TheSky, anyway. (Obviously, I don't mean you personally, Del!) Brian Tung |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I am sure. Software Bisque hasn't released a major upgrade to TheSky
in years and the previous (very) minor upgrade was last August. The pocket PC edition has been at version 1.10 for about a year. TheSky could be 10 times what it is now if the Bisque brothers earned a decent return for their efforts. Everybody wants their software for free but at the same time expect to paid when they go to work. The fact that freeware has caught up to TheSky is more a shame than a reason to celebrate. Del Johnson "Brian Tung" wrote in message ... Del Johnson wrote: The downside is that nobody is going to put in a great effort to create new software when the competition is free. Look how development has slowed down on TheSky. I would rather pay and get a great product. Are you sure the development has slowed down for that reason, and not something else--such as that TheSky has matured sufficiently? TheSky (Level IV, or whatever the highest level is) is sufficiently expensive that I doubt that Cartes du Ciel is much competition. If you are the sort that waited this long, and is only now downloading CdC, I don't think you'd have bought TheSky, anyway. (Obviously, I don't mean you personally, Del!) Brian Tung |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Johnson wrote:
Yes, I am sure. Unless they've told you this is the reason you are just speculating and calling it fact... No matter how "sure" you are. -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Johnson wrote:
Yes, I am sure. Unless they've told you this is the reason you are just speculating and calling it fact... No matter how "sure" you are. -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html To reply remove spleen |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Johnson wrote:
Yes, I am sure. Software Bisque hasn't released a major upgrade to TheSky in years and the previous (very) minor upgrade was last August. The pocket PC edition has been at version 1.10 for about a year. Your contention is that V6 is a very minor upgrade? I wasn't aware of that. Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ANN: Deepsky Astronomy Software (DAS) World Promotion Extensoin | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 24th 04 02:11 AM |
ANN: Astronomy Software | DEEPSKY 2003 | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 19th 04 05:11 AM |
Astronomy Software for yo | JOHN PAZMINO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 22nd 03 02:35 AM |
Free Astronomy Log Software | David Green | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | August 6th 03 02:11 AM |