![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 2:24:03 PM UTC-7, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
In article On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 22:33:57 -0700 (PDT), wrote: The original "Total Recall" the remake was s---. But the idea of forming a new atmosphere on Mars is lunacy. https://phys.org/news/2018-07-mars-t...echnology.html Read Robinson's Mars Trilogy for a good treatment of what is scientifically possible, even reasonable, for terraforming Mars. It isn't fantasy, and it isn't beyond our scientific or technical means. That doesn't mean doing it anytime in the near future makes much sense. But that's a matter of social policy, not scientific ability. The oxygen leaked off the planet what, a billion years ago? How will they keep it there now? It needs to be constantly replaced. But the leak rate is low- how long do we need to keep it there? It's not like there are going to be any humans in millions of years, and it takes hundreds of millions of years to lose significant amounts of oxygen. Mars has no magnetic field and relatively weak gravity. Could you even add oxygen as fast as it would be lost? And once you got enough oxygen there the atmosphere would still be too thin for a human to breathe. "Terraforming" on a planet like Mars is going to have to mean just digging out underground warrens and pressurizing them with beathable air. Sending humans to Mars is like , adding dinosaur to todays earth echo system! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 23:24:01 +0200 (CEST), "Anonymous Remailer
(austria)" wrote: Mars has no magnetic field and relatively weak gravity. Could you even add oxygen as fast as it would be lost? And once you got enough oxygen there the atmosphere would still be too thin for a human to breathe. The numbers I've seen suggest that it's feasible to create an oxygen atmosphere of reasonable pressure in about a thousand years just scaling existing technology, and that such an atmosphere probably has a life of around 100 million years. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, August 11, 2018 at 1:44:43 AM UTC+1, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 23:24:01 +0200 (CEST), "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" wrote: Mars has no magnetic field and relatively weak gravity. Could you even add oxygen as fast as it would be lost? And once you got enough oxygen there the atmosphere would still be too thin for a human to breathe. The numbers I've seen suggest that it's feasible to create an oxygen atmosphere of reasonable pressure in about a thousand years just scaling existing technology, and that such an atmosphere probably has a life of around 100 million years. The slogan 'run the numbers' has always brought a smile as running numbers was originally a product of the 1920's - https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...ning%20numbers Of course the engineers mean it in a different sense but this simulation business on a planetary scale is for those who have no feel for planetary sciences and are just letting their imagination run wild. It is time for engineers to run the numbers on timekeeping and come to an understanding about the limitations of modeling motions using a system which is founded on astronomical cycles. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |
Total Eclipse in the Orbit of "Hinode" (Solar-B) (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | April 26th 07 11:51 PM |
"Black Hole" on the SciFi Channel | Double-A | Misc | 89 | June 13th 06 06:11 PM |