Tonight is the big DEBATE..

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:02:02 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

I'm sure that you're a Hillary, "She hasn't been criminally charged,
yet," Clintoon fan.

Right now, my vote is for Bernie Sanders. After him, Martin O'Malley.
But obviously, I'd vote for Hillary over any of the clowns in the
Republican bus. I don't have any real problem with her, I'd just
rather see a fresher face in the White House.

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 15:50:15 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote this crap:

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:02:02 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

I'm sure that you're a Hillary, "She hasn't been criminally charged,
yet," Clintoon fan.

Right now, my vote is for Bernie Sanders. After him, Martin O'Malley.
But obviously, I'd vote for Hillary over any of the clowns in the
Republican bus. I don't have any real problem with her, I'd just
rather see a fresher face in the White House.

Hillary hates the military. She and her husband are also criminals.
Her husband was impeached and disbarred. She has also lost her law
license. She belongs in an orange pantsuit.


This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 5:12:56 PM UTC-5, Lord Vath wrote:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 15:50:15 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote this crap:

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:02:02 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

I'm sure that you're a Hillary, "She hasn't been criminally charged,
yet," Clintoon fan.

Right now, my vote is for Bernie Sanders. After him, Martin O'Malley.
But obviously, I'd vote for Hillary over any of the clowns in the
Republican bus. I don't have any real problem with her, I'd just
rather see a fresher face in the White House.

Hillary hates the military. She and her husband are also criminals.
Her husband was impeached and disbarred. She has also lost her law
license. She belongs in an orange pantsuit.

Hillary hates the military?? I think more accurately you hate yourself. I see it in every post of yours. Pathetic.

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:12:50 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote:

Hillary hates the military.

You mean she's not pro-military? Good, neither am I.

She and her husband are also criminals.

I see no evidence that Hillary is a criminal, not that her husband
was, except in the most trivial sense of the word.

Her husband was impeached and disbarred.

For something I don't consider a moral failure. But in any case, her
husband's legal issues are not hers.

She has also lost her law license.

It has neither been revoked nor suspended in any jurisdiction. It may
be inactive- that is common when lawyers stop practicing.

On Thursday, 6 August 2015 13:23:08 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:05:18 -0700 (PDT), Uncarollo2
wrote:

.. with my favorite candidate

exclusively on FOX! it's a date.

It's like Saturday Night Live. Not worth watching, because you can get
the 5 minutes of humor the next day in YouTube clips. This will be the
same.

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

On Thursday, 6 August 2015 13:23:08 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:05:18 -0700 (PDT), Uncarollo2
wrote:

.. with my favorite candidate

exclusively on FOX! it's a date.

It's like Saturday Night Live. Not worth watching, because you can get
the 5 minutes of humor the next day in YouTube clips. This will be the
same.

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics. Turnout is
quite good among those with college degrees.

I do take an interest. I've never missed voting in any election. But I
don't need a "debate" to know that every single declared Republican
candidate would be very bad for the country, leaving it much worse off
than when they started (like the last Republican president). There are
no viable candidates in the Republican fold. They've already presented
their positions.

I don't vote on party lines. I'm a Republican who has voted for
Democrats, Greens, Independents, and Republicans (although none of the
latter in the last couple decades, except for a few county officials).

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:45:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:44:14 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 9:45:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, the undereducated do seriously skew the statistics.

And they are Democrats.

Mostly, they are southern Republicans.

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 7:35:47 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
On Thursday, 6 August 2015 13:23:08 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:05:18 -0700 (PDT), Uncarollo2
wrote:

.. with my favorite candidate

exclusively on FOX! it's a date.

It's like Saturday Night Live. Not worth watching, because you can get
the 5 minutes of humor the next day in YouTube clips. This will be the
same.

When it comes to elections, Americans are the most apathetic voters, turn-outs are poor. You should take more interest, unless like so many androids, you simply always vote along party lines?

Yes, you are correct. Voters are apathetic, but I think it's by design. Incumbents want it that way. Why do you think they get re-elected 90% of the time?

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 10:38:30 PM UTC-6, Uncarollo2 wrote:

Yes, you are correct. Voters are apathetic, but I think it's by design.
Incumbents want it that way. Why do you think they get re-elected 90% of the
time?

In Congress, committee positions are awarded by seniority; thus, districts and
states re-elect incumbent Representatives and Senators in order that Federal
projects located in their districts will not be relocated by their replacements
from elsewhere on important committees.

That is why.

John Savard