Physicists prove the universe doesn't exist!!!

On Friday, July 4, 2014 11:22:00 PM UTC+12, Brad Guth wrote:
On Thursday, July 3, 2014 11:16:51 PM UTC-7, wrote:

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:12:53 PM UTC+12, Double-A wrote:



http://news.yahoo.com/universe-shoul...220219618.html















Amazing!















Double-A











The cosmos obviously exists. However, space and time as we conceive of it, cannot exist.







How can this be?







Well, the world is very likely to be two dimensional with two extra dimensions (space and time as we know it) arising out of the two dimensional structure.







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIl3Hfh9tY







http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...lly-is-a-holo/







http://www.pma.caltech.edu/~physlab/...can1105-56.pdf



Indeed, space and time making up our perceived 3rd dimension within our otherwise 2D existence.



There's certainly more than sufficient volumetric mass if our universe is only 94 GY diameter, and when it started out as something very small (say less than a couple light years diameter) its concentrated mass of perhaps 5e56 kg (initial m3 of Plank density of supposedly 5e96 kg) as expanding its physical radius at 'c' should have been impossible unless there was an ongoing aether/dark-matter flow inflating our universe (exactly as contributor mpc755 suggested).



I keep having to revise my estimate of the universe mass because, modern physics and science keeps discovering more itsy-bitsy items of mass. Even quantum entangled photons seem capable of representing mass of at least one electron, and as far as anyone knows there's no shortage of photons.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-source-1.html

This is consistent with Susskind's ideas that we exist in a holographic universe projected into the interior of a rather large black hole.

Black hole complementarity is a conjectured solution to the black hole information paradox, proposed by Leonard Susskind.

Hawking thinks information is lost in an evaporating black hole once it passes through the event horizon. This turns pure quantum states into mixed states. Susskind wondered if a complete theory of quantum gravity might be able to conserve information.

How is this possible if information can't escape the event horizon? Hawking radiation is ruled out as a carrier of the missing information. Information can't be "reflected" from the horizon according to Hawkins since there is nothing special about it.

Susskind proved that information is both reflected at the event horizon and passes through the event horizon and can't escape. No one can see both. Everything happens in a membrane hovering about a Planck length outside the event horizon.

Complementarity occurs in quantum mechanics of noncommuting observables, and Susskind showed that both observers are complementary in the quantum sense operating on the black hole membrane.

Observers stuck in the membrane see a holographic universe. New material dropping in increases the size of the universe, and gives rise to photons and particles appearing within that projected hologram - just like the observations we see.

Observers inside will see the point of entry of the information from the horizon. Observers outside the black hole will see the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated.

Baryon number is violated for the internal observer. But only at very small scales compared to the life of the particle involved. Since the proton has a very long lifetime the scale for matter we see can extend to trillions of years. Beyond that, time breaks down as particles spontaneously disappear when they are re-radiated by the black hole surface.

On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 9:28:48 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Friday, July 4, 2014 11:22:00 PM UTC+12, Brad Guth wrote:

On Thursday, July 3, 2014 11:16:51 PM UTC-7, wrote:



On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:12:53 PM UTC+12, Double-A wrote:







http://news.yahoo.com/universe-shoul...220219618.html































Amazing!































Double-A























The cosmos obviously exists. However, space and time as we conceive of it, cannot exist.















How can this be?















Well, the world is very likely to be two dimensional with two extra dimensions (space and time as we know it) arising out of the two dimensional structure.















https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIl3Hfh9tY















http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...lly-is-a-holo/















http://www.pma.caltech.edu/~physlab/...can1105-56.pdf







Indeed, space and time making up our perceived 3rd dimension within our otherwise 2D existence.







There's certainly more than sufficient volumetric mass if our universe is only 94 GY diameter, and when it started out as something very small (say less than a couple light years diameter) its concentrated mass of perhaps 5e56 kg (initial m3 of Plank density of supposedly 5e96 kg) as expanding its physical radius at 'c' should have been impossible unless there was an ongoing aether/dark-matter flow inflating our universe (exactly as contributor mpc755 suggested).







I keep having to revise my estimate of the universe mass because, modern physics and science keeps discovering more itsy-bitsy items of mass. Even quantum entangled photons seem capable of representing mass of at least one electron, and as far as anyone knows there's no shortage of photons.



http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-source-1.html



This is consistent with Susskind's ideas that we exist in a holographic universe projected into the interior of a rather large black hole.



Black hole complementarity is a conjectured solution to the black hole information paradox, proposed by Leonard Susskind.



Hawking thinks information is lost in an evaporating black hole once it passes through the event horizon. This turns pure quantum states into mixed states. Susskind wondered if a complete theory of quantum gravity might be able to conserve information.



How is this possible if information can't escape the event horizon? Hawking radiation is ruled out as a carrier of the missing information. Information can't be "reflected" from the horizon according to Hawkins since there is nothing special about it.



Susskind proved that information is both reflected at the event horizon and passes through the event horizon and can't escape. No one can see both. Everything happens in a membrane hovering about a Planck length outside the event horizon.



Complementarity occurs in quantum mechanics of noncommuting observables, and Susskind showed that both observers are complementary in the quantum sense operating on the black hole membrane.



Observers stuck in the membrane see a holographic universe. New material dropping in increases the size of the universe, and gives rise to photons and particles appearing within that projected hologram - just like the observations we see.



Observers inside will see the point of entry of the information from the horizon. Observers outside the black hole will see the information being spread out uniformly over the entire stretched horizon before being re-radiated.



Baryon number is violated for the internal observer. But only at very small scales compared to the life of the particle involved. Since the proton has a very long lifetime the scale for matter we see can extend to trillions of years. Beyond that, time breaks down as particles spontaneously disappear when they are re-radiated by the black hole surface.

The notion of BH wormholes of a cosmic computer, being where infinite data gets stored and transferred on demand, at least would make their existence extremely functional for accommodating our multi-trillion year old protons (essentially immortal matter) and for storing the vast amount of cosmic intelligence.


If each lifeform within this universe created a terabyte of data per hour, we'd run ourselves out of atoms for storing that much data.