Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus)

Andromeda could turn out as being near half again as massive as our
galaxy, and with its 300+ km/sec arrival and dominate mass should make
for roughly another 2.5 billion years worth of relative safety.
However, once our galaxies start mixing it up, and some of the
interacting proper motions reaching 1000 km/sec, it’s going to be
another 250 million years worth of serious touch and go, with perhaps
250 billion stars being directly interfered with and at least 2.5
billion stars getting obliterated, and perhaps equally billions of
others created before the “all clear” message goes out.

In other words, our odds of escaping this cosmic gauntlet unscratched
are not very good, although a thousand to one odds against our solar
system getting obliterated beyond the point of no return would to most
of us seem nearly invincible. However, by then our sun isn’t going to
be all that terrific for us anyway, and that’s only if nothing from
the Sirius Oort cloud or via any other wandering nomads of planets,
planetoids or substantial asteroids haven’t nailed us.

The good news is that a great many other solar systems should pass
within a light year, and thereby making contact with other
civilizations a whole lot better for SETI. By then we should be
recovering from WWX, and our NOW managing our planet as hosting only
500 million humans will likely be capable of interstellar treks that
offer less than a few light years distance if at least 10% ‘c’ (30,000
km/sec) velocity of human space travel can be achieved.

In the meantime, we have plenty of nearby opportunities to exploit and
even fight over, such as our moon and the extremely nearby planet
Venus, whereas each of those should have been sought after as of
decades ago, instead of mutually perpetrating cold-wars, creating and
sustaining proxy wars, and the systematic exploitations of various
civilizations here on Earth.


On Apr 12, 11:00*am, Brad Guth wrote:
If we can systematically manage to exploit our planet to the very
brink of failing its 7+ billion human population, plus having
devastated the global biodiversity due to our industrialized methods
of polluting, mass consumptions and the growing lack of natural
resources that’s forcing global inflation in addition to the unpoliced
insider trading plus feeding our military industrial complex and
numerous Ponzi scams that oligarchs don’t seem to mind nor find
anything wrong with, and our having accomplished this task of global
exploitation extensively within the last thousand years, just imagine
how fast we should be able to exploit our moon and the extremely
nearby planet Venus.

If we can otherwise manage to survive for days on end while on the
100% radiated and naked surface of our physically dark and
paramagnetic moon without so much as a scratch or even one X-ray or
gamma photon finding so much as even one photographic grain of their
Kodak film that somehow offered superior dynamic range to the best or
even better than any CCD imaging, and otherwise for humans surviving
onboard ISS while drifting in the hard vacuum of space for months on
end (not to mention other mainstream arguments of going to/from Mars
being represented as no big insurmountable deal, and otherwise as for
cruising *6+ months while remaining deep underwater, as well surviving
terrestrial surface environments of always subfreezing conditions or
of those badly flooded to scorching hot and dry land being perfectly
doable, then perhaps using a composite rigid airship for accomplishing
Venus or especially the use of TBMs for digging deep into our moon,
simply can't be all that insurmountable.

On Mar 26, 11:12*am, Brad Guth wrote: What isn’t well understood about Venus is perhaps more interesting
than what little we do know, even if GuthVenus is every bit as
unnatural as it seems. *It’s a case of using our deductive
subjectivity as for filling in the blanks and connecting the dots with
the best available science. *Of course the mainstream of status-quo of
naysayers will gladly obfuscate their butts off before allowing an
outsider to get an inch or gram of credit for anything, because that’s
their job.

*“Ever-Changing Venus Superstorm Sparks Interest”
*http://news.yahoo.com/ever-changing-...arks-interest-...

*“Venus And Her Layers Of Carbon Dioxide”
*http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/04/0...ers-of-carbon-...

*“The takeaway on all of this….. models and the theories behind them
are very useful when postulating new thoughts. *But, only if they
include the realities science has already given us. *And lastly, in
all science, regardless of the school of thought, observation is
king. *It always has been, it always will be. *You can model, theorize
and postulate until the cows come home but none of that matters when
observation tells you otherwise.”

There’s actually quite a bit of *old but perfectly reliable science
interpretation within that blog of “Suyts Space”, and you certainly do
not have to agree with all of it.

My ongoing observationology as to Venus (aka GuthVenus) is what bugs
the hell out of others, because they can’t stand whenever an outsider
has anything of value to offer and share, and besides it’s always
their redneck and FUD-master job to topic/author stalk and trash us
outsiders at every opportunity. *Proof is, in the 12+ years that I’ve
been around, it seems they can’t point to one individual they’ve ever
helped to disclose or promote anything, although having no problems
whatsoever with easily pointing out the 100% of outsiders as having
been topic/author stalked and summarily trashed at each and every
opportunity, especially on social/political issues these insiders as
FUD-masters do not want to allow any free speech benefits to go
unmoderated.

Why is the extremely nearby(100 LD) planet Venus always such a
mainstream taboo/nondisclosure issue?

Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software,
as to viewing this one small but rather interesting mountainous area
of Venus, using your independent deductive expertise as to enlarge or
magnify this extensively mountainous terrain of Venus that I’ve
focused upon, really shouldn’t be asking too much. *Most of modern
PhotoZoom and numerous other photographic software variations tend to
accomplish this enlargement process automatically (including iPhone
and Safari), although some extra applied filtering and thereby image
enhancing for dynamic range compensations can further improve upon the
end result (no direct pixel modifications should ever be necessary,
because it’s all a derivative from the original Magellan radar
imaging).

“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow...

*http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth#
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth
Venus”, GuthVenus

On Feb 26, 5:32*am, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 2, 7:45*am, Brad Guth wrote:

Is Venus as truly insurmountable as we’ve been taught to believe?

It’s not exactly a Goldilocks kind of place, because it’s certainly
hot and seriously pressurized.

Those perfectly natural looking mountains, canyons and the associated
rock seem about right.

The atmosphere is mostly toxic to us, but well above them thick acidic
clouds it gets way colder than anywhere here or above Earth, and so
what gives with that?

As to its surface, is there anything that’s otherwise out of place or
irregular upon its hot crust and of the mountainous geology of its
roasted to death terrain and subsequent erosion that’s perhaps even a
wee bit unnatural or unexpected?

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth
Venus”,GuthVenus

“GuthVenus” at 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow...

It’s always amazing how topics associated with the investigative
exploitation of our moon, Venus or even that of utilizing their L1 or
L2, has been so systematically policy taboo/nondisclosure controlled
by those of our mainstream status-quo facade of *authority, in that
any honest attempt of a given topic to expose is automatically
forbidden (other than being topic/author stalked and trashed for all
those at risk of façade exposure can muster).

As soon as any topic or its author is the least bit suggestive that
our government is capable of not having told us the whole truth about
anything, a gauntlet of all sorts of topic/author stalking hell breaks
loose on behalf of mainstream damage-control.

Of course we also do not see any K-12s anywhere within public Usenet/
newsgroups for a darn good reason, because freedom of speech is
actually managed as something entirely conditional as to the audience
at hand. *This is also why most institutionalized prisoners are never
given internet access as to any public forums or mainstream media that
might offer an audience that isn’t being controlled or manipulated,
and most Americans as well as other Nations of oligarch controlled
intellect seem to like it that way.

Social media forums like Facebook, Twitter *and even Google+ are
equally managed on a client by client basis, of receiving context as
well as for transmitting information to any other given client or
group/circle of friends, making it really quite downright handy for
our NSA/CIA and you name it agency or special-interest group of
pretentious or self-righteous authority to monitor as well as to step
right in and covertly control opr dominate any given situation,
because public publishing of too much truth isn’t actually tolerated.
Nowadays, mainstream internet and especially intranet servers are
capable of managing each individual client, as to whatever they get to
see, because most Americans are simply not smart enough to get past
the mainstream façade.

“Façade is an artificial intelligence-based art/research experiment in
electronic narrative – an attempt to move beyond traditional branching
or hyper-linked ...”

Façade/facade: “An artificial or deceptive front: ideological slogans
that were a façade for geopolitical power struggles.”

Most proxy wars are essentially façades for reasons that the general
public isn’t allowed to discover, and the ongoing ruse and usually FUD
involved within our mainstream façade, is quite real, as is the faith-
based façade that’s continually indoctrinated into us from birth to
grave.

On the other positive/constructive hand; *where’s the down side to off-
world exploitations?

Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software,
as to viewing this one small but rather interesting area of Venus,
using your independent deductive expertise as to enlarge or magnify
this mountainous area of Venus that I’ve focused upon, shouldn’t be
asking too much. *Most of modern PhotoZoom and other photographic
software variations tend to accomplish this enlargement process
automatically (including iPhone and Safari), although some extra
filtering and dynamic range compensations can further improve on the
end result (no direct pixel modifications are ever necessary).

“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow...

*http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth#
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth
Venus”, GuthVenus