![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There will be people unmoved by the time lapse footage which
contemporary images introduces into astronomy as they rely on focusing on graphs,models and what have you but for those who can raise their perceptions to looking into the celestial arena from a moving Earth,the interplay can be as beautiful as the complexity of the human body or the vast diversity of life on this planet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwwioJhQzeg What makes the issue so painful is that we can look back on our planet and immerse ourselves in the cyclical stream of its motions for just long enough to make our own existence relevant and the continuing history of humanity.You cannot see the sullen ideologies of people in the time lapse video nor imagine that humans can control temperatures on this magnificent planet,perhaps pollution and resources we can control,but life goes on here as nowhere else and rather than this desperate search for life elsewhere,astronomers must return a sense of vibrancy to a discipline that is run ragged with novelties and meaningless junk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 4, 1:24*pm, o'kelleher wrote:
meaningless junk. Arrogance + Colossal = Fool. You do the maths, windbag. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is approaching orbital midnight at the North polar latitude and
along a line that circles the globe where correspondingly there is orbital noon at the South polar coordinate,it conveys the information that like the daily cycle,somewhere it is always noon and somewhere else it is midnight with the added orbital daylight/darkness cycle taking a year to complete.I would like to think that readers are familiar enough with the separate orbital daylight/darkness cycle to do a better job of explaining it in 2012 as it is a genuine insight.There is no time lapse footage as yet of this planetary orbital trait yet there is footage of the amazing spectacle that occurs near the poles - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYLd...eature=related There may be better times ahead when men choose to return to the geometric language of astronomy and ease understanding for those who are lost to right ascension reasoning and the tragic belief in the imbalance between days and rotations within the confines of 4 years/4 orbital circuits. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oriel36 wrote:
It is approaching orbital midnight at the North polar latitude and along a line that circles the globe where correspondingly there is orbital noon at the South polar coordinate,it conveys the information that like the daily cycle,somewhere it is always noon and somewhere else it is midnight with the added orbital daylight/darkness cycle taking a year to complete. Nonsense words which have no meaning. Orbital midnight indeed! A phrase you made up to make it sound to the ignorant that you have something real to say. I would like to think that readers are familiar enough with the separate orbital daylight/darkness cycle to do a better job of explaining it in 2012 as it is a genuine insight. No it's a delusion. There is no time lapse footage as yet of this planetary orbital trait And there will never be any because it doesn't exist. yet there is footage of the amazing spectacle that occurs near the poles - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYLd...eature=related Which has nothing to do with your point. There may be better times ahead when men choose to return to the geometric language of astronomy and ease understanding for those who are lost to right ascension reasoning and the tragic belief in the imbalance between days and rotations within the confines of 4 years/4 orbital circuits. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 4, 9:17*pm, Mike Collins wrote:
oriel36 wrote: It is approaching orbital midnight at the North polar latitude and along a line that circles the globe where correspondingly there is orbital noon at the South polar coordinate,it conveys the information that like the daily cycle,somewhere it is always noon and somewhere else it is midnight with the added orbital daylight/darkness cycle taking a year to complete. Nonsense words which have no meaning. Orbital midnight indeed! A phrase you made up to make it sound to the ignorant that you have something real to say. All locations on the planet experience a single daylight/darkness cycle due to the orbital motion of the Earth with the polar coordinates a clear window into that great cycle where the polar coordinate turn in a circle/cycle to the central Sun. The East to West orbital component of Uranus is set off against the South to North daily rotation so,drawing on direct observations and applying them locally, it is a certainty that relative to the central Sun,somewhere on Earth it is orbital noon and somewhere else orbital midnight http://www.newscientist.com/data/ima...2529-1_800.jpg That is why it is a different type of astronomy,contemporary imaging and time lapse footage makes it so easy to transfer to the Earth's characteristics so if you cannot appreciate what is in front of you then I am sorry but there is room for people who simply can see the orbital cycle and handle it in terms of global climate and variations in natural noon when applied to daily rotation. I would like to think that readers are familiar enough with the separate orbital daylight/darkness cycle to do a better job of explaining it in 2012 as it is a genuine insight. No it's a delusion. There is always the experimental analogy which allows a person to use a broom to substitute for daily rotation and orientation and walking/ orbiting a central object to imitate the orbital behavior of the Earth and that the polar coordinates do turn in a circle.If the smallest effort was given towards putting the analogy in context there would be no rubbish about human control over global temperatures. There is no time lapse footage as yet of this planetary orbital trait And there will never be any because it doesn't exist. Well,there already is for Uranus so affirmation is beyond doubt - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ yet there is footage of the amazing spectacle that occurs near the poles - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYLd...eature=related Which has nothing to do with your point. Do not be so dull,the chances are that electormagnetic properties due to the uneven rotational gradient between equator and poles light up when bombarded with incoming radiation from the Sun but this is just another topic to consider among many but won't be done y people who insist on an even rotational gradient to stellar circumpolar motion. There may be better times ahead when men choose to return to the geometric language of astronomy and ease understanding for those who are lost to right ascension reasoning and the tragic belief in the imbalance between days and rotations within the confines of 4 years/4 orbital circuits. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 5, 7:43*am, oriel36 wrote:
On Dec 4, 9:17*pm, Mike Collins wrote: oriel36 wrote: It is approaching orbital midnight at the North polar latitude and along a line that circles the globe where correspondingly there is orbital noon at the South polar coordinate,it conveys the information that like the daily cycle,somewhere it is always noon and somewhere else it is midnight with the added orbital daylight/darkness cycle taking a year to complete. Nonsense words which have no meaning. Orbital midnight indeed! A phrase you made up to make it sound to the ignorant that you have something real to say. All locations on the planet experience a single daylight/darkness cycle due to the orbital motion of the Earth with the polar coordinates a clear window into that great cycle where the polar coordinate turn in a circle/cycle to the central Sun. The East to West orbital component of Uranus is set off against the South to North daily rotation so,drawing on direct observations and applying them locally, it is a certainty that relative to the central Sun,somewhere on Earth it is orbital noon and somewhere else orbital midnight http://www.newscientist.com/data/ima...2529-1_800.jpg That is why it is a different type of astronomy,contemporary imaging and time lapse footage makes it so easy to transfer to the Earth's characteristics so if you cannot appreciate what is in front of you then I am sorry *but there is room for people who simply can see the orbital cycle and handle it in terms of global climate and variations in natural noon when applied to daily rotation. I would like to think that readers are familiar enough with the separate orbital daylight/darkness cycle to do a better job of explaining it in 2012 as it is a genuine insight. No it's a delusion. There is always the experimental analogy which allows a person to use a broom to substitute for daily rotation and orientation *and walking/ orbiting a central object to imitate the orbital behavior of the Earth and that the polar coordinates do turn in a circle.If the smallest effort was given towards putting the analogy in context there would be no rubbish about human control over global temperatures. There is no time lapse footage as yet of this planetary orbital trait And there will never be any because it doesn't exist. Well,there already is for Uranus so affirmation is beyond doubt - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ yet there is footage of the amazing spectacle that occurs near the poles - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYLd...eature=related Which has nothing to do with your point. Do not be so dull,the chances are that electormagnetic properties due to the uneven rotational gradient between equator and poles light up when bombarded with incoming radiation from the Sun but this is just another topic to consider among many but won't be done y people who insist on an even rotational gradient to stellar circumpolar motion. There may be better times ahead when men choose to return to the geometric language of astronomy and ease understanding for those who are lost to right ascension reasoning and the tragic belief in the imbalance between days and rotations within the confines of 4 years/4 orbital circuits. http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/ 2009/11/11/129024282237738265.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 5, 7:43*am, oriel36 wrote:
On Dec 4, 9:17*pm, Mike Collins wrote: oriel36 wrote: It is approaching orbital midnight at the North polar latitude and along a line that circles the globe where correspondingly there is orbital noon at the South polar coordinate,it conveys the information that like the daily cycle,somewhere it is always noon and somewhere else it is midnight with the added orbital daylight/darkness cycle taking a year to complete. Nonsense words which have no meaning. Orbital midnight indeed! A phrase you made up to make it sound to the ignorant that you have something real to say. All locations on the planet experience a single daylight/darkness cycle due to the orbital motion of the Earth with the polar coordinates a clear window into that great cycle where the polar coordinate turn in a circle/cycle to the central Sun. The East to West orbital component of Uranus is set off against the South to North daily rotation so,drawing on direct observations and applying them locally, it is a certainty that relative to the central Sun,somewhere on Earth it is orbital noon and somewhere else orbital midnight http://www.newscientist.com/data/ima...2529-1_800.jpg That is why it is a different type of astronomy,contemporary imaging and time lapse footage makes it so easy to transfer to the Earth's characteristics so if you cannot appreciate what is in front of you then I am sorry *but there is room for people who simply can see the orbital cycle and handle it in terms of global climate and variations in natural noon when applied to daily rotation. I would like to think that readers are familiar enough with the separate orbital daylight/darkness cycle to do a better job of explaining it in 2012 as it is a genuine insight. No it's a delusion. There is always the experimental analogy which allows a person to use a broom to substitute for daily rotation and orientation *and walking/ orbiting a central object to imitate the orbital behavior of the Earth and that the polar coordinates do turn in a circle.If the smallest effort was given towards putting the analogy in context there would be no rubbish about human control over global temperatures. There is no time lapse footage as yet of this planetary orbital trait And there will never be any because it doesn't exist. Well,there already is for Uranus so affirmation is beyond doubt - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ yet there is footage of the amazing spectacle that occurs near the poles - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYLd...eature=related Which has nothing to do with your point. Do not be so dull,the chances are that electormagnetic properties due to the uneven rotational gradient between equator and poles light up when bombarded with incoming radiation from the Sun but this is just another topic to consider among many but won't be done y people who insist on an even rotational gradient to stellar circumpolar motion. There may be better times ahead when men choose to return to the geometric language of astronomy and ease understanding for those who are lost to right ascension reasoning and the tragic belief in the imbalance between days and rotations within the confines of 4 years/4 orbital circuits. http://tinyurl.com/6v2j8c2 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 4, 9:01*am, oriel36 wrote:
There may be better times ahead when men choose to return to the geometric language of astronomy and ease understanding for those who are lost to right ascension reasoning One cannot make understanding easier by substituting falsehood for truth. John Savard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Broadcasting the Third Kind | nightbat[_1_] | Misc | 0 | February 19th 08 06:28 PM |
How Kind is Humankind ?? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 3 | September 18th 06 10:04 PM |
My kind of guy | Mike Thomas | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 4th 04 03:37 AM |
What kind of eyepiece is this??? | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 18th 04 10:37 PM |
Geo Was Right! (Kind of) | John Beaderstadt | History | 17 | April 23rd 04 10:50 PM |