Inspiration and the love of creation

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:22:05 -0700 (PDT), Chris.B wrote:

Dare I point you at the disastrously shrinking, daily post count? I
merely borrowed our pet megalomaniac, Andrex'(s) usual posting style.
Perhaps we can blame him? If you think the common, or garden, "F
word" still has shock value then it was obviously wasted on our
resident 'effin' lunatic.

What is that? A red herring if ever I saw one! You posted that post
to "help" improve SAA? Gimme a break!

I would submit that Oriel's views are utterly HARMLESS to all but
himself. We cannot reason with him - too many people to count have
tried and failed. Mocking oriel -- is futile; and your "cure" is far
worse for SAA than any of oriels "appeals to authority", or his word
salad.

If you feel compelled to confront oriel, why not proceed as Sam, or
John, and (very few) others have done: answer him with objective, well
reasoned, and well stated information? Or if he's really bother you so
much, maybe you need to look at yourself to find out why you're using
him as an excuse to act like an idiot. "Protecting SAA" - that's red
herring!

--
Email address is a Spam trap.

On Oct 10, 8:55*pm, Bill wrote:
*"Protecting SAA" - that's red herring! * *

Give a man a fish...

On Oct 10, 8:55*pm, Bill wrote:

I would submit that Oriel's views are utterly HARMLESS to all but
himself. * We cannot reason with him - too many people to count have
tried and failed. *Mocking oriel -- is futile; and your "cure" is far
worse for SAA than any of oriels "appeals to authority", or his word
salad.


You poor people,the appeal is that there is no authority hence people
are going to have to work things out themselves.

The first thing to happen was the appearance of a rotational mechanism
for crustal evolution and motion,the slow acceptance that the
spherical deviation of the planet and the motion of the fractured
crust share a common rotating fluid mechanism common to all rotating
celestial objects with exposed viscous compositions - differential
rotation.

In June 2005 I watched the weak responses to the introduction of the
uneven rotational gradient causing the uneven spherical shape of the
planet -

http://www.natscience.com/Uwe/Forum....ical-mechanism

All that has happened since then are guys trying to retrace the path
to something I worked on and enjoyed working on many years ago in an
era when people were promoting harmless 'convection cells'.


If you feel compelled to confront oriel, why not proceed as Sam, or
John, and (very few) others have done: *answer him with objective, well
reasoned, and well stated information?

There is nothing harmless about people who truly believe there is an
imbalance between 1461 days and 1461 rotations as no pupil ever learns
how terrestrial effects they experience during the day and during the
year mesh with astronomical causes but your festering minds will fill
students full of junk that represent neither human achievements nor
much else.

You are finished as a cult,even if you console yourselves as you are
now doing there is nothing to stop many of the modifications I have
already introduced from appearing and despite appearances,the reaction
is more or less what is expected and accepted as with all major
modifications be they in such diverse areas from geological evolution
to a new explanation for the seasons,why natural noon cycles vary or
the differences between polar and daily twilight,something people can
use,experience and admire.

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:18:01 -0700 (PDT), Chris.B wrote:

On Oct 10, 8:55*pm, Bill wrote:
*"Protecting SAA" - that's red herring! * *

Give a man a fish...

He'd probably say that I was trying to steal his fish!
--
Email address is a Spam trap.

On 10 Okt., 22:20, Bill wrote:

He'd probably say that I was trying to steal his fish! * *

That I doubt.

What irritates me most about kelleher, and his ilk, is the tragic
waste of completely unearned, inherited talent. Talent which is denied
to the vast majority of human beings. Their intelligence is forced to
shine through a dense, nebular cloud of screaming (or raving) idiocy.
It is true that their talent is theirs to do with as they will. Just
as a millionaire can choose to light his Cuban cigars with large
denomination banknotes. (Should he so desire) It is the cripppling
lack of humility and magination, in both cases, which gets on my
nerves. I suppose one could also argue that every weapons research
scientist is an utter waste of grey matter. It just seems completely
illogical, to me at least, that intelligence and wisdom are so rarely
found in the same skull.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:16:24 -0700 (PDT), Chris.B wrote:

On 10 Okt., 22:20, Bill wrote:

He'd probably say that I was trying to steal his fish! * *

That I doubt.

What irritates me most about kelleher, and his ilk, is the tragic
waste of completely unearned, inherited talent. Talent which is denied
to the vast majority of human beings. Their intelligence is forced to
shine through a dense, nebular cloud of screaming (or raving) idiocy.
It is true that their talent is theirs to do with as they will. Just
as a millionaire can choose to light his Cuban cigars with large
denomination banknotes. (Should he so desire) It is the cripppling
lack of humility and magination, in both cases, which gets on my
nerves. I suppose one could also argue that every weapons research
scientist is an utter waste of grey matter. It just seems completely
illogical, to me at least, that intelligence and wisdom are so rarely
found in the same skull.

I'd offer to ship you a mirror, but you'd only point it at oriel.
Peace dude
--
Email address is a Spam trap.

On Oct 11, 6:06*pm, Bill wrote:

I'd offer to ship you a mirror, but you'd only point it at oriel.
Peace dude

Somehow, I doubt that oriel owns a reflection. Any relationship
between oriel and windows is strictly of the ventilated grill
variety. The only other thing they have in common is that neither
reaches the ground.

Peace, Man. Y'all have a nice day, dy'hear? :-)