Crackpot "Androcles" exposed

"SolomonW" wrote in message
...
| On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:46:12 +0100, Androcles wrote:
|
| and the incredibly
| stupid moron actually COPIES text from my page hoping for a brownie
| point.
|
| I tend to agree that people that copy text from your page are moron.

Oh good.
The text in question is on a photocopy of a page from "Nature"
magazine. Copying it when anyone can obtain the original or read
my page has to be the epitome of stupidity.

| Nothing will convince you that you are wrong.

Of course, because I am right.

| So why does he bother?

Because he's a stupid bigot and a complete imbecile that can't read
mathematics. There are lots of them about, they are as common as
pebbles on a beach. One needs to be really lucky to find a diamond
among them, someone that can actually divide instead of multiply,
but I keep looking.

On Sep 5, 8:54*am, "Androcles" .
2011 wrote:
"SolomonW" wrote in message

...
| On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:46:12 +0100, Androcles wrote:
|
| and the incredibly
| stupid moron actually COPIES text from my page hoping for a brownie
| point.
|
| I tend to agree that people that copy text from your page are moron.

Oh good.
The text in question is on a photocopy of a page from "Nature"
magazine. *Copying it when anyone can obtain the original or read
my page has to be the epitome of stupidity.

| Nothing will convince you that you are wrong.

Of course, because I am right.

| So why does he bother?

Because he's a stupid bigot and a complete imbecile that can't read
mathematics. There are lots of them about, they are as common as
pebbles on a beach. One needs to be really lucky to find a diamond
among them, someone that can actually divide instead of multiply,
but I keep looking.

Androcles makes the same mistake in his derivation of the "Einstein
expansion," replacing what he thinks is the erroneous "Lorentz
contraction" derivation of Einstein.

He just cannot understand hoe a "moving" frame of reference can be the
rest frame of a moving particle. No wonder he thinks that the
equations mean a "time contraction" to go with his "length expansion."

But all is consistent with his belief in a smallest real number
greater than zero and his belief that a particle on the rim of a wheel
rotaing at constant angular velovity is experiencing tangential
acceleration.

The fact that no one with any intelligence believes him is to him just
evidence of his own infinite intelligence and the infinite stupidity
of everyone else.

Read him for his entertainment value only.

Uncle Ben

"Uncle Ben" wrote in message
...
On Sep 5, 8:54 am, "Androcles" .
2011 wrote:
"SolomonW" wrote in message

...
| On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:46:12 +0100, Androcles wrote:
|
| and the incredibly
| stupid moron actually COPIES text from my page hoping for a brownie
| point.
|
| I tend to agree that people that copy text from your page are moron.

Oh good.
The text in question is on a photocopy of a page from "Nature"
magazine. Copying it when anyone can obtain the original or read
my page has to be the epitome of stupidity.

| Nothing will convince you that you are wrong.

Of course, because I am right.

| So why does he bother?

Because he's a stupid bigot and a complete imbecile that can't read
mathematics. There are lots of them about, they are as common as
pebbles on a beach. One needs to be really lucky to find a diamond
among them, someone that can actually divide instead of multiply,
but I keep looking.

Androcles makes the same mistake
=============================
Androcles hasn't made a mistake.
Bonehead's mistake is the useless illogical redneck can't ****ing read
anymore than navia could.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...uons/Muons.htm
Scroll the page down, ****head.



According to relativity Bonehead would only live for two years
if he were at rest. Now he's over 80 years old because he keeps
moving, which proves relativity is correct.

Uncle Ben wrote in news:f07e6948-b0f2-4c0f-8baf-
:

On Sep 5, 8:54*am, "Androcles" .
2011 wrote:
"SolomonW" wrote in message

...
| On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:46:12 +0100, Androcles wrote:
|
| and the incredibly
| stupid moron actually COPIES text from my page hoping for a brownie
| point.
|
| I tend to agree that people that copy text from your page are moron.

Oh good.
The text in question is on a photocopy of a page from "Nature"
magazine. *Copying it when anyone can obtain the original or read
my page has to be the epitome of stupidity.

| Nothing will convince you that you are wrong.

Of course, because I am right.

| So why does he bother?

Because he's a stupid bigot and a complete imbecile that can't read
mathematics. There are lots of them about, they are as common as
pebbles on a beach. One needs to be really lucky to find a diamond
among them, someone that can actually divide instead of multiply,
but I keep looking.

Androcles makes the same mistake in his derivation of the "Einstein
expansion," replacing what he thinks is the erroneous "Lorentz
contraction" derivation of Einstein.

He just cannot understand hoe a "moving" frame of reference can be the
rest frame of a moving particle. No wonder he thinks that the
equations mean a "time contraction" to go with his "length expansion."

But all is consistent with his belief in a smallest real number
greater than zero [...]

I believe there is one. I test it out by putting it into ln(x).

Coincidently I have almost reached infinity.