A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chance of shuttle disaster i in 75



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 27th 11, 04:16 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Alan Erskine[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,026
Default Chance of shuttle disaster i in 75

On 28/04/2011 12:49 AM, bob haller wrote:

--


I feel bad for the workers losing their jobs

well honestly for nasa it doesnt matter since the shuttle is ending
and no replacement is coming soon


Again you're wrong.

The workers won't be unemployed for long - with SpaceX and the other
companies developing LV's at an incredible rate of knots, getting
trained workers will be difficult without using ex-NASA employees. This
is demonstrated by most of the upper echelon of SpaceX employment of
late - mostly, if not entirely, ex-NASA.

Also, you're wrong about no shuttle replacement coming soon. Dragon
will probably fly people in the next two-three years.

Boeing is developing the CST-100; then there's Dream Chaser (modified
HL-20, a vehicle I favoured some years ago and would be superb for ferry
work); New Shepard; and also Prometheus from Orbital Science.

Dragon's by far the most advanced of these vehicles where timeline is
concerned and will be in operation before the others even have their
first launch.
  #12  
Old April 28th 11, 09:26 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
The Other Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Chance of shuttle disaster i in 75

On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:07:17 +1000, Alan Erskine
wrote:

On 27/04/2011 1:49 AM, bob haller wrote:


Imagine is 1 in 75 car trips resuled in a disaster accident

Or 1 in 75 airliner trips ended in disaster


Cars don't have a billion parts. Neither do airliners (less than a
million for a large passenger jet). And neither vehicle does 3 G's
during launch; doesn't travel at up to 27,000km/h; doesn't go into
vacuums on a regular basis; and neither vehicle travels through the air
at temperatures of thousands of degrees.


References online indicate the shuttle has about 2.5 million parts,
obviously it depends on how they are counted but I'd hazard a guess
that the vast majority will be as a result of the systems that are
firmly entrenched in the 1970's and if engineered today would drop by
an order of magnitude or more. So still more complex than an airliner
but not by a huge amount.

--
  #13  
Old April 29th 11, 12:39 AM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default Chance of shuttle disaster i in 75

On Apr 28, 4:26*am, The Other Mike
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:07:17 +1000, Alan Erskine

wrote:
On 27/04/2011 1:49 AM, bob haller wrote:


Imagine is 1 in 75 car trips resuled in a disaster accident


Or 1 in 75 airliner trips ended in disaster


Cars don't have a billion parts. *Neither do airliners (less than a
million for a large passenger jet). *And neither vehicle does 3 G's
during launch; doesn't travel at up to 27,000km/h; doesn't go into
vacuums on a regular basis; and neither vehicle travels through the air
at temperatures of thousands of degrees.


References online indicate the shuttle has about 2.5 million parts,
obviously it depends on how they are counted but I'd hazard a guess
that the vast majority will be as a result of the systems that are
firmly entrenched in the 1970's and if engineered today would drop by
an order of magnitude or more. *So still more complex than an airliner
but not by a huge amount.

--


yeah and lack of launch boost escape was a major error, to try and
save some bucks. once they went with solids launch boost escape should
of been mandatory
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 myths about the Challenger shuttle disaster Jim Oberg Space Shuttle 168 February 16th 06 02:06 AM
7 myths about the Challenger shuttle disaster Jim Oberg History 201 February 16th 06 02:06 AM
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery Jim Oberg Space Shuttle 0 July 11th 05 06:32 PM
Shuttle Disaster Could Have Been Averted. I Was Right! Rand Simberg Policy 0 August 23rd 03 11:28 PM
Shuttle-disaster futures market Jorn Barger Space Shuttle 11 August 9th 03 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.