A Hitchiker's Guide to the EINSTEIN HOAX

On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:13:52 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
.. .
|
| It is true to say that every aspect of astronomy has always been and
| still is firmly based on the assumption that all starlight reaching planet
| Earth has traveled at precisely the same speed c, during its entire
journey.
| Now, investigations involving variable stars, along with a radically
revised
| Ballistic Theory of Light strongly suggest that this is not true and that
| the speed of cosmic light is indeed very much dependent on the speed of
its
| source. This paper presents strong evidence for this alternative view and
| suggests that the failure of astronomers to seriously question their
| traditional belief has led to a general misinterpretation of most of the
| illusory data they have collected.

If you think Saturn's rings and moons are some kind of illusion you must be
some kind of nutter.

Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away to
be willusive.

Apart from short period binaries, serious willusions need a few LYs, at
least.

Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?

On Apr 13, 3:02*am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc.) wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:13:52 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
wrote:











"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
.. .
|
| It is true to say that every aspect of astronomy has always been and
| still is firmly based on the assumption that all starlight reaching planet
| Earth has traveled at precisely the same speed c, during its entire
journey.
| Now, investigations involving variable stars, along with a radically
revised
| Ballistic Theory of Light strongly suggest that this is not true and that
| the speed of cosmic light is indeed very much dependent on the speed of
its
| source. This paper presents strong evidence for this alternative view and
| suggests that the failure of astronomers to seriously question their
| traditional belief has led to a general misinterpretation of most of the
| illusory data they have collected.

If you think Saturn's rings and moons are some kind of illusion you must be
some kind of nutter.

Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away to
be willusive.

Apart from short period binaries, serious willusions need a few *LYs, at
least.

Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?


So how come tests on Earth disprove ballistic theory?

On Apr 13, 5:47*am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 13, 3:02*am, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc.) wrote:





On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:13:52 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
wrote:

"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
.. .
|
| It is true to say that every aspect of astronomy has always been and
| still is firmly based on the assumption that all starlight reaching planet
| Earth has traveled at precisely the same speed c, during its entire
journey.
| Now, investigations involving variable stars, along with a radically
revised
| Ballistic Theory of Light strongly suggest that this is not true and that
| the speed of cosmic light is indeed very much dependent on the speed of
its
| source. This paper presents strong evidence for this alternative view and
| suggests that the failure of astronomers to seriously question their
| traditional belief has led to a general misinterpretation of most of the
| illusory data they have collected.

If you think Saturn's rings and moons are some kind of illusion you must be
some kind of nutter.

Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away to
be willusive.

Apart from short period binaries, serious willusions need a few *LYs, at
least.

Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?

So how come tests on Earth disprove ballistic theory?

Einstein, since he was a kind and gentle person, would forgive all you
Einsteinhaters as part of his good and kind and loving nature,
isomorphic to that of jesus Christ himself. DOnt you all feel
ashamed ? I really pity you.

- TBTSLATHOTW

"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:13:52 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
. ..
|
| It is true to say that every aspect of astronomy has always been and
| still is firmly based on the assumption that all starlight reaching
planet
| Earth has traveled at precisely the same speed c, during its entire
journey.
| Now, investigations involving variable stars, along with a radically
revised
| Ballistic Theory of Light strongly suggest that this is not true and
that
| the speed of cosmic light is indeed very much dependent on the speed of
its
| source. This paper presents strong evidence for this alternative view
and
| suggests that the failure of astronomers to seriously question their
| traditional belief has led to a general misinterpretation of most of the
| illusory data they have collected.

If you think Saturn's rings and moons are some kind of illusion you must
be
some kind of nutter.

Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away to
be willusive.

Apart from short period binaries, serious willusions need a few LYs, at
least.

Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?

If the speed of light depended on the speed of Saturn's moons
we'd see them appear further away than they really were when
approaching, in the right place when in front of Saturn, nearer
than they really are when receding and in the right place again
when on the far side of Saturn. This would make the orbit appear
eccentric because it would appear to accelerate on the far side
and appear to decelerate on the near side. However, the velocity
and the position as the moon crossed behind and in front would
be correct.
Why don't you get a life and study basic Kepler's 2nd law and
learn a few facts you clueless *******?

"Sky.Watcher" wrote in message ...
Why don't you get a life and study basic Kepler's 2nd law and
learn a few facts you clueless *******?

Henry/Ralph isn't interested in facts or learning .. he is a proven liar and
fraud .. his only interest is in deceiving others. The world would be
better off without the likes of Henry/Ralph .. hopefully that will be soon.

On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:11:50 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:13:52 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
wrote:


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
|
| It is true to say that every aspect of astronomy has always been and
| still is firmly based on the assumption that all starlight reaching
planet
| Earth has traveled at precisely the same speed c, during its entire
journey.
| Now, investigations involving variable stars, along with a radically
revised
| Ballistic Theory of Light strongly suggest that this is not true and
that
| the speed of cosmic light is indeed very much dependent on the speed of
its
| source. This paper presents strong evidence for this alternative view
and
| suggests that the failure of astronomers to seriously question their
| traditional belief has led to a general misinterpretation of most of the
| illusory data they have collected.

If you think Saturn's rings and moons are some kind of illusion you must
be
some kind of nutter.

Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away to
be willusive.

Apart from short period binaries, serious willusions need a few LYs, at
least.

Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?

If the speed of light depended on the speed of Saturn's moons
we'd see them appear further away than they really were when
approaching, in the right place when in front of Saturn, nearer
than they really are when receding and in the right place again
when on the far side of Saturn. This would make the orbit appear
eccentric because it would appear to accelerate on the far side
and appear to decelerate on the near side. However, the velocity
and the position as the moon crossed behind and in front would
be correct.

....and that's what we see.

Why don't you get a life and study basic Kepler's 2nd law and
learn a few facts you clueless *******?

Why don't you do a few simple sums.

Light from Saturn takes about 5000 seconds to reach Earth.
Rhea's orbit speed is around 9km/s or 3E-5c.
The light travel time anomaly caused by c+v is 0.15 seconds.
.....Less for Titan.

Do you really think an Earth telescope can detect a 1.3km change in a moon's
position when it is coming directly towards us?

"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
news | On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:11:50 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| .. .
| On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:13:52 +0100, "Sky.Watcher"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| ...
| |
| | It is true to say that every aspect of astronomy has always been and
| | still is firmly based on the assumption that all starlight reaching
| planet
| | Earth has traveled at precisely the same speed c, during its entire
| journey.
| | Now, investigations involving variable stars, along with a radically
| revised
| | Ballistic Theory of Light strongly suggest that this is not true and
| that
| | the speed of cosmic light is indeed very much dependent on the speed
of
| its
| | source. This paper presents strong evidence for this alternative view
| and
| | suggests that the failure of astronomers to seriously question their
| | traditional belief has led to a general misinterpretation of most of
the
| | illusory data they have collected.
|
| If you think Saturn's rings and moons are some kind of illusion you
must
| be
| some kind of nutter.
|
| Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away
to
| be willusive.
|
| Apart from short period binaries, serious willusions need a few LYs,
at
| least.
|
| Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?
|
| If the speed of light depended on the speed of Saturn's moons
| we'd see them appear further away than they really were when
| approaching, in the right place when in front of Saturn, nearer
| than they really are when receding and in the right place again
| when on the far side of Saturn. This would make the orbit appear
| eccentric because it would appear to accelerate on the far side
| and appear to decelerate on the near side. However, the velocity
| and the position as the moon crossed behind and in front would
| be correct.
|
| ...and that's what we see.
|
"Get a life you clueless *******. Saturn is nowhere near far enough away to
be willusive." -- Ralph Rabbidge.
You'd make your mind up whether we can see it or not if you had one, you
clueless *******.


| Why don't you get a life and study basic Kepler's 2nd law and
| learn a few facts you clueless *******?
|
| Why don't you do a few simple sums.
|
| Light from Saturn takes about 5000 seconds to reach Earth.
| Rhea's orbit speed is around 9km/s or 3E-5c.
| The light travel time anomaly caused by c+v is 0.15 seconds.
| ....Less for Titan.
|
| Do you really think an Earth telescope can detect a 1.3km change in a
moon's
| position when it is coming directly towards us?

Yep, it's called doppler shift and computing, not "around 9km/s" and
not "about 5000 seconds".
If we can compute the distance to a nearby star using parallax
the position and time of a Saturnian moon should be a cinch.
What's one light-hour compared to several light-years?

Why don't you do a few simple sums with real data, you clueless *******?

"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message
...
Why don't you study my paper aand learn a few facts?

Why study the paper of a known liar and a fraud like you?