![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 8, 8:00*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
. . . ALL the Press have already put apart the TRUE STORY of the """Google""" Lunar X Prize .......http://x.co/GqFF . anyhow, there are some problems to win this prize . one Falcon-9 costs up to $56 millions but we must add the costs of the rover, the lander and the Earth Departure Stage (the last two not yet developed) for a total price of $65-70 millions (or much more) . but the winner will have only $20 millions (or only $15 millions) and the second team only $5 millions . so, ALL the 21 GLXP teams and, most important, their funding sources, must be ready to LOSE up to $50M (for the winner) or up to $65M (for the second place team) and up to $70M each for ALL the 19 teams that will arrive as 3rd and after the 3rd in this race . so, the TOTAL amount funded and LOST by the 21 teams and their funders will be of up to $1.4 billions!!! . of course, the teams that understand to be unable to win, should stop to run before they launch the rover with a $56M Falcon-9, but, the total money LOST to develop all the rovers, landers and EDS, could anyway be of over $300 millions!!! . also, if two-three of the GLXP teams already have the technology and the funds to develop, build and launch their rovers, that means that, up to 18 of the 21 GLXP teams ALREADY ARE TODAY OUT OF THE RACE, then, this is NOT a TRUE moon-race where all competitors have the SAME chances to win!!! . . . well the entire purpose of the race to to spur innovation, low cost launchers and all sorts of out of the box thinking..... the prize money is just a enticement, because the base costs are so high.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 26c95bc9-f15f-43da-968c-d10023de6940
@q14g2000vbf.googlegroups.com, says... add nuclear fuel and the rover could run 24/7 and the waste heat would help keep it warm during nights And suddenly you've driven the cost so high, it's not affordable anymore. Brilliant! Jeff -- " Solids are a branch of fireworks, not rocketry. :-) :-) ", Henry Spencer 1/28/2011 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gaetanomarano wrote:
ALL the Press have already put apart the TRUE STORY of the """Google""" Lunar X Prize ....... http://x.co/GqFF one Falcon-9 costs up to $56 millions but we must add the costs of the rover, the lander and the Earth Departure Stage (the last two not yet developed) for a total price of $65-70 millions (or much more) . but the winner will have only $20 millions (or only $15 millions) and the second team only $5 millions X-prizes have rarely been about making a profit. I can't think of one team who won an X-prize who made a profit on it. X-prizes are about glory not profit. The X-prise spurs the development of a product or family of products. The profits come in later generations. Glory works very well on the type of person who becomes so rich they can afford to fund entirely new endeavors. That's why X-prizes based on glory work. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Falcon 9 to the moon | Frogwatch[_2_] | Policy | 3 | July 2nd 10 03:00 AM |
Germans heading for the Moon? | Pat Flannery | Policy | 6 | August 15th 09 11:15 AM |
NASA abandons plan to fly new spaceships by 2013 | [email protected] | Policy | 6 | August 14th 08 12:49 PM |
European Mars launch pushed back to 2013 | Gareth Slee | History | 2 | November 11th 06 07:56 AM |