![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay...just $82 million more dollars, and this time we can _guarantee_
you it will be ready to go: http://www.spacenews.com/civil/11012...need-cash.html Sure makes you hope the landing system is going to work right, doesn't it? Ah.. didn't the two MER rovers come in at under $100 million together? And this thing is going to come in at around $2.5 _billion_? And the fun part is of course MSL uses a radioisotope power supply unlike the MER's solar arrays; so dust-removing whirlwinds or not this suckers croaks inside of a year. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mars Science Laboratory article in L.A. Times | Matt Wiser | History | 4 | March 6th 08 02:42 AM |
Update: Mars Rover / STS-115 /NASA Science /Expedition 14 | John | Space Station | 6 | October 7th 06 06:53 PM |
Mars Rover Science Team Diary Entries | Scott Hedrick | History | 0 | August 13th 05 04:41 AM |
Mars Rover Finally Gets Back on Track | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 4 | June 10th 05 01:07 PM |
Science Names Mars Rover Mission Science Program as Breakthrough of the Year | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 16th 04 09:22 PM |