Where is the matter Einstein says velocity creates?

On Dec 15, 8:22*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Dec 14, 6:36*pm, PD wrote:



On Dec 14, 4:04*pm, PD wrote:

On Dec 14, 3:51*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 14, 1:55*pm, PD wrote:

Folks: *Paul Draperbegin_of_the_skype_highlighting*****end_of_t he_skype_highlighting, the airhead, persona non grata, persona non
brain, has STRUCK OUT on science for over four years. *Now, he has
become a self-appointed expert on Patents. *Yet, he himself has none.
The reason he can't find anything about my major floor system
invention, is because such probably predated the computerized data
base. *I am not concerned in the least whether PD, the leach, parasite
DUNCE, considers me to be a liar. *He has never made a '+new post' on
any news group in over four years that he has pestered me. *His only
motives in life are angry, negative ones. *The only "warmth" that will
ever be directed toward PD is when he BURNS in Hell for eternity! *—
NE —

Not so, John.
1. The computerized database includes all patents since 1790 and full-
text patent reports since 1976. Unless your patent was filed before
1790....
2. I've made a significant number of new posts, regardless of your
inability to find ANYONE'S new posts other than your own.
3. You say I have pestered you for "over four years". The first time I
responded to any of your posts was February 16, 2007. You'll note that
is less than four years ago.

Ah, correction -- February 14, 2007. Still less than four years ago.

If you make three errors of fact in one short paragraph, and you do
this on top of lying about a patent you do not hold on a process or
product for which there is no public information whatsoever, then you
shoot your own credibility right in the foot, John.

You may foam and blather that I'm going to hell for not supporting you
with warmth and positivity, John, but your blatant abuse of the truth
and persistent and malicious lying is going to land you there well
ahead of me.

On Dec 13, 8:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Dec 13, 10:45*am, PD wrote:

Folks: *PD, the PNG & PNB, is the sneaky leach who trolls the NET
seeking dirt on anyone he is jealous of. *My Plen-E-Air Slab floor
system manages to get the entire electrical and mechanical supply
services for a commercial office building floor to fit within a 12"
thick structural, poured-in-place slab. *The return air is within the
twelve inch space between the suspended ceiling and the bottom of the
structural slab. *The recessed light fixtures fit within the latter
12" space.

Conventional floor systems, such as the fated World Trade Center
Buildings used (about) 36" deep metal trusses, that had ****-poor
sprayed-on fireproofing. *The total depth, floor-to-ceiling, was about
five humongous feet of essentially wasted space. *When those planes
crashed into the buildings, the trusses got knocked sideways and the
fireproofing mostly fell off. *Structural steel exposed to high heat
will soften to the point of loosing its load carrying ability. *That's
why the two buildings pancaked to the ground.

If my Plen-E-Air Slab floor system had been used on those buildings,
the immediate cost saving would have been about 15% less (total
building!). *And there would be about a 10% increase in the leasable
floor space per building, because fewer elevators would be required to
serve the buildings (the floors would be closer together, reduces the
travel times); and the area taken up by fire stairways would be
considerably less, for the same reasons. *A more compact building
reduces the heating and cooling loads by about 15%, and cuts the cost
of the building foundations another 15%, plus making buildings more
resistant to winds and to earthquakes.

If those same planes had hit a building constructed with my Plen-E-Air
Slab, the edge-on rigidity of the floor slabs would have forced the
planes to go skidding in one side of the buildings and out the other.
Even if the full fuel load of a jet got spilled on a floor, the slabs
would still have a massive 4-hr. fire resistance. *Depending upon the
structural layout, it would be likely that one or more columns would
be knocked out. *But by the simple expedient of having "mechanical/
structural" super floors about every ten floors, it would be possible
to have all the columns be backed-up with super strong cables that
would support a slab from ABOVE if a column were to be knocked out
below. *Additionally, the sheet metal void former for my system
creates a two-way (reversible loading) capacity. *Though a slab with a
column knocked out would sag a good bit, it should not go pancaking to
the ground. *In short, the two World Trade Center buildings would both
have been back in service about seven years ago!

The above capsule description should be more informative than having
any airhead PNG, like Paul Draper, go on any pointless searches for
dirt. *— NoEinstein —

The point of the search would be to establish your credibility, John,
to see if you can discern the difference between reality and fantasy,
or to see if you're a compulsive liar. If the news is bad on either
score, you see, you will find that your ideas will not meet with much
interest, as no one wants to further the ideas of either liars or
lunatics.

There are no patents listed for either "Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-
directional voided slab", and there are no other patents than the two
previously mentioned under your name. Furthermore, a Google search for
"Plen-E-Air" or "Omni-directional voided slab" return no hits other
than the posts here in which you mentioned them.

A liar makes his own dirt, John. I have no need to dig any of it up,
when you shovel it vigorously yourself. I would not have known to
check your claims if you'd never made the false claims in the first
place.

You're in the position you find yourself, by virtue of your own slimy,
dishonest, sociopathic, delusional actions, John. You really need to
take a hard look in the mirror this afternoon and ask yourself why you
are not seeking help. I can assure you that I'm in no way jealous of a
psychotic loner.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: *Only someone mentally ill, like PD, would hold me responsible
for recalling when he started pestering me.

I didn't make the statement. You did. I do hold you responsible for
the truth of statements YOU make.

.. within two months out of
four years. *That two month error, for PD, suggests my
"imperfection". *I'll bet that he couldn't guess within two months
when he started pestering, me. *So, PD is the imperfect one, don't you
think. *— NE —

I didn't guess. I *checked*. That's the difference between you and me.
You GUESS and pass it off as truth. I CHECK before making a statement
I allege as truth.

Your credibility is shot because your statements are guesses,
suppositions, idle comments, even when they are about yourself. You
claim you have patents you do not have.

By the way, the three remaining patents you have in application stage
are for an oil dipstick, a clip for holding shoelaces, and a catheter
for men with prostate problems.