![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jackie" wrote in message
news:YSudb.451114$cF.144774@rwcrnsc53... Beyond the portability and transport issues, your choice of viewing instrument should probably be dictated by what you want to look at. For planets, star clusters, doubles, and extended deep sky objects, a nice, 5" instrument will do a nice job. One caveat is that Maks and SCTs take awhile to cool down, especially if you bring them to the cold outside from a warm inside. Best if you can keep those type of scopes in an unheated garage or shed, so you can cut down the cooling time. Just to echo another response, once you're into shed or garage storage solutions, think wheels. I've been praising this setup on saa for over a year. A simple $40 handtruck is enough to haul the XT10. For $50 or thereabouts I put together a two-by-four wheelie bar for my 8" SCT. Cooldown and setup/breakdown become a non-issue. But for any solution that doesn't include external storage, there's no doubt in my mind that a 4" or 5" refractor rules. Although something that helps, is to store the 5" SCT or Mak in the car trunk. There small, so you can store one of each. ;-) -Stephen |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- To reply, remove the "z" if one appears in my address "Stephen Paul" wrote in message ... "Jackie" wrote in message news:YSudb.451114$cF.144774@rwcrnsc53... Beyond the portability and transport issues, your choice of viewing instrument should probably be dictated by what you want to look at. For planets, star clusters, doubles, and extended deep sky objects, a nice, 5" instrument will do a nice job. One caveat is that Maks and SCTs take awhile to cool down, especially if you bring them to the cold outside from a warm inside. Best if you can keep those type of scopes in an unheated garage or shed, so you can cut down the cooling time. Just to echo another response, once you're into shed or garage storage solutions, think wheels. I've been praising this setup on saa for over a year. A simple $40 handtruck is enough to haul the XT10. For $50 or thereabouts I put together a two-by-four wheelie bar for my 8" SCT. Cooldown and setup/breakdown become a non-issue. But for any solution that doesn't include external storage, there's no doubt in my mind that a 4" or 5" refractor rules. Although something that helps, is to store the 5" SCT or Mak in the car trunk. There small, so you can store one of each. ;-) -Stephen Stephen makes a key point here. And I fully concur. I, too, have been preaching this for a long time. NEVER underestimate how much something as simple as a hand truck or a wheelie bar can make your setup prior to observing. One of these methods (and I use both methods, depending on the scope), can make even a large scope a grab and go. A couple suggestions: If you buy a hand truck, make sure it has pneumatic tires, and NOT hard rubber tires. You'll be AMAZED at how much difference THAT will make. And if you make or buy a wheelie bar, make sure you use BIG wheels. The JMI Wheeley Bar I use on my 10" SCT has the optional 5" wheels; but you can make your own wheelie bar using these same wheels, if you prefer the do-it-yourself approach... The larger wheels make it a one hander moving things around in the house, and are far smoother on uneven ground outside... I can have my 13" ready to observe in about three or four minutes INCLUDING collimation check. Same with my 10" SCT. Well, I can't do a CRITICAL collimation check on either scope until I begin observing, because this is done with a star test, but I can see, within a very small amount, if the anything has moved since my last observing run. I can't set up my 94mm APO any faster, and either of these other scopes will show detail in objects the 94mm will barely SHOW. Don't get me wrong; I LOVE that APO, but aperture does win... The only issue with either of the larger scopes is how close they are to thermal equilibrium when they get set into place... Otherwise they are ready to go. So many folks talk about how hard it is to set up their scopes, especially in the 8" and up range, but quite often, they simply haven't thought through what it would take to make their setup a snap... Most of the time, it's FAR easier than one might think... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So many folks talk about how hard it is to set up their scopes, especially in the 8" and up range, but quite often, they simply haven't thought through what it would take to make their setup a snap... Most of the time, it's FAR easier than one might think... I think that both you and Stephen have made some good points, setup can be easy, even for a large scope, depending off course on where it is stored etc. However, the equations do change significantly when transporting a larger scope to a dark site because if it may require assembly and disassembly. And sometimes, there is just not room for a large scope in the vehicle, too many people/too much junk... A small scope can be just the thing.... jon |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- To reply, remove the "z" if one appears in my address "Jon Isaacs" wrote in message ... So many folks talk about how hard it is to set up their scopes, especially in the 8" and up range, but quite often, they simply haven't thought through what it would take to make their setup a snap... Most of the time, it's FAR easier than one might think... I think that both you and Stephen have made some good points, setup can be easy, even for a large scope, depending off course on where it is stored etc. However, the equations do change significantly when transporting a larger scope to a dark site because if it may require assembly and disassembly. And sometimes, there is just not room for a large scope in the vehicle, too many people/too much junk... Transporting a scope is just a matter of establishing priorities consistent with the scopes you have chosen to use... Starlord, with some help, got that right... It's really no different than choosing the right devices to help move them around at your home. Those same devices will get them to your vehicle, and move them from the vehicle to your place on the observing field or your own little piece of mountain top... I can transport ANY of my scopes in EITHER of my vehicles Mustang GT hatchback, Dodge Dakota Pickup). And all but the 13" will fit in my wife's 300M, as well. A small scope can be just the thing.... Yes they certainly can (I LOVE my APO)!!! But IF YOU WANT IT TO BE, so can a BIG scope... Priorities, and ingenuity. Never disassemble it if you can easily move it in one piece. Always use the right tool for the job... If you don't think you can manage it, I GUARANTEE you never will... jon Jan |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transporting a scope is just a matter of establishing priorities consistent
with the scopes you have chosen to use... Starlord, with some help, got that right... It's really no different than choosing the right devices to help move them around at your home. Those same devices will get them to your vehicle, and move them from the vehicle to your place on the observing field or your own little piece of mountain top... I can transport ANY of my scopes in EITHER of my vehicles Mustang GT hatchback, Dodge Dakota Pickup). And all but the 13" will fit in my wife's 300M, as well. It is true it is about establishing priorities, but often the number one priority is has nothing to do with astronomy. I could fit my 12.5 inch DOB in our 1989 Nissan Sentra. It easily fits in either of our current Escort. But that may not leave room for other equipment. Until a few years ago we used to Car camp with that car doing 2000-3000 mile treks across the Southwest. The car was loaded with a tent, clothes, sleeping bags, ice chest, cooking gear, food, tarps, 3 bicycles (one a tandem) on the roof, wheels, tires, helmets etc. Not really any room for a C8, let alone a large scope. My little 5 inch Cometron Jr. did very nicely for this. So my point is that while a large scope may well fit in a car, it may not leave room for other items of greater priority. jon |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
--
To reply, remove the "z" if one appears in my address "Jon Isaacs" wrote in message ... Transporting a scope is just a matter of establishing priorities consistent with the scopes you have chosen to use... Starlord, with some help, got that right... It's really no different than choosing the right devices to help move them around at your home. Those same devices will get them to your vehicle, and move them from the vehicle to your place on the observing field or your own little piece of mountain top... I can transport ANY of my scopes in EITHER of my vehicles Mustang GT hatchback, Dodge Dakota Pickup). And all but the 13" will fit in my wife's 300M, as well. It is true it is about establishing priorities, but often the number one priority is has nothing to do with astronomy. I could fit my 12.5 inch DOB in our 1989 Nissan Sentra. It easily fits in either of our current Escort. But that may not leave room for other equipment. Until a few years ago we used to Car camp with that car doing 2000-3000 mile treks across the Southwest. The car was loaded with a tent, clothes, sleeping bags, ice chest, cooking gear, food, tarps, 3 bicycles (one a tandem) on the roof, wheels, tires, helmets etc. Not really any room for a C8, let alone a large scope. My little 5 inch Cometron Jr. did very nicely for this. So my point is that while a large scope may well fit in a car, it may not leave room for other items of greater priority. jon I don't disagree with anything you've said. It just doesn't necessarily apply to me, and it may or may not apply to others. As they say, your mileage may vary... Take care! Jan |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't disagree with anything you've said. It just doesn't necessarily
apply to me, and it may or may not apply to others. As they say, your mileage may vary... Take care! Jan I don't claim that it applies to anyone other than me. I just use myself as an example of someone whose priorities are such sometimes a taking a small scope is the wise choice. jon |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want to look though the eyepiece and actually see something I
would go with the 10" DOB. Having looked through an ETX-90 my thoughts were 'why bother'. I suspect the 125 is a bit better than the 90 though. The Orion 10" is a bit more portable than my 10" Discovery PDHQ. The addition of 'push to' encoder capability for $150.00 makes the Orion that much more attractive. Good luck whichever way you go. mjd |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transporting a scope is just a matter of establishing priorities
consistent with the scopes you have chosen to use... Truth! john |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading in the bathroom when I ran across an item written by
otnow (Jskies187) on 01 Oct 2003 07:36:38 GMT, which said: Transporting a scope is just a matter of establishing priorities consistent with the scopes you have chosen to use... Truth! Gobbledegook! ------------- Beady's 11th Law of Social Harmonics: "Your spouse is precisely the kind of person someone like you would choose to marry." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Proposed Theoretical Adjustments to Project Orion | Diginomics | Policy | 4 | April 21st 04 01:25 AM |
In praise of Meade | Starstuffed | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | October 4th 03 08:20 PM |
Meade SN-8 vs Celestron C8-NGT? | Al | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | September 5th 03 01:30 AM |
Comments on Meade and Orion 8" Reflectors Wanted | Greg Elder | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | August 10th 03 03:47 AM |