Time Rip for my Fusion Machine

Here's a good average insolation map for flat panel receivers
http://www.soda-is.com/img/carte_Ed_13_world.pdf

I think there is good reason to believe that many of us alive today
have the potential to live as long as they like

http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_g...oid_aging.html

As we develop space faring technology we will see a vast reversal of
our present world. One where people and ideas are in short supply,
while resources and capabilities are in nearly infinite supply - and
the value of every single human being is nearly infinite as a result.



On Jul 10, 7:47*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
Don't tell me, tell it to Bert.

I 100% agree that our sun is way under utilized. *Too bad you have
such limited connections as to taking any actions that would make Big
Energy sweat bullets, whereas instead they seem to be laughing at us,
especially laughing at those of us certified as BP's "small people".

On Jul 10, 11:46*am, William Mook wrote:

There is a safe reliable natural fusion reactor that produces 22
trillion times as much energy as the entire human race uses today. *We
call it THE SUN!

At present photovoltaic systems cost $1,550 per square meter and
produce only 200 watts when the sun shines. *Even in sunny spots they
produce only 60 watts per square meter when averaged over the course
of a year. *This is not competitive.

I assume that's the all-inclusive installed and grid connected cost
per square meter, because commercial grade panels are on the market at
as little as $2.25/watt, and some of those at under $3.00/watt will
have their annual average close to 75 w/m2, and the best ones should
exceed 100 w/m2..



My approach collects and concentrates incident light using ultra-low-
cost lens and mirror technologies to 5,000x ambient intensity found on
Earth. * Terrestrial solar energy can be used to produce hydrogen from
water for less than $608 per metric ton when this is done.

That's because high-temperature electrolysis (HTE) done by MEMS based
CPV cells inside a water-filled cavity shaped to focus and direct the
sunlight costs only $0.10 per square meter and the HTE process itself
produces 700 watts per square meter of sunlight captured in this way
when the sun shines. *This averages 200 watts per square meter when
averaged over the course of a year. *The primary collector costs only
$0.10 per square meter while the MEMS device costs $22,500 per square
meter. *Only 2 sq cm of MEMS device is used per square meter of
primary collector, so only $4.50 is added per square meter of primary
collector.

http://www.youtube.com/user/harrymoo...33/dbWNnVsBhOg

With hydrogen made in this way, hydrogen costing less than any other
primary fuel is now available. *Utility scale energy storage is the
next issue. *This is made possible using any of the following
technologies;

(1) Gaseous hydrogen stored in geological formations (depleted gas and
oil wells) 15 grams/liter - 25 grams/liter
* * (a) Hydrogen mobilizes stationary oil and natural gas reserves
increasing output of 'empty' wells
(2) Liquid hydrogen stored in ultra-insulating cryogenic containers
with cryo-coolers 70 grams/liter
* * *(a) Slush Hydrogen - 86 grams/liter
(3) Conversion and reforming into an intermediate hydrogen rich liquid
* * (a) Ammonia - N2 + 3 H2 --- *2 NH3
* * * * * (i) Liquid Ammonia * 151 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) Ammonia/Water solutions *70 grams/liter - 100 grams/
liter
* * * * * (iii) Ammonia salt solutions *100 grams/liter
* * * * * * * * *http://www.netpublikationer.dk/um/65.../chapter12.htm
* * (b) Formic Acid - HCOOH --- CO2 + H2
* * * * * (i) Liquid Formic Acid * 62 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) 85% Formic Acid in water *53 grams/liter

In today's market-place the highest best use of low-cost solar
hydrogen made from water is to make fresh water from sea water where
needed, make low-cost ammonia fertilizer where needed, convert coal
fired power plants to burning hydrogen in an emission free process,
and take part of the stranded coal, and make synthetic crude oil, and
put the oil companies out of business - all while accumulating lots
and lots of money for the next step;

Then we use as much coal and other hydrocarbons as it takes for making
HTP, because Mook solar energy or that of its green hydrogen are not
allowed to make HTP.



Buying the major aerospace companies around the world, divesting them
of their space faring assets (which are money losers) and selling the
more profitable military and aircraft divisions - keeping the space
faring divisions as a single super space company. *Then, use those
assets to create a fully reusable heavy lift launcher fleet - of five
vehicles

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/E...cribd.com/doc/...

With a five day turn-around the fleet is capable of putting up 695
tons into LEO - each day.

With this capability create an increasingly sophisticated set of space
assets to capture a wide range of markets on Earth, including
communications;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I81ogcX3ONY

Using an array of 800+ satellites to paint millions of contiguous
cells across the entire surface of the Earth. *Each satellite is solar
powered, and has a large phased array antenna system. *It paints
thousands of stationary doppler corrected virtual cells across the
Earth, and each satellite operates as an optical router to six peta-
bit open optical laser links to nearest neighbor satellites. *Each
satellite overlaps its neighbors and hands off cells as they pass over
head providing a seamless broadband capability across the planet.
With this core capability I can provide basic services, telephone,
radio, television, internet; and advanced capabilities - tele-
presence, tele-robotics, etc.

Off-world Energy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWiXDu64c0g

Large concentrators on Earth orbit focus sunlight to 1,600x ambient
intensity - to CPV cells adapted for use in vacuum. *The CPV cells
drive an advanced MEMS based Free Electron Laser (FEL) of very high
efficiency. *The CPV/FEL combination delivers over 50% of its energy
at any desired wavelength to receivers on the ground. *The initial
system is orbited and solar sailing techniques are used to fly the 5
km diameter system from LEO to GEO in a few months. *There it delivers
8,000 beams at 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

A more advanced system consists of two 500 meter components - that
consist of MEMS units only - a generator and a receiver. *The first
test unit flies the generator to L1 between Earth and Sun. *The second
test unit flies the receiver to GEO - where it receives the UV beam
created by the generator, and uses the UV energy to create an IR beam
that produces 220 beams of 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

Once the test is successfully completed another pair is orbited - and
using solar sailing techniques the receiver here flies to GEO while
the generator flies to Jupiter. *In passing Jupiter the receiver uses
gravity boost to drop directly into the Sun - at 3.75 million km light
pressure exceeds gravity pressure (by reorienting the space craft) and
over 220 GW of UV energy is beamed to the receiver at GEO. *This is
reformed by the receiver into 22 million 10 kW beams - targeted to
mobile as well as stationary receivers.

Which revolutionizes transportation systems on Earth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxV2F...utube.com/watc....

Putting the present owners of primary fuels out of business.

Never fear, the carbon compounds combined with ultra-low-cost abundant
energy creates vast nw uses for low these compounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMefZ...tube.com/watch....

While expanding the use of asteroid materials as feedstock for
orbiting factories, farms and forests. *these factories farms and
forests on orbit create all products via tele-operated robots and then
distribute them where needed anywhere in the solar system.

Humanity today uses 28 billion tons of raw materials. *With 8 billion
people consuming at the rate of millionaires today this will rise to
400 billion tons of raw materials. * To maintain this rate of transfer
from the asteroid belt requires 840 trillion watts today rising to 12
quadrillion watts when *8 billion people consume at millionaire
rates. * A generator array 120 km across operating at 3.75 million km
from the Sun is sufficient to produce the power needed continuously
for billions of years. *The richest 1% of the asteroid belt has
sufficient resources to supply humanity for 90,000 years at the higher
rate.

Today humanity 6.8 billion people produce $70 trillion with the
materials and energy it has available to it. *By making use of solar
energy in this way, and making use of asteroid belt in this way, along
with space based factories and communications to implement advanced
tele presence and telerobotics, this could easily rise to $8
quadrillion per year. * This could be done in 25 years - a 20% per
annum compounded rate of growth in per capita income.

While 25% of us make do with less than $1 per day, while 45% of us
make do with less than $2 per day, and 10 million of us make do with
$2,000 per day, and 1,000 of us make do with $2,000,000 per day - we
can expect that with profound fundamental growth in our productive
capabilities by growing our fundamental energy and material and
productive capacities - that the poorest of us humans will make do in
25 years with $200 per day while the richest of us will make do with
$200,000,000 per day - keeping nearly the same relative distribution -
all in real 2008 dollars. * Since most work we take for granted today
will be automated, and since $200 per day amounts to $73,000 per year
- and 7.3% interest on accumulated funds is high by today's standards,
$73k per year revenue without having to do substantial work as we know
it, amounts to earning interest on $1 million in assets. * That is,
the poorest of us would be equivalent to millionaires today - and most
would be equivalent to billionaires and more. *The richest of us will
be more powerful and capable than nation-states today. *Nation states
will undergo a revolutionary transformation into something that is
quite controversial to talk about - universal human services based on
a thoroughgoing analysis of human condition and capabilities - and
shaping the epistimology and collective consciousness of all humans in
a seamless non-intrusive manner that uses the highest technical
capabilities of that era - to maintain a least restrictive environment
for all.

Demographics across cultures today indicate that such a global
transformation will lead to a reduction in human birth rates so that
zero population growth is achieved in 10 years - and we end up with a
0.1% decline per year after peaking at 8 billion people in 25 years
(2035). *Demographics also indicated that 2% of us each year will move
off world by that time depopulating the world in a few generations.

Prior to 2035 fewer than 1 million people will be living off world -
mostly early adopters on the Moon and Mars, and long-term contractees
for various asteroid development companies, and most of them on Earth
orbit.

The first 1 billion people will be living off-world by 2040.

The number of people living in space will equal the number of people
living on Earth (3.8 billion each) by 2059 - the 90th anniversary of
the Apollo moon landings.

The last 1 billion people will be living off-world by 2077.

The last person permanently inhabiting Earth's surface with everyone
living off-world by 2083.

At that point there will be two major projects that will be of
interest;

*(1) Human re-creation project
*(2) Next natural intelligence project.

The first is to use a variety of forensic, biological, nano and
quantum techniques to characterize and recreate the personality
history and memories of every single human being back to the beginning
of time. *This will reflect on a far grander scale - and make use of-
the Human Genome Project - of the late 1990s. *In 2090 the goal will
be to re-create all humans who ever lived (96.1 billion people)

http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~ramsey/People.html

Since we have the resources, and capabilities to support all at very
high standards (particularly after the advent of strong AI and
robotics along with nano-tech)

The wealth of a society - given adequate material and energy resources
is a reflection of the ideas of its people. *A larger population is
richer than a smaller one under these conditions. *A freer population
is richer than a constrained one under these conditions. *With lowered
population growth rates - and the end of aging as a death process

http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_g...oid_aging.html

This is a natural thing for humanity to do under the conditions
imagined here.

The second project evolves from our present impulse to preserve nature
at the expense of industry. *By moving industry off world, and also
all humans off world the ability to engage in this impulse will grow.
The benefits of doing so will grow also - as we learn more of the vast
knowledge encoded in the multi-billion year history of the global
organism. *We will use this as a resource for designing improved space
environments for thousands of years to come. *Since ETI is unlikely to
be nearer than a few dozen galactic distances away (100 million light
years) and new TI may evolve within periods far shorter *(5 million
years), and facing the limitations of artificial intelligence (AI)
that is fully developed, its also natural to conclude that humans in
2090 and beyond will look at the empty Earth and want to return it to
its pre human condition and set up conditions so that the NEXT
TERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE evolves in response to the vast knowledge
contained in the global organism that spawned us.

This will be part of a continuing development of space travel
technologies to expand human settlements beyond the solar system and
part of a continuing expansion in capabilities.

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AFTER ALL ARE MILLIONAIRES (and more!)

YEAR *SPACE * * * * *EARTH

2035 * *160,000,000 * * 7,840,000,000
2036 * *319,840,000 * * 7,672,160,000
2037 * *479,520,160 * * 7,504,487,840
2038 * *639,040,639 * * 7,336,983,352
2039 * *798,401,599 * * 7,169,646,368

2040 * * * 957,603,197 *7,002,476,722
2041 * *1,116,645,594 * 6,835,474,245
2042 * *1,275,528,948 * 6,668,638,771
2043 * *1,434,253,419 * 6,501,970,132
2044 * *1,592,819,166 * 6,335,468,162

2045 * *1,751,226,347 * 6,169,132,694
2046 * *1,909,475,120 * 6,002,963,561
2047 * *2,067,565,645 * 5,836,960,598
2048 * *2,225,498,080 * 5,671,123,637
2049 * *2,383,272,582 * 5,505,452,513

Turning Earth back into an Eden sanctuary that's ideal for
accommodating whatever's left of its vast biodiversity (of which we
humans are currently 1 ppm of), is a good plan for those of us that
are immortal and wealthy as hell.

Are you going to live to see 2035?

Are you going to be in any condition to lead us out of the current
mess that religions and politics has gotten us into?

*~ BG

On Jul 12, 7:27*pm, William Mook wrote:
Here's a good average insolation map for flat panel receivershttp://www.soda-is.com/img/carte_Ed_13_world.pdf

I think there is good reason to believe that many of us alive today
have the potential to live as long as they like

http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_g...oid_aging.html

As we develop space faring technology we will see a vast reversal of
our present world. *One where people and ideas are in short supply,
while resources and capabilities are in nearly infinite supply - and
the value of every single human being is nearly infinite as a result.

On Jul 10, 7:47*pm, Brad Guth wrote:



Don't tell me, tell it to Bert.

I 100% agree that our sun is way under utilized. *Too bad you have
such limited connections as to taking any actions that would make Big
Energy sweat bullets, whereas instead they seem to be laughing at us,
especially laughing at those of us certified as BP's "small people".

On Jul 10, 11:46*am, William Mook wrote:

There is a safe reliable natural fusion reactor that produces 22
trillion times as much energy as the entire human race uses today. *We
call it THE SUN!

At present photovoltaic systems cost $1,550 per square meter and
produce only 200 watts when the sun shines. *Even in sunny spots they
produce only 60 watts per square meter when averaged over the course
of a year. *This is not competitive.

I assume that's the all-inclusive installed and grid connected cost
per square meter, because commercial grade panels are on the market at
as little as $2.25/watt, and some of those at under $3.00/watt will
have their annual average close to 75 w/m2, and the best ones should
exceed 100 w/m2..

My approach collects and concentrates incident light using ultra-low-
cost lens and mirror technologies to 5,000x ambient intensity found on
Earth. * Terrestrial solar energy can be used to produce hydrogen from
water for less than $608 per metric ton when this is done.

That's because high-temperature electrolysis (HTE) done by MEMS based
CPV cells inside a water-filled cavity shaped to focus and direct the
sunlight costs only $0.10 per square meter and the HTE process itself
produces 700 watts per square meter of sunlight captured in this way
when the sun shines. *This averages 200 watts per square meter when
averaged over the course of a year. *The primary collector costs only
$0.10 per square meter while the MEMS device costs $22,500 per square
meter. *Only 2 sq cm of MEMS device is used per square meter of
primary collector, so only $4.50 is added per square meter of primary
collector.

http://www.youtube.com/user/harrymoo...33/dbWNnVsBhOg

With hydrogen made in this way, hydrogen costing less than any other
primary fuel is now available. *Utility scale energy storage is the
next issue. *This is made possible using any of the following
technologies;

(1) Gaseous hydrogen stored in geological formations (depleted gas and
oil wells) 15 grams/liter - 25 grams/liter
* * (a) Hydrogen mobilizes stationary oil and natural gas reserves
increasing output of 'empty' wells
(2) Liquid hydrogen stored in ultra-insulating cryogenic containers
with cryo-coolers 70 grams/liter
* * *(a) Slush Hydrogen - 86 grams/liter
(3) Conversion and reforming into an intermediate hydrogen rich liquid
* * (a) Ammonia - N2 + 3 H2 --- *2 NH3
* * * * * (i) Liquid Ammonia * 151 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) Ammonia/Water solutions *70 grams/liter - 100 grams/
liter
* * * * * (iii) Ammonia salt solutions *100 grams/liter
* * * * * * * * *http://www.netpublikationer.dk/um/65.../chapter12.htm
* * (b) Formic Acid - HCOOH --- CO2 + H2
* * * * * (i) Liquid Formic Acid * 62 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) 85% Formic Acid in water *53 grams/liter

In today's market-place the highest best use of low-cost solar
hydrogen made from water is to make fresh water from sea water where
needed, make low-cost ammonia fertilizer where needed, convert coal
fired power plants to burning hydrogen in an emission free process,
and take part of the stranded coal, and make synthetic crude oil, and
put the oil companies out of business - all while accumulating lots
and lots of money for the next step;

Then we use as much coal and other hydrocarbons as it takes for making
HTP, because Mook solar energy or that of its green hydrogen are not
allowed to make HTP.

Buying the major aerospace companies around the world, divesting them
of their space faring assets (which are money losers) and selling the
more profitable military and aircraft divisions - keeping the space
faring divisions as a single super space company. *Then, use those
assets to create a fully reusable heavy lift launcher fleet - of five
vehicles

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/E...cribd.com/doc/....

With a five day turn-around the fleet is capable of putting up 695
tons into LEO - each day.

With this capability create an increasingly sophisticated set of space
assets to capture a wide range of markets on Earth, including
communications;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I81ogcX3ONY

Using an array of 800+ satellites to paint millions of contiguous
cells across the entire surface of the Earth. *Each satellite is solar
powered, and has a large phased array antenna system. *It paints
thousands of stationary doppler corrected virtual cells across the
Earth, and each satellite operates as an optical router to six peta-
bit open optical laser links to nearest neighbor satellites. *Each
satellite overlaps its neighbors and hands off cells as they pass over
head providing a seamless broadband capability across the planet.
With this core capability I can provide basic services, telephone,
radio, television, internet; and advanced capabilities - tele-
presence, tele-robotics, etc.

Off-world Energy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWiXDu64c0g

Large concentrators on Earth orbit focus sunlight to 1,600x ambient
intensity - to CPV cells adapted for use in vacuum. *The CPV cells
drive an advanced MEMS based Free Electron Laser (FEL) of very high
efficiency. *The CPV/FEL combination delivers over 50% of its energy
at any desired wavelength to receivers on the ground. *The initial
system is orbited and solar sailing techniques are used to fly the 5
km diameter system from LEO to GEO in a few months. *There it delivers
8,000 beams at 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

A more advanced system consists of two 500 meter components - that
consist of MEMS units only - a generator and a receiver. *The first
test unit flies the generator to L1 between Earth and Sun. *The second
test unit flies the receiver to GEO - where it receives the UV beam
created by the generator, and uses the UV energy to create an IR beam
that produces 220 beams of 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

Once the test is successfully completed another pair is orbited - and
using solar sailing techniques the receiver here flies to GEO while
the generator flies to Jupiter. *In passing Jupiter the receiver uses
gravity boost to drop directly into the Sun - at 3.75 million km light
pressure exceeds gravity pressure (by reorienting the space craft) and
over 220 GW of UV energy is beamed to the receiver at GEO. *This is
reformed by the receiver into 22 million 10 kW beams - targeted to
mobile as well as stationary receivers.

Which revolutionizes transportation systems on Earth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxV2F...utube.com/watc...

Putting the present owners of primary fuels out of business.

Never fear, the carbon compounds combined with ultra-low-cost abundant
energy creates vast nw uses for low these compounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMefZ...tube.com/watch...

While expanding the use of asteroid materials as feedstock for
orbiting factories, farms and forests. *these factories farms and
forests on orbit create all products via tele-operated robots and then
distribute them where needed anywhere in the solar system.

Humanity today uses 28 billion tons of raw materials. *With 8 billion
people consuming at the rate of millionaires today this will rise to
400 billion tons of raw materials. * To maintain this rate of transfer
from the asteroid belt requires 840 trillion watts today rising to 12
quadrillion watts when *8 billion people consume at millionaire
rates. * A generator array 120 km across operating at 3.75 million km
from the Sun is sufficient to produce the power needed continuously
for billions of years. *The richest 1% of the asteroid belt has
sufficient resources to supply humanity for 90,000 years at the higher
rate.

Today humanity 6.8 billion people produce $70 trillion with the
materials and energy it has available to it. *By making use of solar
energy in this way, and making use of asteroid belt in this way, along
with space based factories and communications to implement advanced
tele presence and telerobotics, this could easily rise to $8
quadrillion per year. * This could be done in 25 years - a 20% per
annum compounded rate of growth in per capita income.

While 25% of us make do with less than $1 per day, while 45% of us
make do with less than $2 per day, and 10 million of us make do with
$2,000 per day, and 1,000 of us make do with $2,000,000 per day - we
can expect that with profound fundamental growth in our productive
capabilities by growing

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

To Ya All Confinement by magnetic field such as the Tokamak
works,but it is self destructive. This is what I told Columbia U I
was right and they wasted time and big bucks. My Pulse Fusion Machine
does away with this heat problem. It has no torus.made of lithium
metal. It needs no 9 transformers Yes it has a helium exhaust. Yes
the machine is very big and costly TreBert

On Jul 12, 7:27*pm, William Mook wrote:
Here's a good average insolation map for flat panel receivershttp://www.soda-is.com/img/carte_Ed_13_world.pdf

I think there is good reason to believe that many of us alive today
have the potential to live as long as they like

http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_g...oid_aging.html

As we develop space faring technology we will see a vast reversal of
our present world. *One where people and ideas are in short supply,
while resources and capabilities are in nearly infinite supply - and
the value of every single human being is nearly infinite as a result.

On Jul 10, 7:47*pm, Brad Guth wrote:



Don't tell me, tell it to Bert.

I 100% agree that our sun is way under utilized. *Too bad you have
such limited connections as to taking any actions that would make Big
Energy sweat bullets, whereas instead they seem to be laughing at us,
especially laughing at those of us certified as BP's "small people".

On Jul 10, 11:46*am, William Mook wrote:

There is a safe reliable natural fusion reactor that produces 22
trillion times as much energy as the entire human race uses today. *We
call it THE SUN!

At present photovoltaic systems cost $1,550 per square meter and
produce only 200 watts when the sun shines. *Even in sunny spots they
produce only 60 watts per square meter when averaged over the course
of a year. *This is not competitive.

I assume that's the all-inclusive installed and grid connected cost
per square meter, because commercial grade panels are on the market at
as little as $2.25/watt, and some of those at under $3.00/watt will
have their annual average close to 75 w/m2, and the best ones should
exceed 100 w/m2..

My approach collects and concentrates incident light using ultra-low-
cost lens and mirror technologies to 5,000x ambient intensity found on
Earth. * Terrestrial solar energy can be used to produce hydrogen from
water for less than $608 per metric ton when this is done.

That's because high-temperature electrolysis (HTE) done by MEMS based
CPV cells inside a water-filled cavity shaped to focus and direct the
sunlight costs only $0.10 per square meter and the HTE process itself
produces 700 watts per square meter of sunlight captured in this way
when the sun shines. *This averages 200 watts per square meter when
averaged over the course of a year. *The primary collector costs only
$0.10 per square meter while the MEMS device costs $22,500 per square
meter. *Only 2 sq cm of MEMS device is used per square meter of
primary collector, so only $4.50 is added per square meter of primary
collector.

http://www.youtube.com/user/harrymoo...33/dbWNnVsBhOg

With hydrogen made in this way, hydrogen costing less than any other
primary fuel is now available. *Utility scale energy storage is the
next issue. *This is made possible using any of the following
technologies;

(1) Gaseous hydrogen stored in geological formations (depleted gas and
oil wells) 15 grams/liter - 25 grams/liter
* * (a) Hydrogen mobilizes stationary oil and natural gas reserves
increasing output of 'empty' wells
(2) Liquid hydrogen stored in ultra-insulating cryogenic containers
with cryo-coolers 70 grams/liter
* * *(a) Slush Hydrogen - 86 grams/liter
(3) Conversion and reforming into an intermediate hydrogen rich liquid
* * (a) Ammonia - N2 + 3 H2 --- *2 NH3
* * * * * (i) Liquid Ammonia * 151 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) Ammonia/Water solutions *70 grams/liter - 100 grams/
liter
* * * * * (iii) Ammonia salt solutions *100 grams/liter
* * * * * * * * *http://www.netpublikationer.dk/um/65.../chapter12.htm
* * (b) Formic Acid - HCOOH --- CO2 + H2
* * * * * (i) Liquid Formic Acid * 62 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) 85% Formic Acid in water *53 grams/liter

In today's market-place the highest best use of low-cost solar
hydrogen made from water is to make fresh water from sea water where
needed, make low-cost ammonia fertilizer where needed, convert coal
fired power plants to burning hydrogen in an emission free process,
and take part of the stranded coal, and make synthetic crude oil, and
put the oil companies out of business - all while accumulating lots
and lots of money for the next step;

Then we use as much coal and other hydrocarbons as it takes for making
HTP, because Mook solar energy or that of its green hydrogen are not
allowed to make HTP.

Buying the major aerospace companies around the world, divesting them
of their space faring assets (which are money losers) and selling the
more profitable military and aircraft divisions - keeping the space
faring divisions as a single super space company. *Then, use those
assets to create a fully reusable heavy lift launcher fleet - of five
vehicles

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/E...cribd.com/doc/....

With a five day turn-around the fleet is capable of putting up 695
tons into LEO - each day.

With this capability create an increasingly sophisticated set of space
assets to capture a wide range of markets on Earth, including
communications;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I81ogcX3ONY

Using an array of 800+ satellites to paint millions of contiguous
cells across the entire surface of the Earth. *Each satellite is solar
powered, and has a large phased array antenna system. *It paints
thousands of stationary doppler corrected virtual cells across the
Earth, and each satellite operates as an optical router to six peta-
bit open optical laser links to nearest neighbor satellites. *Each
satellite overlaps its neighbors and hands off cells as they pass over
head providing a seamless broadband capability across the planet.
With this core capability I can provide basic services, telephone,
radio, television, internet; and advanced capabilities - tele-
presence, tele-robotics, etc.

Off-world Energy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWiXDu64c0g

Large concentrators on Earth orbit focus sunlight to 1,600x ambient
intensity - to CPV cells adapted for use in vacuum. *The CPV cells
drive an advanced MEMS based Free Electron Laser (FEL) of very high
efficiency. *The CPV/FEL combination delivers over 50% of its energy
at any desired wavelength to receivers on the ground. *The initial
system is orbited and solar sailing techniques are used to fly the 5
km diameter system from LEO to GEO in a few months. *There it delivers
8,000 beams at 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

A more advanced system consists of two 500 meter components - that
consist of MEMS units only - a generator and a receiver. *The first
test unit flies the generator to L1 between Earth and Sun. *The second
test unit flies the receiver to GEO - where it receives the UV beam
created by the generator, and uses the UV energy to create an IR beam
that produces 220 beams of 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

Once the test is successfully completed another pair is orbited - and
using solar sailing techniques the receiver here flies to GEO while
the generator flies to Jupiter. *In passing Jupiter the receiver uses
gravity boost to drop directly into the Sun - at 3.75 million km light
pressure exceeds gravity pressure (by reorienting the space craft) and
over 220 GW of UV energy is beamed to the receiver at GEO. *This is
reformed by the receiver into 22 million 10 kW beams - targeted to
mobile as well as stationary receivers.

Which revolutionizes transportation systems on Earth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxV2F...utube.com/watc...

Putting the present owners of primary fuels out of business.

Never fear, the carbon compounds combined with ultra-low-cost abundant
energy creates vast nw uses for low these compounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMefZ...tube.com/watch...

While expanding the use of asteroid materials as feedstock for
orbiting factories, farms and forests. *these factories farms and
forests on orbit create all products via tele-operated robots and then
distribute them where needed anywhere in the solar system.

Humanity today uses 28 billion tons of raw materials. *With 8 billion
people consuming at the rate of millionaires today this will rise to
400 billion tons of raw materials. * To maintain this rate of transfer
from the asteroid belt requires 840 trillion watts today rising to 12
quadrillion watts when *8 billion people consume at millionaire
rates. * A generator array 120 km across operating at 3.75 million km
from the Sun is sufficient to produce the power needed continuously
for billions of years. *The richest 1% of the asteroid belt has
sufficient resources to supply humanity for 90,000 years at the higher
rate.

Today humanity 6.8 billion people produce $70 trillion with the
materials and energy it has available to it. *By making use of solar
energy in this way, and making use of asteroid belt in this way, along
with space based factories and communications to implement advanced
tele presence and telerobotics, this could easily rise to $8
quadrillion per year. * This could be done in 25 years - a 20% per
annum compounded rate of growth in per capita income.

While 25% of us make do with less than $1 per day, while 45% of us
make do with less than $2 per day, and 10 million of us make do with
$2,000 per day, and 1,000 of us make do with $2,000,000 per day - we
can expect that with profound fundamental growth in our productive
capabilities by growing

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Jul 12, 4:12*pm, William Mook wrote:
On Jul 10, 7:47*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

Don't tell me, tell it to Bert.

I 100% agree that our sun is way under utilized. *Too bad you have
such limited connections as to taking any actions that would make Big
Energy sweat bullets, whereas instead they seem to be laughing at us,
especially laughing at those of us certified as BP's "small people".

On Jul 10, 11:46*am, William Mook wrote:

There is a safe reliable natural fusion reactor that produces 22
trillion times as much energy as the entire human race uses today. *We
call it THE SUN!

At present photovoltaic systems cost $1,550 per square meter and
produce only 200 watts when the sun shines. *Even in sunny spots they
produce only 60 watts per square meter when averaged over the course
of a year. *This is not competitive.

I assume that's the all-inclusive installed and grid connected cost
per square meter, because commercial grade panels are on the market at
as little as $2.25/watt, and some of those at under $3.00/watt will
have their annual average close to 75 w/m2, and the best ones should
exceed 100 w/m2..

My approach collects and concentrates incident light using ultra-low-
cost lens and mirror technologies to 5,000x ambient intensity found on
Earth. * Terrestrial solar energy can be used to produce hydrogen from
water for less than $608 per metric ton when this is done.

That's because high-temperature electrolysis (HTE) done by MEMS based
CPV cells inside a water-filled cavity shaped to focus and direct the
sunlight costs only $0.10 per square meter and the HTE process itself
produces 700 watts per square meter of sunlight captured in this way
when the sun shines. *This averages 200 watts per square meter when
averaged over the course of a year. *The primary collector costs only
$0.10 per square meter while the MEMS device costs $22,500 per square
meter. *Only 2 sq cm of MEMS device is used per square meter of
primary collector, so only $4.50 is added per square meter of primary
collector.

http://www.youtube.com/user/harrymoo...33/dbWNnVsBhOg

With hydrogen made in this way, hydrogen costing less than any other
primary fuel is now available. *Utility scale energy storage is the
next issue. *This is made possible using any of the following
technologies;

(1) Gaseous hydrogen stored in geological formations (depleted gas and
oil wells) 15 grams/liter - 25 grams/liter
* * (a) Hydrogen mobilizes stationary oil and natural gas reserves
increasing output of 'empty' wells
(2) Liquid hydrogen stored in ultra-insulating cryogenic containers
with cryo-coolers 70 grams/liter
* * *(a) Slush Hydrogen - 86 grams/liter
(3) Conversion and reforming into an intermediate hydrogen rich liquid
* * (a) Ammonia - N2 + 3 H2 --- *2 NH3
* * * * * (i) Liquid Ammonia * 151 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) Ammonia/Water solutions *70 grams/liter - 100 grams/
liter
* * * * * (iii) Ammonia salt solutions *100 grams/liter
* * * * * * * * *http://www.netpublikationer.dk/um/65.../chapter12.htm
* * (b) Formic Acid - HCOOH --- CO2 + H2
* * * * * (i) Liquid Formic Acid * 62 grams/liter
* * * * * (ii) 85% Formic Acid in water *53 grams/liter

In today's market-place the highest best use of low-cost solar
hydrogen made from water is to make fresh water from sea water where
needed, make low-cost ammonia fertilizer where needed, convert coal
fired power plants to burning hydrogen in an emission free process,
and take part of the stranded coal, and make synthetic crude oil, and
put the oil companies out of business - all while accumulating lots
and lots of money for the next step;

Then we use as much coal and other hydrocarbons as it takes for making
HTP, because Mook solar energy or that of its green hydrogen are not
allowed to make HTP.

Buying the major aerospace companies around the world, divesting them
of their space faring assets (which are money losers) and selling the
more profitable military and aircraft divisions - keeping the space
faring divisions as a single super space company. *Then, use those
assets to create a fully reusable heavy lift launcher fleet - of five
vehicles

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/E...cribd.com/doc/....

With a five day turn-around the fleet is capable of putting up 695
tons into LEO - each day.

With this capability create an increasingly sophisticated set of space
assets to capture a wide range of markets on Earth, including
communications;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I81ogcX3ONY

Using an array of 800+ satellites to paint millions of contiguous
cells across the entire surface of the Earth. *Each satellite is solar
powered, and has a large phased array antenna system. *It paints
thousands of stationary doppler corrected virtual cells across the
Earth, and each satellite operates as an optical router to six peta-
bit open optical laser links to nearest neighbor satellites. *Each
satellite overlaps its neighbors and hands off cells as they pass over
head providing a seamless broadband capability across the planet.
With this core capability I can provide basic services, telephone,
radio, television, internet; and advanced capabilities - tele-
presence, tele-robotics, etc.

Off-world Energy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWiXDu64c0g

Large concentrators on Earth orbit focus sunlight to 1,600x ambient
intensity - to CPV cells adapted for use in vacuum. *The CPV cells
drive an advanced MEMS based Free Electron Laser (FEL) of very high
efficiency. *The CPV/FEL combination delivers over 50% of its energy
at any desired wavelength to receivers on the ground. *The initial
system is orbited and solar sailing techniques are used to fly the 5
km diameter system from LEO to GEO in a few months. *There it delivers
8,000 beams at 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

A more advanced system consists of two 500 meter components - that
consist of MEMS units only - a generator and a receiver. *The first
test unit flies the generator to L1 between Earth and Sun. *The second
test unit flies the receiver to GEO - where it receives the UV beam
created by the generator, and uses the UV energy to create an IR beam
that produces 220 beams of 1.25 MW each to receivers on the ground.

Once the test is successfully completed another pair is orbited - and
using solar sailing techniques the receiver here flies to GEO while
the generator flies to Jupiter. *In passing Jupiter the receiver uses
gravity boost to drop directly into the Sun - at 3.75 million km light
pressure exceeds gravity pressure (by reorienting the space craft) and
over 220 GW of UV energy is beamed to the receiver at GEO. *This is
reformed by the receiver into 22 million 10 kW beams - targeted to
mobile as well as stationary receivers.

Which revolutionizes transportation systems on Earth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxV2F...utube.com/watc...

Putting the present owners of primary fuels out of business.

Never fear, the carbon compounds combined with ultra-low-cost abundant
energy creates vast nw uses for low these compounds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMefZ...tube.com/watch...

While expanding the use of asteroid materials as feedstock for
orbiting factories, farms and forests. *these factories farms and
forests on orbit create all products via tele-operated robots and then
distribute them where needed anywhere in the solar system.

Humanity today uses 28 billion tons of raw materials. *With 8 billion
people consuming at the rate of millionaires today this will rise to
400 billion tons of raw materials. * To maintain this rate of transfer
from the asteroid belt requires 840 trillion watts today rising to 12
quadrillion watts when *8 billion people consume at millionaire
rates. * A generator array 120 km across operating at 3.75 million km
from the Sun is sufficient to produce the power needed continuously
for billions of years. *The richest 1% of the asteroid belt has
sufficient resources to supply humanity for 90,000 years at the higher
rate.

Today humanity 6.8 billion people produce $70 trillion with the
materials and energy it has available to it. *By making use of solar
energy in this way, and making use of asteroid belt in this way, along
with space based factories and communications to implement advanced
tele presence and telerobotics, this could easily rise to $8
quadrillion per year. * This could be done in 25 years - a 20% per
annum compounded rate of growth in per capita income.

While 25% of us make do with less than $1 per day, while 45% of us
make do with less than $2 per day, and 10 million of us make do with
$2,000 per day, and 1,000 of us make do with $2,000,000 per day - we
can expect that with profound fundamental growth in our productive
capabilities by growing our fundamental energy and material and
productive capacities - that the poorest of us humans will make do in
25 years with $200 per day while the richest of us will make do with
$200,000,000 per day - keeping nearly the same relative distribution -
all in real 2008 dollars. * Since most work we take for granted today
will be automated, and since $200 per day amounts to $73,000 per year
- and 7.3% interest on accumulated funds is high by today's standards,
$73k per year revenue without having to do substantial work as we know
it, amounts to earning interest on $1 million in assets. * That is,
the poorest of us would be equivalent to millionaires today - and most
would be equivalent to billionaires and more. *The richest of us will
be more powerful and capable than nation-states today. *Nation states
will undergo a revolutionary transformation

...

read more »

The cost per peak watt installed for CdTe panels is $3 per *peak* watt
- this is at present the least expensive way to make conventional
photo-cells

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PVeff(rev100414).png

These range from 3% to 12% efficiency - RCA started doing research
when efficiency was even less than 3%. *The lower cost ones (on a $/
watt basis) are 9% efficient at best. *They're available from First
Solar (not to be confused with 12% efficient CdTe cells not in
production yet.)

So, at 1000 watts PEAK intensity - 9% is 90 watts PEAK. *Since the $3
per peak watt installed uses this same peak we can see that CdTe - the
cost leaders in conventional solar tech - cost $270 per square meter
installed. *This is thin film CdTe - not crystalline Si - which I was
careful to point out.

Now we don't always get peak intensity.

In fact out of the 24 hours in a day the brightest places get no more
than 6 hours on average each day. *Most places get 3 or 4 hours

http://www.solarchristmaslights.org/...2009/07/world_...

So, this cuts the average down from 1000 watts to 250 at the high end
and 120 in most places.

CdTe Panels cost $3 per watt installed and are 9% efficient. *So, the
90 watts peak per square meter drops to an average of 10 watts per
square meter - which increases the the cost per watt to $27 per
average watt for CdTe.

Now, if you'd look at the first graph I gave you you'd see that multi-
junction cells are in excess of 40% efficient. *That's 400 PEAK watts
- and these cost about $5 per square inch - which is $8,000 per square
meter.when used conventionally *- which is $200 per average watt - but
when made part of a CPV system - with ultra-low-cost optics - light is
concentrated 5,000x solar intensity - which drops prices to $0.05 per
peak watt.

So, details count and you've got to make good choices all around to
achieve reasonable price points.

Your solar derived H2 economy seems by far the best game in town, even
if you do tend to exaggerate and/or obfuscate like most of us.

Actually 800 peak solar watts is offering a more realistic influx to
work with, thus 40% of that is worth 320 w/m2(peak within +/- 2 hrs),
and otherwise that $5/sq.in. is also exaggerated towards the high
side, because China or India could mass produce those for us at less
than $1/sq.in., or less than $5/watt installed and grid connected.

Storing these electrons or energy in the form of Mook H2, Mook H2O2 or
whatever Mook synfuel seems like a good idea that should have been
well underway as of a decade ago. Perhaps another decade from now it
will not hardly matter because the few left by then we'll be trying to
either prepare for survive from WW3.

So perhaps there's no real hurry until the last spendy barrel of toxic
oil is put up for auction (minimum bid $1000).

~ BG

On Jul 12, 4:27*pm, William Mook wrote:
Here's a good average insolation map for flat panel receivershttp://www.soda-is.com/img/carte_Ed_13_world.pdf

I think there is good reason to believe that many of us alive today
have the potential to live as long as they like

http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_g...oid_aging.html

As we develop space faring technology we will see a vast reversal of
our present world. *One where people and ideas are in short supply,
while resources and capabilities are in nearly infinite supply - and
the value of every single human being is nearly infinite as a result.

Your immortality intent or dependency is noted. Meanwhile, the rest
of us BP "small people" are going to suffer, grow old and die, as well
as mostly going out cranky and broke because of the existing and
future cost of energy that even the next generations will not likely
see an affordable tonne of Mook H2 or hardly anything else via Mook.

We might as well lay back and depend upon those "seans" to save us,
and otherwise just not bother those Big People (including them
Rothschilds) with our incessant whining about the artificially
inflated cost of most everything, or mention the demise of our global
environment that's getting trashed by Big Energy. Obviously no
matters what happens, your family dynasty or cabal protected lifestyle
is set in stone, and there's nothing at risk unless you decide to take
your own life.

Is there some other hidden motivation(s) or intentions that you
haven't expressed?

~ BG

On Jul 13, 6:36*am, bert wrote:

To Ya All * Confinement by magnetic field such as the Tokamak
works,but it is self destructive. This is what I told Columbia U *I
was right and they wasted time and big bucks. My Pulse Fusion Machine
does away with this heat problem. It has no torus.made of lithium
metal. It needs no 9 transformers *Yes it has a helium exhaust. Yes
the machine is very big and costly * *TreBert

What's the smallest prototype you can deliver, as proof-positive that
the 50/50 public and private investments are going to see as its full-
scale potential?

Can you get any of those research wizards via DoE to help?

Have you sent your proposals to Steven Chu?

Are you deathly afraid of yet another rejection, like William Mook?

~ BG

On Jul 13, 1:59*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
And YES, it will NEVER BE BUILT!

Saul Levy

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:36:08 -0700 (PDT), bert



wrote:
To Ya All * Confinement by magnetic field such as the Tokamak
works,but it is self destructive. This is what I told Columbia U *I
was right and they wasted time and big bucks. My Pulse Fusion Machine
does away with this heat problem. It has no torus.made of lithium
metal. It needs no 9 transformers *Yes it has a helium exhaust. Yes
the machine is very big and costly * *TreBert

The source of the heat is important. Sparking a reaction and getting
the reaction to support itself is the key. This is given by the
Lawson Criterion. No fusion reaction - other than those sparked by
atomic bombs - have attain self sustaining conditions. Most likely in
part due to the classified nature of super dense plasma data due to
its direct application to weapon design - one of the unaccounted for
costs of the Cold War. In the 1950s folks thought it would take only
a few years to create a fusion reactor. This today is thought of as
technological hubris of the age. A more critical analysis shows that
we've paid a heavy commercial price for our classification system and
our approach to nuclear and space technologies.

Using inertial confinement fusion techniques like Z-pinch it is
possible to radically reduce critical mass of fission bombs by
increasing their peak plasma density. Going from 3x normal density to
30x normal density using Z-pinch a HEU or HEP fissile system is
reduced from kilogram to milligram quantities. The important point
here is that a fissile 'spark' even a small one with a few milligrams
of HEP or HEU can set off a fusion element of unlimited size. This
suggests a use for the 200,000 tons of HEP and HEU we have on this
planet. The construction of 10 trillion nuclear triggers to set of
trillions of nuclear pulse units.

An aneutronic fusion fuel - something like Boron

p + 11 B -- 3 (4 He) + 8.7 MeV

or Lithium Deuteride

D + 6 Li -- 2 (4 He) + 22.4 MeV

or Lithium hydrogen

p + 7 Li -- 2 (4 He) + 17.2 MeV

or Nitrogen and Hydrogen

p + 15 N -- 12 C + 3 He + 5.0 MeV

Which is also a source of vaunted Helium-3 (which reacts with
Deuterium Lithium and itself

D + 3 He -- 4 He (3.6 MeV) + p (14.7 MeV)
3 He + 6 Li -- 2 (4 He) +p + 16.9 MeV
3 He + 3 He -- 4 He + 2 p + 12.86 MeV

For our purposes, Nitrogen (from the air) Deuterium (from the ocean)
Lithium and Boron are our best bets, with He3 added as we produce more
of it.

10 trillion blasts lasting 3 seconds each in a MHD generator would
operate 30 trillion seconds - which is 1 million years. Or 1,000
generators lasting 1,000 years - without having to produce one ounce
more of HEP or HEU than we already have.

Li6 is 7.4% of natural Lithium
B11 is 80.1% of natural Boron.

We produce 150,000 MT of Lithium each year, and there is a 15 milion
MT reserve worldwide.

11,322 MT per year of Lithium-6 and 1.1 million tons of reserves

We produce 4.5 million MT of Boron each year and there is a reserve
of 170 million MT worldwide.

This means 3.6 million MT per year of Boron 11 is produced and 137
million MT exist world wide.

22.4 MeV per Li6 atom
8.5 MeV per B11 atom

This means that each gram of Li6 releases 360 GJ (about 60 barrels of
oil equivalent) of energy.
each gram of Boron 11 releases 75 GJ (12 barrels of oil equivalent) of
energy

So there is 1,644 bilion barrel oil equivalent in the form of Boron 11
and 900 billion barrels oil equivlanet in the form of Lithium 6.

There are about 900 billion barrels of oil left in the world today

To produce 20 TW of primary energy from 1,000 reactors - requires a 20
GW reactor - and with a 3 second detonation cycle - that's 60 GJ per
reaction - 1/6th of a gram of Li6 per reaction and 2/3 of a gram of
B11 per reaction.

This would only last less than 100 years using terrestrial sources of
Li and B.

Conventional nuclear power plants are big and costly. That doesn't
mean they're impractical. The figure of merit is cost per kilowatt-
hour. For a machine with nearly zero fuel costs - as a nuclear power
plant - its the maintenance cost, life-span and the capital expense
per watt that is the determining factor in computing the figure of
merit.

The fact is there is no practical fusion machine of any sort that
achieves break-even - other than a nuclear explosion.

There are two near-term solutions to our energy problems - and neither
of them involves controlled thermonuclear fusion. The first is high-
temperature nuclear fission. Raising temperatures reduces capital
cost per watt while improving efficiencies. So, this is a no-
brainer. The relation between temperature and cost allowed experts
like Louis Strauss (former Director of AEC) say in 1956 that by 1970
energy would be too cheap to meter. He was fired and every attempt by
the AEC and later DOE to declassify high-temperature nuclear reactor
technology was stonewalled. Even so, fractions of a penny per
kilowatt-hour are possible using high-temperature nuclear reactors.
The second near term solution to our energy problems is concentrated
photo-voltaics using ultra-low-cost optics as described in my patents
on the subject. Here we reduce the system cost to pennies per square
meter and capital expense to fractions of a penny per kilowatt-hour.

At fractions of a penny per kilowatt-hour the cost of energy is less
than the cost of fuel alone. So, it makes sense to use these sources
with high-temperature electrolysis to produce hydrogen at very low
cost. This hydrogen may be used in the following program to convert
our fossil fuel economy to hydrogen - making money at every step;

(1) displace all stationary fossil fuel use with hydrogen gas
distributed by hydrogen gas pipeline network
(2) convert stranded fossil fuels to liquid transportation fuels
using hydrogen and oxygen gas
(3) develop efficient means to store hydrogen in automobiles ships
and aircraft to displace liquid fossil fuels
(a) high-pressure hydrogen tanks
(b) liquid hydrogen tanks
(c) metal hydrides
(d) ammonia reforming
(e) ammonia salt reforming

This could be started immediately, with a program of CPV arrays made
at low cost, or high-temperature nuclear reactors, or both.

On Jul 13, 8:35*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
"The machine is VERY BIG AND COSTLY" sums it up, GOOFY****HEAD!

Can't you READ?

IDIOT!

Saul Levy

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:33:08 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth



wrote:
On Jul 13, 6:36*am, bert wrote:

To Ya All * Confinement by magnetic field such as the Tokamak
works,but it is self destructive. This is what I told Columbia U *I
was right and they wasted time and big bucks. My Pulse Fusion Machine
does away with this heat problem. It has no torus.made of lithium
metal. It needs no 9 transformers *Yes it has a helium exhaust. Yes
the machine is very big and costly * *TreBert

What's the smallest prototype you can deliver, as proof-positive that
the 50/50 public and private investments are going to see as its full-
scale potential?

Can you get any of those research wizards via DoE to help?

Have you sent your proposals to Steven Chu?

Are you deathly afraid of yet another rejection, like?

~ BG- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My two big secrets is how I do the fusion. #1 is type of photons used.
#2 my way of confinement. I am very clever,and know how every thing
works,and know how to make them work better. I have a theory on all
universe secrets. This is reality,and the reason I should be given a
chance to show what I can do best(THINK THINGS OUT) Trebert

On Jul 14, 3:28*pm, William Mook wrote:
Conventional nuclear power plants are big and costly. *That doesn't
mean they're impractical. *The figure of merit is cost per kilowatt-
hour. *For a machine with nearly zero fuel costs - as a nuclear power
plant - its the maintenance cost, life-span and the capital expense
per watt that is the determining factor in computing the figure of
merit.

The fact is there is no practical fusion machine of any sort that
achieves break-even - other than a nuclear explosion.

There are two near-term solutions to our energy problems - and neither
of them involves controlled thermonuclear fusion. *The first is high-
temperature nuclear fission. *Raising temperatures reduces capital
cost per watt while improving efficiencies. *So, this is a no-
brainer. *The relation between temperature and cost allowed experts
like Louis Strauss (former Director of AEC) say in 1956 that by 1970
energy would be too cheap to meter. *He was fired and every attempt by
the AEC and later DOE to declassify high-temperature nuclear reactor
technology was stonewalled. *Even so, fractions of a penny per
kilowatt-hour are possible using high-temperature nuclear reactors.
The second near term solution to our energy problems is concentrated
photo-voltaics using ultra-low-cost optics as described in my patents
on the subject. *Here we reduce the system cost to pennies per square
meter and capital expense to fractions of a penny per kilowatt-hour.

At fractions of a penny per kilowatt-hour the cost of energy is less
than the cost of fuel alone. *So, it makes sense to use these sources
with high-temperature electrolysis to produce hydrogen at very low
cost. *This hydrogen may be used in the following program to convert
our fossil fuel economy to hydrogen - making money at every step;

*(1) displace all stationary fossil fuel use with hydrogen gas
distributed by hydrogen gas pipeline network
*(2) convert stranded fossil fuels to liquid transportation fuels
using hydrogen and oxygen gas
*(3) develop efficient means to store hydrogen in automobiles ships
and aircraft to displace liquid fossil fuels
* * *(a) high-pressure hydrogen tanks
* * *(b) liquid hydrogen tanks
* * *(c) metal hydrides
* * *(d) ammonia reforming
* * *(e) ammonia salt reforming

This could be started immediately, with a program of CPV arrays made
at low cost, or high-temperature nuclear reactors, or both.

You do realize that devout Zionist/Jews like rabbi Saul Levy have
absolutely no interest in promoting anything that benefits the general
population, or is less impacting our environment. In fact, it's ZNR
Jews exactly like Saul Levy that has kept anything you try from ever
going mainstream.

And don't forget about using failsafe thorium.

Thorium by itself has no CM(critical mass), but none the less makes
for a terrific failsafe breeder reactor once kick-started by a
temporary usage of plutonium or whatever artificial proton beam that
makes for an accelerator-driven system (or ADS) reactor that's
entirely controllable to suit (we’re talking way better off than
burning coal or even consuming natural gas, as well as almost
unlimited energy on demand, as limited by only the grid capacity).

A sub-critical thorium reactor: (skip to page 16)
http://energy2050.se/uploads/files/rubbia2.pdf

We’re talking of relatively dirt cheap, clean and environmentally
friendly energy that can’t possibly add to our current or future
problems, as well can’t become weapons grade or even seriously dirty
enough to matter.

Once having established a spare/surplus terawatt here or there, all
sorts of better and way cheaper alternatives to raw hydrocarbons come
to mind. Obviously those cartels and cabals of Big Energy do not want
to see any of this happen, so it's no wonder that even a small amount
of Mook renewable energy is still going nowhere.

btw; The BOEING hydrogen powered spy-plane/aircraft "Phantom Eye"is
about to further prove exactly what you've been saying all along.
Once again, Mook gets no formal credits.

http://www.industryweek.com/articles...t_222 59.aspx

~ BG