![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dennis Woos" wrote in message ... I think you will need (some or all of which you may already have, or may come with your scope): Thank you very much Dennis for the great advice. Much appreciated. -Bob |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen,
Good comments. I differ though on the toss up between tracking and DSCs (I have neither at the moment), but I'm more into DSOs, where the mag is lowish and the objects often faint and hard to find (I find!). DSCs don't preclude the fun/frustration of star hopping, but would at least be a handy confirmation of where you've landed. For planets and public viewings, EQ... Mark IOW, based on my current exeperiences with Dobs, Forks, Wedges and GEMs, given the choice between a Dob with DSCs and a Dob with EQ platform. I'd definitely go for the one with platform drive. Finding stuff is a pain, but no where near as much a pain as hand tracking easy to find targets above some threshold of magnification (in my case, I get annoyed above 150x). Lastly, with the platform drive, you don't lose your position if you need to spend time studying the charts during a star hop. That makes star hopping less of a pain, thus the DSCs less of an advantage. Stephen Paul |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|