![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Androcles:
On May 11, 7:00*am, "Androcles" wrote: On May 11, 9:21 am, Martin Brown wrote: Robert Clark wrote: On May 11, 3:11 am, Martin Brown wrote: ... I have not seen it fail on modern posts by keyword at all. I blame user error. Regards, Martin Brown Do the search yourself: link broken by Google.Groups I get link broken by Google.Groups and that fails. Looks to me like programmer error, truncation of URL. Google have a bad apple in the barrel that needs firing before he/she does some serious damage. Maybe they don't want to spend any money on a channel that earns them "no" income? So this might be the "last position before the door", or perhaps the "first position to see how you do"? David A. Smith |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Tom Potter:
On May 12, 5:04*pm, "Tom Potter" wrote: .... There was NO problem before Google bought DejaNews. Well, there were few problems, even 1 year ago. At least with search. I hated it when Yahoo trashed AltaVista, too. David A. Smith |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 May 2010 20:04:15 -0400, Tom Potter
wrote: There was NO problem before Google bought DejaNews. DejaNews called up EXACTLY what you expected. The problem is that Google "cooks the books" on searches and feds you what they want you to see, rather than what you want to see. [...] I can't believe that after all these years, I still really miss DejaNews. Google stopped carrying for USENET a long time ago. Now they want you to use their so call stupid Google Groups. :| -- Get a better browser! ![]() http://tiny.cc/bestbrowser |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
d4rkn1ght writes:
On Wed, 12 May 2010 20:04:15 -0400, Tom Potter wrote: There was NO problem before Google bought DejaNews. DejaNews called up EXACTLY what you expected. The problem is that Google "cooks the books" on searches and feds you what they want you to see, rather than what you want to see. [...] I can't believe that after all these years, I still really miss DejaNews. Google stopped carrying for USENET a long time ago. Now they want you to use their so call stupid Google Groups. :| Don't mince words, just come right out and say "google groups sucks". Then, if you want to feel justified in that, search for that phrase, and notice that out of the probably thousands of times that's been uttered, it will only find a few percent of them. Phil -- I find the easiest thing to do is to k/f myself and just troll away -- David Melville on r.a.s.f1 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
O/T: Will Google Groups ever fix its search function? | Robert Clark | Policy | 9 | May 11th 10 02:47 PM |
ATTN: Google Groups now improving! (was: google now useless) | Daniel Joseph Min | Astronomy Misc | 2 | March 22nd 05 02:54 PM |
ATTN: Google Groups now improving! (was: google now useless) | Daniel Joseph Min | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 22nd 05 02:54 PM |
REPOST: ATTN: Google Groups now improving! (was: google now useless) | Saul Levy | Misc | 0 | March 16th 05 09:03 PM |
Google Groups Changes? | Odysseus | Misc | 1 | February 8th 05 02:47 PM |