The moronic trolling bigot Chris L Peterson [email protected]

On Jul 26, 3:48*pm, Jim Newman wrote:
oriel36 wrote:

That was a master-stroke of Wormley to crosspost between SAA and
sci.physics,much like mixing acid with poison along with the old Uncle
Al trick of re-directing posts.

Once again you are mistaken. The cross posting was by the OP, not SW
(who has not yet participated in this thread).

Try this thread I was refering to as an extension of this thread -

'ROTATION MAY SOLVE COSMIC MYSTERY '

Wormley couldn't generate interest in 'dark' this and that or any
other of the empirical junk in saa alone so now he attaches
'sci.physics' when he does it,fine as far as I am concerned,
considering it is all speculative junk which has gone flat very
quickly.

I do not know how you numbskulls manage to ignore the entire history
of clocks,longitude and planetary dynamics in order to arrive at the
wrong value for daily rotation and subsequently the incorrect
information regarding planetary shape and dimensions which are
contained in the correct 24 hour/360 degree value.I am considered mad
for promoting that the Earth turns 15 degrees every hour while
everyone else disagrees and that is the true madness.

I have been correct and especially where astronomy and planetary
dynamics is concerned while none of you have ever been right due to
the ideas of people you follow.

oriel36 wrote:
On Jul 26, 3:48 pm, Jim Newman wrote:
oriel36 wrote:

That was a master-stroke of Wormley to crosspost between SAA and
sci.physics,much like mixing acid with poison along with the old Uncle
Al trick of re-directing posts.
Once again you are mistaken. The cross posting was by the OP, not SW
(who has not yet participated in this thread).

Try this thread I was refering to as an extension of this thread -

'ROTATION MAY SOLVE COSMIC MYSTERY '

So why reply in /this/ thread (which is neither about, nor started by,
nor contributed to by the subject of your response)?

A serious question. Why this thread?