![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 6:14*am, Jack wrote:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090622.html "The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is scheduled to orbit and better map the Moon, search for buried and hidden ice, and return many high resolution images. Some images will be below one meter in resolution and include images of historic Apollo landing sites." Should we start holding our breath? ~ BG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 6:14*am, Jack wrote:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090622.html "The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is scheduled to orbit and better map the Moon, search for buried and hidden ice, and return many high resolution images. Some images will be below one meter in resolution and include images of historic Apollo landing sites." You folks do realize that this deployment of merely .528% payload (including the spent upper stage) took 4.5 days getting into lunar orbit. Does this not ring any bells, as to what it took for getting all of an Apollo mission into lunar orbit within nearly a day shorter? ~ BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 12:10 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 24, 6:14 am, Jack wrote: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090622.html "The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is scheduled to orbit and better map the Moon, search for buried and hidden ice, and return many high resolution images. Some images will be below one meter in resolution and include images of historic Apollo landing sites." You folks do realize that this deployment of merely .528% payload (including the spent upper stage) took 4.5 days getting into lunar orbit. Does this not ring any bells, as to what it took for getting all of an Apollo mission into lunar orbit within nearly a day shorter? ~ BG Hi It means they spent more fuel on humans that have limited time in space compared to an unmanned probe that can take its time and use less fuel. There is nothing here, just economics . Dwight |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
It means they spent more fuel on humans that have limited time in space compared to an unmanned probe that can take its time and use less fuel. There is nothing here, just economics . Dwight Never resort to a simple, logical explanation when an involved conspiracy can be substituted. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 2:47*pm, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote: Hi It means they spent more fuel on humans that have limited time in space compared to an unmanned probe that can take its time and use less fuel. There is nothing here, just economics . Dwight Never resort to a simple, logical explanation when an involved conspiracy can be substituted. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California Never put your brown nose in another butt-crack, because you never know what else has been in that butt-crack. ~ BG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 6:59*am, BradGuth wrote:
Never put your brown nose in another butt-crack, because you never know what else has been in that butt-crack. *~ BG Sound advice, from our gardening expert, there. Planted deep in fresh horse compost. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 2:34*pm, " wrote:
On Jun 25, 12:10 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Jun 24, 6:14 am, Jack wrote: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap090622.html "The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is scheduled to orbit and better map the Moon, search for buried and hidden ice, and return many high resolution images. Some images will be below one meter in resolution and include images of historic Apollo landing sites." You folks do realize that this deployment of merely .528% payload (including the spent upper stage) took 4.5 days getting into lunar orbit. *Does this not ring any bells, as to what it took for getting all of an Apollo mission into lunar orbit within nearly a day shorter? *~ BG Hi *It means they spent more fuel on humans that have limited time in space compared to an unmanned probe that can take its time and use less fuel. There is nothing here, just economics . Dwight But LOR used 4 times as much fuel/kg, and it still took more than a day longer to get there. ~ BG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 6:56*am, BradGuth wrote:
But LOR used 4 times as much fuel/kg, and it still took more than a day longer to get there. *~ BG I didn't know they went to the Moon in Lord of the Rings... ? Was that in the director's cut? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
moon landings | Leff T Wright | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | July 12th 08 09:55 PM |
Slightly OT Moon landings. | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 12 | July 28th 06 01:03 PM |
Moon landings | [email protected] | Science | 9 | September 12th 05 10:44 PM |
moon landings were a hoax | [email protected] | Policy | 8 | July 28th 05 10:06 PM |
Moon Landings - Did NASA lie ? | lheureuxph | Misc | 46 | August 25th 04 06:47 PM |