![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, there's always the Russian approach to dealing with spammers:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.08/spamking.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Well, there's always the Russian approach to dealing with spammers: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.08/spamking.html All glory to the three hero-sluts! Pat |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keelhauling, flogging, and hanging from the yardarm are much more
appropriate for this spammer. "Pat Flannery" wrote in message dakotatelephone... Jorge R. Frank wrote: (found this message after wading through 37 new messages, all but ten of them spam with different sender addresses to foil filters...) Yeah. Heckuva job there, Alan. I tried to use my Thunderbird filter system to delete anything with a "@" in the sender name, but unfortunately, it checks not only the sender name itself, but the address it came from, so deletes everything. I say we track the ****er who's doing this down and cut his hands off after blinding him. But that's just one patriot's opinion. ;-) Pat |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reply to BB | Knecht | Research | 1 | December 1st 08 06:35 PM |
This is NOT a reply, Tom. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | February 6th 06 08:39 AM |
This is NOT a reply, Tom. | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 6th 06 08:39 AM |
a reply | rebel | Misc | 2 | September 8th 05 02:56 PM |