![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When was the first patent issued for a spaceship? And what was it and
who was it issued to? By spaceship I mean a manned vehicle for traveling beyond the Earth's atmosphere, either as an orbiter or as a means for traveling to another planet. I would even include suborbital vehicles since things like the Sanger antipodal bomber were meant to operate above the atmosphere. RM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 5:35 pm, Ron Miller wrote:
When was the first patent issued for a spaceship? And what was it and who was it issued to? This an ongoing search for me. There are patents for "rocket" devices that are mostly fireworks, going back to the early 19th century. Manned stuff doesn't seem to appear untill the 30s. My guess is that the idea was subconsciously deemed impossible until after the Army balloon flights to 60,000 feet and the success of the large rockets (either solid or liquid). You might have a look at 1840541 and 1879187. By spaceship I mean a manned vehicle for traveling beyond the Earth's atmosphere, either as an orbiter or as a means for traveling to another planet. I would even include suborbital vehicles since things like the Sanger antipodal bomber were meant to operate above the atmosphere. In the 30s, the popular mind called "space" anything above about 55,000 feet. Defintion must be nailed down, first, of course. Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 20, 10:38*am, "
wrote: On Apr 19, 5:35 pm, Ron Miller wrote: When was the first patent issued for a spaceship? And what was it and who was it issued to? This an ongoing search for me. * There are patents for "rocket" devices that are mostly fireworks, going back to the early 19th century. *Manned stuff *doesn't seem to appear untill the 30s. * *My guess is that the idea was subconsciously deemed impossible until after the Army balloon flights to 60,000 feet and the success of the large rockets (either solid or liquid). *You might have a look at 1840541 and 1879187. By spaceship I mean a manned vehicle for traveling beyond the Earth's atmosphere, either as an orbiter or as a means for traveling to another planet. I would even include suborbital vehicles since things like the Sanger antipodal bomber were meant to operate above the atmosphere. In the 30s, the popular mind called "space" anything above about 55,000 feet. * Defintion must be nailed down, first, of course. Mike Thanks for the patent numbers. I've always included stratosphere balloons in the history of spacecraft! Ron |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Miller wrote: Thanks for the patent numbers. I've always included stratosphere balloons in the history of spacecraft! Yeah, but although Project Man High made some hay out of the concept, a balloon by its very nature can't float up into space, as it needs a atmosphere to operate in, tenuous as that atmosphere might be. Pat |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OM wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:12:00 -0700 (PDT), Ron Miller wrote: Thanks for the patent numbers. I've always included stratosphere balloons in the history of spacecraft! ...You'd be surprised at the number of people who don't. Why would include them in the first place? D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 22, 4:29*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
Ron Miller wrote: Thanks for the patent numbers. I've always included stratosphere balloons in the history of spacecraft! Yeah, but although Project Man High made some hay out of the concept, a balloon by its very nature can't float up into space, as it needs a atmosphere to operate in, tenuous as that atmosphere might be. Pat That's true, of course, but the design of stratosphere balloon gondolas and capsules laid a good deal of important groundwork for spacecraft life support design. R |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 22, 5:49*pm, (Derek Lyons) wrote:
OM wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:12:00 -0700 (PDT), Ron Miller wrote: Thanks for the patent numbers. I've always included stratosphere balloons in the history of spacecraft! ...You'd be surprised at the number of people who don't. Why would include them in the first place? D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL One reason is that at the extreme altitudes reached by manned stratosphere balloons the technology developed for life support systems laid the groundwork for those in manned spacecraft. R |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 5:35 pm, Ron Miller wrote:
When was the first patent issued for a spaceship? And what was it and who was it issued to? By spaceship I mean a manned vehicle for traveling beyond the Earth's atmosphere, either as an orbiter or as a means for traveling to another planet. I would even include suborbital vehicles since things like the Sanger antipodal bomber were meant to operate above the atmosphere. That restriction does limit things a bit, but you might check patent 508, 753, issued to Edwin Pynchon, on 24 November 1893. It's a rocket- powered "airship." Airship in this case does indeed include a LTAesque "buoyancy compartment" which is only one aspect of the overall ship. Propulsion is air-indepedent, as best I can tell. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bigelow patent | Allen Thomson | Policy | 36 | August 27th 06 06:48 AM |
The Chemtrail Patent | ߃-- ¹¹ | Astronomy Misc | 6 | February 21st 05 11:04 PM |
Wooo! Patent | Scott Lowther | Policy | 4 | December 2nd 03 07:39 AM |
Woo hoo! New patent ... | Scott Lowther | Space Shuttle | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:09 PM |
Woo hoo! New patent ... | Scott Lowther | Policy | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:09 PM |