![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
And of course NASA needs to design and build a spacecraft that can safely transport people to altitudes beyond +300 miles above sealevel for long periods of time. Ever since the time when hand-held electronic calculators were still on the drawing boards--yes, actual boards with mechanical pencils, templates and compasses drawing lines and curves on good old-fashioned vellum (over one-third of a century ago)-- JPL/NASA has failed to send even ONE living person beyond low-earth orbit at a mere 250-300 miles a.s.l. Now if NASA can solve that "little glitch"; maybe, just maybe, they've got a shot at sending REAL astronauts to the Moon. By the time that NASA (or their descendants?) manage that, Mars could be next on the horizon. Until then however, it is a pipe dream...crunch THOSE numbers on your sliderule! Daniel Joseph Min *All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-Frog.org *Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBQAGeV5ljD7YrHM/nEQLOKACePQDfcYFoHt8Ohy0JYmBKP73wf1EAmwdc vv3sKxl6MK2bttv04aO5jzgB =BwWe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- "Richard Schumacher" wrote: Certainly! Can NASA do it? No way in hell, not without drastic top-to-bottom organizational reform. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear LEM:
"LEM" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- And of course NASA needs to design and build a spacecraft that can safely transport people to altitudes beyond +300 miles above sealevel for long periods of time. Ever since the time when hand-held electronic calculators were still on the drawing boards--yes, actual boards with mechanical pencils, templates and compasses drawing lines and curves on good old-fashioned vellum (over one-third of a century ago)-- JPL/NASA has failed to send even ONE living person You've changed your tune. You originally allowed that they might have orbited the Moon. Your condition is worsening. David A. Smith |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- See: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org only by using PGP to clearsign every one of my posts was I able to emphatically identify and authenticate my autograph manuscripts--and thwart any attempts at counterfeiting or forging my signature. That's why I recommend always using PGP, just like every remailer operator says you should always use PGP to sign your posts, thereby assuring your readers that it's yours and not some bogus forgery. Since trolls misquote or fabricate "quotes" and wrongly attribute them to any- one whose character they're trying to assassinate it behooves the serious author to PGP-sign all articles. Otherwise, anyone can "quote" you without verifiable sources. PGP protects your reputation against attack and readily exposes unscrupulous attackers as trolls. Thus every one of my posts is always PGP-clearsigned, that way I retain credit for everything I've written, and I cannot be credited for anything I didn't write. "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote: You've changed your tune. You originally allowed that they might have orbited the Moon. Your condition is worsening. But of course you failed to cite the "originally" part. Unless you can cite my PGP-clearsigned message ID that shows "good" using my PGP public key, you're a failure. Very Truly Yours, Daniel Joseph Min *Min's Official PGP Public Key on the MIT server: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-Frog.org *Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBQAGus5ljD7YrHM/nEQKJAACgjdP7izj+WozkI9uRGVQN93o0t/sAoOj7 IeUk32MYF5XuEZQg+05Eae79 =Gvd5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear LEM:
"LEM" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote: You've changed your tune. You originally allowed that they might have orbited the Moon. Your condition is worsening. But of course you failed to cite the "originally" part. Unless you can cite my PGP-clearsigned message ID that shows "good" using my PGP public key, you're a failure. Your PGP doesn't show "good" now. So your condition *is* worsening. The end of Min is near. Hallelujah! David A. Smith |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear George Orwell:
"George Orwell" wrote in message ... mins pgp sig checks out . *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Daniel Joseph Min *** Signed: 1/11/2004 1:14:43 PM *** Verified: 1/10/2004 11:23:08 PM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** your complete idiot . Thanks, Min. But I don't need a complete idiot. Putting up with you here is enough exposure to idiocy. Wrong. A manned or unmanned capsule orbiting the Moon and returning to Earth is not the same acomplishment as a manned landing and safe return to Earth. You did not deny the possibility of a manned orbit of the Moon as recently as 2003-09-05 URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...shaw.ca&rnum=2 Signatu iQA/AwUBPZHU12fCUS6ovy0cEQJuLQCg/ZYTCwP6Gw8p9Iq6kY7uHArRF6AAn3LkK5AXSPby8VX Flf3hSlIVTs8X=aV9/ David A. Smith |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear George Orwell:
"George Orwell" wrote in message ... no min sig here . whos " nathan jone s " ? It was signed by Daniel Joseph Min, with whatever alias he used at the time. Like George Orwell now. David A. Smith |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear LEM:
"LEM" wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, George Orwell wrote: no min sig here . whos " nathan jone s " ? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I did a search on Google for "Nathan Jones" and found Yourself looking back at you. Every article I've posted is clearsigned using my own private PGP key which always shows a "good" signature status when another checks it via my above-quoted key. It's the ONLY key I ever use! Anyone who claims to be me without my good PGP signature is obviously a fraud. No. Just you and one of your split personalities. But I don't see any posts where this Nathan Jones has ever claimed to be me. Rather, he seems to sign every- thing "Nathan Jones" and his PGP key seems to be good. Yes, you';ve been very consistent, as any good spam-address collector should be. I guess it's the fact that he writes about the apollo missions and he signed his posts with PGP, that makes blithering rocket scientists like this "dlzc" buffoon imagine that I am the only one on usenet who uses PGP. I'd say this "dlzc" was never breast-fed as an infant. Enjoy! Oh, you are saying you are a boob! How nice. David A. Smith |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Your credibility-quotient returns "divide by zero" error. Your slrn scoring entry equals * drop from:...|*dlzc*|... *plonk* "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" trolled: snipped trollbait "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem" --William of Ockham (~1300-1349) That about wraps it up for your "men to moon" fish story. Daniel Joseph Min *Min's Official PGP Public Key on the MIT server: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *All Apollo Moon Missions Were Unmanned: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Min's $10,000 Reward For Astronomers: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org *Min's Interlinear Translation of the Apocalypse: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-Frog.org *Min's Newsgroup-Archived Home Page On The World Wide Web: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...amesh-frog.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBQALTG5ljD7YrHM/nEQIIWQCfUYcb9EfG/0PHuGhVDoMGTT9ix6kAniGU Qd9H3vndaAjHG11qNeUK8XiN =V16J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear LEM:
"LEM" wrote in message ... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Your credibility-quotient returns "divide by zero" error. Your slrn scoring entry equals * drop from:...|*dlzc*|... *plonk* Thanks for the virus packge, worm bait. David A. Smith |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "LEM" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... So sure if you want to believe that men walked ONE THOUSAND TIMES further out in space than any manned NASA spacecrafts have been able to navigate since Led Zeppelin was recording their third album, you go ahead and keep believing it...and feel free to believe in the tooth fairy! I prefer the facts of the matter. If a man claims to go to the Moon in a space- craft, then that man needs to prove--beyond any shadow of a doubt--that he in-deed and in-fact did accomplish what he's merely claimed to have done if he expects reasonable people to believe that he's actually done it. Doctored up pictures from under top-top-secret domes at Area51 don't cut it. The "proof" that man walked on the Moon is not just flimsy it's unable to hold water much less to convince a reasonable man. But you can keep believing in the tooth fairy if you prefer. You didn't answer my question. Are you afraid of being proven wrong? Volker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
The New NASA Mission Has Been Grossly Mischaracterized. | Dan Hanson | Policy | 25 | January 26th 04 07:42 PM |
NEWS: The allure of an outpost on the Moon | Kent Betts | Space Shuttle | 2 | January 15th 04 12:56 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 7th 03 08:53 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ v4 | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 4th 03 11:52 PM |