![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double A Fabric of space is very strong,but gravity is stronger
TreBert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff What is an infinite vacuum?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You asked me: “ What is an infinite vacuum ? ”.
An “ infinitely Powerful vacuum ” takes infinite energy to create; and only a virtual ( unreal ) event horizon has infinite energy. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ... Double A Fabric of space is very strong,but gravity is stronger TreBert TB, you're not seriously meaning that you think there are such things as "singularities", are you? I mean, how can "infinite mass" fit into "zero volume"? Okay, i get that neutron stars are compressed matter, so compressed that the atoms have sort of been "squished" and the matter of the star is mostly just neutrons. And i get that neutrons pack a whole lot of mass into a very small volume. And i also get that a black hole compresses even more mass than a neutron star into an even smaller volume. But i don't get an infinite mass compressed into a zero volume (singularity). For me, it's one of the things that ruins the BB theories. I have toyed with the idea of a photon being an infinite mass compressed into a zero volume, which would be why we can only sense it as an itty bitty quantum, a particle-like wave that usually moves real fast. But no, it's just too much of a stretch for me. My idea of mass is that it must always, by nature, take up some volume. It always has a limited (never infinite) nature. And while i can visualize a "zero volume", i find it very hard picturing it being filled with anything. Just don't make sense to me. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S. "The belief that there is only one truth, and that oneself is in possession of it, is the root of all evil in the world." Max Born, quantum physicist, and Olivia Newton John's grandfather! P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com http://painellsworth.net |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 19, 12:06 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Only infinite density could produce an infinitely powerful vacuum, neither could exist, neither could be measured. Would vacuum be measured in units of suck? Double-A |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 19, 7:13*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double A *Fabric of space is very strong,but gravity is stronger TreBert When gravity comes up against the quantum forces at the Planck scale, the quantum forces are stronger. Double-A |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 19, 9:49*am, "Painius" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote... in ... Double A *Fabric of space is very strong,but gravity is stronger TreBert TB, you're not seriously meaning that you think there are such things as "singularities", are you? *I mean, how can "infinite mass" fit into "zero volume"? Bert likes to dream about such things. Okay, i get that neutron stars are compressed matter, so compressed that the atoms have sort of been "squished" and the matter of the star is mostly just neutrons. *And i get that neutrons pack a whole lot of mass into a very small volume. *And i also get that a black hole compresses even more mass than a neutron star into an even smaller volume. But i don't get an infinite mass compressed into a zero volume (singularity). For me, it's one of the things that ruins the BB theories. I have toyed with the idea of a photon being an infinite mass compressed into a zero volume, which would be why we can only sense it as an itty bitty quantum, a particle-like wave that usually moves real fast. *But no, it's just too much of a stretch for me. My idea of mass is that it must always, by nature, take up some volume. It always has a limited (never infinite) nature. *And while i can visualize a "zero volume", i find it very hard picturing it being filled with anything. *Just don't make sense to me. happy days and... * *starry starry nights! Right! Double-A |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 14, 1:08*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"socratus" wrote in message ... ========== 1. A black hole is a theoretical region of space in which the gravitational field *is so powerful that nothing can escape. I was doing a really Big Bang on a Black Hole some time ago ... unfortunately, her husband came home prematurely and I had to scoot through the bathroom window ... big mofo he was, to boot .... No singularity. Mitch Raemsch |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 19, 7:15 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Jeff What is an infinite vacuum? Good grief. Try zero atoms/km3 Can a photon pass or migrate through an absolute vacuum of zero atoms/ km3? ~ BG |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 19, 7:13 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double A Fabric of space is very strong,but gravity is stronger TreBert The force of electrostatic attraction is even stronger than gravity. Try to imagine how many teraVolts our Selene/moon is charged up with. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BIG BANG, BLACK HOLE, EINSTEIN 1911 EQUATION | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 2nd 08 02:49 PM |
French Build Doomsday Machine (Black Hole Generator) Old DyingPhysicists Want to go Out With a Bang | Double-A[_2_] | Misc | 0 | May 1st 08 10:10 PM |
Was the Big Bang an exploding Black Hole? | Val | Science | 0 | May 22nd 04 06:44 PM |
Black Hole exploding is a Big Bang? | Vincent Cate | Research | 3 | April 12th 04 09:36 AM |