Copernicus crater

"Pete Lawrence" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:35:33 -0400, "Albert Maxwell"
wrote:

Nice image for sure, but.......

Seeing is still the #1 factor to getting good images...

Not too sure what the "but" is for? I never said that seeing wasn't
the most important factor.

No offense was intended. I decided to include the additional discussion so
that others, hoping for the same result, are not accidentally mislead by
false interpretation of your results. You obviously had good seeing and I'm
glad you shared that fact. It's a great image, no doubt about it.

Al


"Pete Lawrence" wrote in message
. ..
Here's a shot of Copernicus, taken under good seeing conditions...

http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/lunar/c...-04_Red_cn.jpg
--
Pete Lawrence
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk


--
Pete Lawrence
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:33:31 -0400, "Albert Maxwell"
wrote:


"Pete Lawrence" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:35:33 -0400, "Albert Maxwell"
wrote:

Nice image for sure, but.......

Seeing is still the #1 factor to getting good images...

Not too sure what the "but" is for? I never said that seeing wasn't
the most important factor.

No offense was intended. I decided to include the additional discussion so
that others, hoping for the same result, are not accidentally mislead by
false interpretation of your results. You obviously had good seeing and I'm
glad you shared that fact. It's a great image, no doubt about it.

No offence taken. As you say, seeing is everything indeed.
--
Pete Lawrence
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk

Pete Lawrence wrote:
Here's a shot of Copernicus, taken under good seeing conditions...

http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/lunar/c...-04_Red_cn.jpg

Nice

What sort of resolution do you think that is giving?

--
Abo