![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cosmological problem
Some big telescopes (and some bigger to come) claim to see so far back in time that they are actually witnissing events shortly after the big bang. Hypothetically one could thus see the big bang itself. Now imagine one telescope looking north and seeing this far back. Imagine a second one looking south in the same time: he also looks this far back. The events both see are one and the same, but are seen at locations as far apart as possible. Doesn't sound logical to me. I read this article : "Space seen as finite, shaped like a soccerball" ( http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...er_031008.html ), that provides a possible solution. But how does traditional cosmology explain this? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New on EA - The Podsadka Problem | Encyclopedia Astronautica | Policy | 1 | May 9th 04 11:24 PM |
"Houston, we've got a problem" | jjustwwondering | Policy | 0 | March 7th 04 08:38 AM |
Spirit has a mind of its own? | Jon Berndt | Space Shuttle | 33 | January 28th 04 04:48 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe | rev dan izzo | History | 8 | October 9th 03 05:41 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory on the Formation of the Universe | rev dan izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 29th 03 06:28 PM |