COSMOLOGY CRISIS AND REDSHIFT

On Aug 27, 4:37 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Cosmology is in deep crisis (some say it is dead) so it is time for
cosmologists to try various salvation approaches, including the
following one. All interpretations of the redshift are based on the
assumption that in the formula:

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

the frequency and the wavelength vary while the speed of light is
constant because the hymn "Divine Einstein" is perfect and "we all
believe in relativity, relativity, relativity" etc. However Divine
Albert allegedly thought in terms of hypotheses and there is no reason
why cosmologists should not do so from time to time. That is, those of
them who know well the established interpretations of, say,
accelerating expansion observations, suddenly change direction and
reinterpret everything based on the assumtion that frequency and speed
of light vary while the wavelength is constant. No need to stop
singing "Divine Einstein" and "Yes we all believe in relativity,
relativity, relativity" - after all, Divine Albert himself, in one of
his metamorphoses, pleeded for variable speed of light:

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"So, faced with this evidence most readers must be wondering why we
learn about the importance of the constancy of speed of light. Did
Einstein miss this? Sometimes I find out that what's written in our
textbooks is just a biased version taken from the original work, so
after searching within the original text of the theory of GR by
Einstein, I found this quote:"In the second place our result shows
that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of
the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any
unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place
when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we
might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of
relativity and with it the whole theory of
relativity would be laid in the dust. But in reality this is not the
case. We can only conclude that the special theory of relativity
cannot claim an unlimited domain of validity ; its results hold only
so long as we are able to disregard the influences of gravitational
fields on the phenomena (e.g. of light)." - Albert Einstein
(1879-1955) - The General Theory of Relativity: Chapter 22 - A Few
Inferences from the General Principle of Relativity-. Today we find
that since the Special Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part
of the so called mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to
even suggest that the speed of light be anything other than a
constant. This is somewhat surprising since even Einstein himself
suggested in a paper "On the Influence of Gravitation on the
Propagation of Light," Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of
light might vary with the gravitational potential. Indeed, the
variation of the speed of light in a vacuum or space is explicitly
shown in Einstein's calculation for the angle at which light should
bend upon the influence of gravity. One can find his calculation in
his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2) where V is the gravitational
potential relative to the point where the measurement is taken. 1+V/
c^2 is also known as the gravitational redshift factor."

Pentcho Valev


You are only going to **** off the Zionist/Nazi mainstream status quo.

btw, a good radar magnatron also bends and/or focuses photons.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

~ BG

..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA...

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...

Pentcho Valev wrote:
Cosmology is in deep crisis....
.... try various salvation approaches, including the
[re]-interpretations of the red****
Albert himself, in one of his metamorphoses,
pleeded for variable speed of light:

"BradGuth" wrote:
You are only going to **** off the
Zionist/Nazi mainstream status quo.

hanson wrote:
..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... right!...
But it's great fun to toy with the kikes. They are so
easily crankable and nervous. I just love'm. They
always remind me of the Bumper sticker slogan:
** Hire the handicapped. They are fun to watch **
like this one here, Barak Turdie, the kike, yesterday,
who wants to suppress free speech if you re-post
stuff that some Jew has said. See here why:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6d51437e?hl=en

Brad Guth said to PV & wrote:
btw, a good radar magnatron also bends
and/or focuses photons.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

hanson wrote:
Reminds me of the inventor Lillewang who came by
and tried to sell me his patent of gas-phase semi-
conductors by demonstrating how one can suck the
light out of a fluorescent Light-Tube with a strong
magnet. -- [from one of my earlier post]:
..... Bigboobed Esmeralda and the supervisors
of the electronics division came back up to the
Penthouse offices, where we negotiated with
Lillewang, schlepping a 75 lb Magnet from the NMR
lab and a couple of ladders. The show of the great
magnetic light suck began... Folks began sneaking
out of the room holding back their grins... since
the ****ing light beam just wouldn't leave the tube.
I must have had a smirk on my face too.........and
the inventor got really mad and accused me that
we had rigged the test and that we would now steal
his invention and make billions...."I will sue you
*******s" he screamed, running out of the room......

Physics & kikes so much fun... ahahahahahanson

On Aug 31, 11:30 am, "hanson" wrote:
.... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA...

"BradGuth" wrote in message

...

Pentcho Valev wrote:

Cosmology is in deep crisis....
... try various salvation approaches, including the
[re]-interpretations of the red****
Albert himself, in one of his metamorphoses,
pleeded for variable speed of light:

"BradGuth" wrote:

You are only going to **** off the
Zionist/Nazi mainstream status quo.

hanson wrote:

.... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... right!...
But it's great fun to toy with the kikes. They are so
easily crankable and nervous. I just love'm. They
always remind me of the Bumper sticker slogan:
** Hire the handicapped. They are fun to watch **
like this one here, Barak Turdie, the kike, yesterday,
who wants to suppress free speech if you re-post
stuff that some Jew has said. See here why:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6d51437e?hl=en

Brad Guth said to PV & wrote:
btw, a good radar magnatron also bends
and/or focuses photons.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

hanson wrote:

Reminds me of the inventor Lillewang who came by
and tried to sell me his patent of gas-phase semi-
conductors by demonstrating how one can suck the
light out of a fluorescent Light-Tube with a strong
magnet. -- [from one of my earlier post]:
.... Bigboobed Esmeralda and the supervisors
of the electronics division came back up to the
Penthouse offices, where we negotiated with
Lillewang, schlepping a 75 lb Magnet from the NMR
lab and a couple of ladders. The show of the great
magnetic light suck began... Folks began sneaking
out of the room holding back their grins... since
the ****ing light beam just wouldn't leave the tube.
I must have had a smirk on my face too.........and
the inventor got really mad and accused me that
we had rigged the test and that we would now steal
his invention and make billions...."I will sue you
*******s" he screamed, running out of the room......

Physics & kikes so much fun... ahahahahahanson

X-Band, S-Band, K-Band and whatever radar waves are still merely
photons, and as such they can be focused, reflected and even if need
be bent a little if not by quite a bit via a strong magnetic field.

Effect of the Magnetic Field / http://www.upv.es/gcm/docente/magnetron.html
In Figure 3-B two permanent magnets are added above and below the
tube structure. In Figure 3-C, assume the upper magnet is a north pole
and you are viewing from that position. The lower, south pole magnet,
is located underneath the page, so that the magnetic field appears to
be coming right through the page. Just as electrons flowing through a
conductor cause a magnetic field to build up around that conductor, so
an electron moving through space tends to build up a magnetic field
around itself. On one side (left) of the electron's path, this self
induced magnetic field adds to the permanent magnetic field
surrounding it. On the other side (right) of its path, it has the
opposite effect of subtracting from the permanent magnetic field. The
magnetic field on the right side is therefore weakened, and the
electron's trajectory bends in that direction, resulting in a circular
motion of travel to the anode.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

Einsteinians, do you see any relation between the following two texts:

http://www.answers.com/topic/gravitational-redshift
"Sci-Tech Dictionary: GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT (relativity) A
displacement of spectral lines toward the red when the gravitational
potential at the observer of the light is greater than at its source."

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"So, faced with this evidence most readers must be wondering why we
learn about the importance of the constancy of speed of light. Did
Einstein miss this? Sometimes I find out that what's written in our
textbooks is just a biased version taken from the original work, so
after searching within the original text of the theory of GR by
Einstein, I found this quote: "In the second place our result shows
that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of
the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any
unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place
when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we
might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of
relativity and with it the whole theory of relativity would be laid in
the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude
that the special theory of relativity cannot claim an unlimited domain
of validity ; its results hold only so long as we are able to
disregard the influences of gravitational fields on the phenomena
(e.g. of light)." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) - The General Theory
of Relativity: Chapter 22 - A Few Inferences from the General
Principle of Relativity-. Today we find that since the Special Theory
of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called mainstream
science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that the speed
of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT factor."

Pentcho Valev

On Sep 4, 9:09*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Einsteinians, do you see any relation between the following two texts:

http://www.answers.com/topic/gravitational-redshift
"Sci-Tech Dictionary: GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT (relativity) A
displacement of spectral lines toward the red when the gravitational
potential at the observer of the light is greater than at its source."

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp
"So, faced with this evidence most readers must be wondering why we
learn about the importance of the constancy of speed of light. Did
Einstein miss this? Sometimes I find out that what's written in our
textbooks is just a biased version taken from the original work, so
after searching within the original text of the theory of GR by
Einstein, I found this quote: "In the second place our result shows
that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the
constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of
the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity
and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any
unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place
when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we
might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of
relativity and with it the whole theory of relativity would be laid in
the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude
that the special theory of relativity cannot claim an unlimited domain
of validity ; its results hold only so long as we are able to
disregard the influences of gravitational fields on the phenomena
(e.g. of light)." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) - The General Theory
of Relativity: Chapter 22 - A Few Inferences from the General
Principle of Relativity-. Today we find that since the Special Theory
of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called mainstream
science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that the speed
of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT factor."

Tom Roberts: the most dishonest Einsteinian:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...c57b72201d6522

Pentcho Valev