A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Could we just circulate the air in scramjet propulsion?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 8th 08, 07:04 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.space.policy,sci.engr.mech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 558
Default Could we just circulate the air in scramjet propulsion?

On Mar 8, 1:49 pm, Robert Clark wrote:

Are you saying it is impossible to have a high velocity air stream go
around and around many times in a torus shaped chamber?


yes. if it only has an inlet and outlet.

Molecularly smooth surfaces have been a well-known phenomenon in
materials science for several years now:



So what. They aren't commercially viable. Especially for large
surfaces and consumer use.
  #12  
Old March 8th 08, 07:24 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.space.policy,sci.engr.mech
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_162_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Could we just circulate the air in scramjet propulsion?

Dear Robert Clark:

"Robert Clark" wrote in message
...
....
Are you saying it is impossible to have a high
velocity air stream go around and around many
times in a torus shaped chamber?


No, what he is saying is that it is impossible to do that *and*
get any net thrust out of it.

David A. Smith


  #13  
Old March 8th 08, 09:14 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.space.policy,sci.engr.mech
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,736
Default Could we just circulate the air in scramjet propulsion?

Robert Clark wrote:
:
: The air being circulated around and around means it would go around
:many times in one second. It would not have to go around a
:circumference of 1467 feet. The circumference hence the diameter could
:be much smaller than this.
:

So you are changing the direction of that air mass many, many times in
one second.

:
: The frictional slowing for high Mach speeds would only be a small
roportion of the entering speeds and would mostly be for the boundary
:layer against the sides. This frictional heating could also be reduced
:by using molecularly smooth surfaces and/or by injecting low viscosity
:gas along the sides at a matching speed to the entering air speed.
:

Why not just build a magic perpetual motion machine and use it to spin
a propellor?

--
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable
man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore,
all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
--George Bernard Shaw
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oz continues scramjet tests pete Policy 0 March 28th 06 07:58 AM
NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph Jonathan Silverlight Astronomy Misc 0 November 24th 04 08:21 PM
[Fwd: NASA 'Scramjet' Soars at Almost 7,000 Mph] nightbat Misc 1 November 18th 04 10:29 AM
Secrecy surrounding X-43 scramjet Uddo Graaf Policy 14 April 3rd 04 10:27 PM
Scramjet fuel injection Asherian Technology 0 January 29th 04 06:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.