Why does Sea Launch use non-zero inclination orbits?

OM wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:15:48 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Why do people need to be spoonfed?

...Personally, I've gotten sick of your self-centered, condescending,
egotistical attitude.

That has to be the ultimate in hypocrisy.

You popped on here claiming to be some sort of
NASA engineer, and yet you've refused to give any proof to back your
credentials.

I already vetted him. I even posted a link to a picture of him at work.
He's a real soldier. One with a serious chip on his shoulder, but a
soldier nevertheless.

Enough is enough.

Indeed, you outdid even me. And that's something.

wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 1:06 pm, OM wrote:

You just showed what kind of person you are with that post. You have
joined the ranks with KT and Guth using that vulgarity. There is no
turning back. I won't stoop to your level. Not you mention, you
never were near mine

And which a "lot" of us. You speak for everyone?

Also "Most of us even got tired of it from Dwayne Day, ". That just
shows that your opinion means nothing and you have no creditability

Hmmmph, I never post here....but this subject and you specifically has
gotten me to do so.

I will grant that some of the posters, such as Guth and KT are utterly
annoying, but you sir with your attitude and the whole 'don't question me
because I know more than you, scum' gets pretty old. I bet you've got a lot
to contribute but right now it is getting to the point that I'll start
skipping your posts because of said attitude.

Om has, on occasion, a 'I am in charge here, listen to me, dammit' attitude
as well but at least I get his point.

That's it for me, back to lurking

"Alejandro Zuzek" wrote in message
...
On Jan 15, 4:06 pm, OM wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:15:48 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Why do people need to be spoonfed?

...Why do you have to be such a ****ing egotistical jerkwad? It's bad
(snip)

Bottom Line: A *LOT* of us have had enough. Pull that corncob out of
your ass, get with the program and start participating *with* the
regulars around here, or go **** yourself somewhere else. Enough is
enough.

Thanks OM, you expressed it far better as I could.

Tell us, OM, how you *really* feel...:P

OM wrote:
:
:...I've been on the sci.space.* groups for over two decades now,
:

Newby...


--
"Well, I met a girl in West Hollywood. I ain't naming names.
She really worked me over good. She was just like Jesse James.
She really worked me over good. She was a credit to her gender.
She put me through some changes, Lord.
Sort of like a Waring blender."
-- Warren Zevon, "Poor, Poor, Pitiful Me"

On Jan 15, 1:06 pm, OM wrote:

We've seen egotistical schmucks

Guess you are looking in a mirror

.I've been on the sci.space.* groups for over two decades now, and
with .history since its inception.

That looks good on a resume

I will stay on my high horse since you don't have anything close to my
credentials

wrote:

I will stay on my high horse since you don't have anything close to my
credentials

Yes, Jim, but this is the usernets, remember?

*Who needs credibility here?* :-)

Those were the days.

We long ago totally smashed the credentialist's paradigm here.

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:52:04 -0800 (PST), Alejandro Zuzek
wrote:

Thanks OM, you expressed it far better as I could. I was about to
answer to him in a much softer tone when I saw your post. There is so
much noise in the sci.space groups that a simple, on topic question
should rank quite high.

....Agreed. This particular dip**** seems more enthralled with his own
voice and rantings contained therein rather than actually contributing
anything of merit without trying to twist it into "Well, I'm an expert
at everything except wiping my ass, so you'd better listen to me or
you're just a troll!"

I've been basically a lurker since 1998, occasionally asking a
question that would spawn an interesting discussion, but that's
basically it. My area of expertise is IT and there isn't much that I
can contribute here.

....Your level of expertise is really mox nix. The fact that you're NOT
asking honest questions in hopes of an answer with a hidden agenda -
as one particular Conspiracy Troll is seriously prone to do - is what
we have no problems with. "We" being defined as the regulars around
the sci.space.* groups, and not sanctimoneous prigs like Behlinger or
whatever his real name is.

I do miss Henry, I used him to detect interesting threads.

....Henry is needed back now more than ever, especially to help shove
this dickwad's blatherings down his throat.

Bottom Line: you - and anyone else reading this - just keep asking
intelligent questions for the sheer sake of the knowledge to be
gained, and we'll keep on doing our best to answer them. And *******s
like Beh-whatever can quite simply go straight to Hell.

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

OM wrote:

Bottom Line: you - and anyone else reading this - just keep asking
intelligent questions for the sheer sake of the knowledge to be
gained, and we'll keep on doing our best to answer them. And *******s
like Beh-whatever can quite simply go straight to Hell.

Please tell us how you intend to solve this problem :

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

and this one :

http://www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop

and this one :

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

and this one too, if you have the time :

http://www.actionbioscience.org/newf...eldredge2.html

and of course, there is always this :

http://echo.jpl.nasa.gov/~lance/rada....radar.aei.gif

Hurry, billions of lives are at stake.

OM wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:15:48 -0800 (PST), wrote:

... You popped on here claiming to be some sort of
NASA engineer, and yet you've refused to give any proof to back your
credentials.

Didn't Kim Keller say that he worked with Jim?

Not that I'm encouraging anyone to be abusive or anything :-\

--
Dave Michelson

OM wrote:
Bottom Line: you - and anyone else reading this - just keep asking
intelligent questions for the sheer sake of the knowledge to be
gained,

There is a group of "we know it all" people here who decide who can and
can't ask questions. Some of those are actually extremely respected by
those who don't know what goes on behind the scenes.

And once they have labeled a person a certain way (whether warranted or
not) he remains blacklisted and his questions , whether intelligent or
not, are never dealt with.