![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 08:07:45 -0800, SkySea wrote:
Pete Lawrence wrote: Yes, of course Hubble could beat an Earth based amature result hands down. It's just a bit of fun and confirmation for me that what I process is real not artifact. Hubble is a fantastic reference point to check this sort of thing with. I'm not trying to denigrate the Hubble result in any way and there's no scientific usefulness to the comparision apart from a personal check. Thanks - my questions came from my own ignorance. But a very valid question nonetheless ![]() -- Pete Lawrence http://www.digitalsky.org.uk |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hubble vs C-14 | Pete Lawrence | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | December 26th 07 04:08 PM |
How do we keep Hubble up there? | richard schumacher | Policy | 28 | January 31st 05 06:19 PM |
How do we keep Hubble up there? | Ralph Hertle | Misc | 2 | January 24th 05 01:26 AM |
Hubble | John Griffin | Astronomy Misc | 8 | January 23rd 04 07:40 PM |
The other hubble | Hallerb | History | 15 | January 23rd 04 03:24 AM |