![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(ed kyle) wrote:
Clearly, these people deserve some kind of memorial. Why? D. -- The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found at the following URLs: Text-Only Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html Enhanced HTML Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html Corrections, comments, and additions should be e-mailed to , as well as posted to sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for discussion. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Clearly, these people deserve some kind of memorial. Why? They gave their life for the space program, and should be rembered. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gray wrote: (I interpreted "rocket related" as "in a rocket accident" - accidental firing, pad explosion, that sort of thing, which is why the qualifier) Has anyone mentioned the deaths of Sidney Dagle, Lott Gabel, and John Fassett when the X-248 solid fuel motor for the OSO-B prematurely fired due to static discharge while it was being mated to the spacecraft, in April of 1964? Pat |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(ed kyle) wrote:
(Derek Lyons) wrote in message ... (ed kyle) wrote: Clearly, these people deserve some kind of memorial. Why? Grissom, White, and Chaffee died in a horrible fire during a ground test. They are memorialized, in more than one location. The three men who died in the Delta Spin Test Facility also died in a horrible fire during a ground test. In both instances, the deaths taught critical lessons that improved safety - and helped advance the progress of space exploration. So we should memorialize their parents for raising such children? Their children for the accident of having chosen the right parents? Where does it end? I've heard stories about how terrible the Delta solid motor accident was, especially for the survivors. I'm not saying there should be a fancy monument, but there should be something to help the next generation remember those lessons. A far better memorial is to be found in engineering literature, not in a plaque that will be forgotten in a year or two. D. -- The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found at the following URLs: Text-Only Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html Enhanced HTML Version: http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html Corrections, comments, and additions should be e-mailed to , as well as posted to sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for discussion. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Derek Lyons ) writes:
(ed kyle) wrote: (Derek Lyons) wrote in message ... (ed kyle) wrote: Clearly, these people deserve some kind of memorial. Why? Grissom, White, and Chaffee died in a horrible fire during a ground test. They are memorialized, in more than one location. The three men who died in the Delta Spin Test Facility also died in a horrible fire during a ground test. In both instances, the deaths taught critical lessons that improved safety - and helped advance the progress of space exploration. So we should memorialize their parents for raising such children? Their children for the accident of having chosen the right parents? Where does it end? Indeed. Its simply not possible to " A List " memorialise everyone. For one thing, we don't have enough storage space inside of our skulls to hold such huge stores of essentially useless and unconnected to our lives data. Thats what things like books are for, so that we can find in them, what we don't recall at the time that we think of wanting to know. So, books about the history of human endeavours are the best memorial for such people that we can usefully offer. Along with an understanding that putting up major memorials is to be reserved for the truely special, on whatever basis we judge events to be such. And, to don a bit of asbestos for a sec, this is one thing that rather annoys me about things like the WTC memorial plans. Turning that place into wholly dedicated memorial for the events/people there, seems to be to be a bit overdoing it. A better memorial for them, IMHO, would be to build some kind of functional building/sets of buildings there, along with a tasteful memorial that would not scream into all who pass by faces, that " this is what this place is all about ! ". After all, doesn't the history of that place *before* 9/11/01 mean anything ? I've heard stories about how terrible the Delta solid motor accident was, especially for the survivors. I'm not saying there should be a fancy monument, but there should be something to help the next generation remember those lessons. A far better memorial is to be found in engineering literature, not in a plaque that will be forgotten in a year or two. Indeed. These kinds of calls for mass memorials tend to be meant to be *substitutes* for what was being reached for... Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Andre Lieven) wrote: Derek Lyons ) writes: (ed kyle) wrote: (Derek Lyons) wrote in message ... (ed kyle) wrote: Clearly, these people deserve some kind of memorial. Why? Grissom, White, and Chaffee died in a horrible fire during a ground test. They are memorialized, in more than one location. The three men who died in the Delta Spin Test Facility also died in a horrible fire during a ground test. In both instances, the deaths taught critical lessons that improved safety - and helped advance the progress of space exploration. So we should memorialize their parents for raising such children? Their children for the accident of having chosen the right parents? Where does it end? Indeed. Its simply not possible to " A List " memorialise everyone. For one thing, we don't have enough storage space inside of our skulls to hold such huge stores of essentially useless and unconnected to our lives data. Thats what things like books are for, so that we can find in them, what we don't recall at the time that we think of wanting to know. So, books about the history of human endeavours are the best memorial for such people that we can usefully offer. Along with an understanding that putting up major memorials is to be reserved for the truely special, on whatever basis we judge events to be such. And, to don a bit of asbestos for a sec, this is one thing that rather annoys me about things like the WTC memorial plans. Turning that place into wholly dedicated memorial for the events/people there, seems to be to be a bit overdoing it. A better memorial for them, IMHO, would be to build some kind of functional building/sets of buildings there, along with a tasteful memorial that would not scream into all who pass by faces, that " this is what this place is all about ! ". Oh, but that's just the _deal_ with Nine-Eleventm memorials; they just aren't doing their duty for State propaganda if they _don't_ shout "this is what it's all about". How can Dubya get his propaganda message out if it's not totally obvious he's wielding his bullhorn at Ground Zerotm? You get a look at what they want to build on Ground Zerotm? If there's any message at all in that horrid, angular, inorganic, ponderous pile, it's that our society is even more arrogant than before and has learned absolutely zippo from Nine-Eleventm, except perhaps how to turn tragedies like these into one's own personal Reichstag Fire. After all, doesn't the history of that place *before* 9/11/01 mean anything? Iirc, the WTC towers were fairly reviled among many NYCers for being sterile and ugly, the builders' monuments to themselves, an example of something that you shouldn't do just because you can -- in this case, absurdly, freakishly tall buildings. I've heard stories about how terrible the Delta solid motor accident was, especially for the survivors. I'm not saying there should be a fancy monument, but there should be something to help the next generation remember those lessons... One of the most moving memorials to anything or anybody, imho, is the remnants of the base of the service structure at Pad 34, where the paint-stenciled instruction "ABANDON IN PLACE" has been spotted and eroded until it now appears to read "ABANDON IN PEACE". I also liked the infamous East German TV Network tower with a spherical observation deck enclosure near the top whose faceted surfaces continually refracted sunlight in the shape of a cross, no matter what the East German construction engineers tried to do to prevent it. -- "All over, people changing their roles, along with their overcoats; if Adolf Hitler flew in today, they'd send a limousine anyway!" --the clash. __________________________________________________ _________________ Mike Flugennock, flugennock at sinkers dot org Mike Flugennock's Mikey'zine, dubya dubya dubya dot sinkers dot org |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Indeed. Its simply not possible to " A List " memorialise everyone. Hey! A memorial at KSC for everyone who died while futhering the space program would be a nice thing. As far as WTC, face facts thats what that place will always be, the opening attack in a never ending war. Justr for that reason it should be memoralized. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Flugennock ) writes:
In article , (Andre Lieven) wrote: Derek Lyons ) writes: (ed kyle) wrote: (Derek Lyons) wrote in message ... (ed kyle) wrote: Clearly, these people deserve some kind of memorial. Why? Grissom, White, and Chaffee died in a horrible fire during a ground test. They are memorialized, in more than one location. The three men who died in the Delta Spin Test Facility also died in a horrible fire during a ground test. In both instances, the deaths taught critical lessons that improved safety - and helped advance the progress of space exploration. So we should memorialize their parents for raising such children? Their children for the accident of having chosen the right parents? Where does it end? Indeed. Its simply not possible to " A List " memorialise everyone. For one thing, we don't have enough storage space inside of our skulls to hold such huge stores of essentially useless and unconnected to our lives data. Thats what things like books are for, so that we can find in them, what we don't recall at the time that we think of wanting to know. So, books about the history of human endeavours are the best memorial for such people that we can usefully offer. Along with an understanding that putting up major memorials is to be reserved for the truely special, on whatever basis we judge events to be such. And, to don a bit of asbestos for a sec, this is one thing that rather annoys me about things like the WTC memorial plans. Turning that place into wholly dedicated memorial for the events/people there, seems to be to be a bit overdoing it. A better memorial for them, IMHO, would be to build some kind of functional building/sets of buildings there, along with a tasteful memorial that would not scream into all who pass by faces, that " this is what this place is all about ! ". Oh, but that's just the _deal_ with Nine-Eleventm memorials; they just aren't doing their duty for State propaganda if they _don't_ shout "this is what it's all about". How can Dubya get his propaganda message out if it's not totally obvious he's wielding his bullhorn at Ground Zerotm? Well, it might not be finished even in time for him having a second term... Vis Apollo, to come back to an ssh topic... g You get a look at what they want to build on Ground Zerotm? If there's any message at all in that horrid, angular, inorganic, ponderous pile, it's that our society is even more arrogant than before and has learned absolutely zippo from Nine-Eleventm, except perhaps how to turn tragedies like these into one's own personal Reichstag Fire. Yeah, I've seen some of the current crop of designs, in media reports on them, and I can't say that I'm positively impressed by any of them. A simple Vietnam Memorial wall like thing, off to one side, or along the footptints of the towers, while new buildings, towars, some, perhaps, would be the way to go, IMHO. A sign that we remember, without saying that we do nothing *but* " remember " ( Read: " wallow in it, ad nauseum " ). Plus, a pair of new towers, say, 111 stories tall, would stand like a pair of upturned fingers to the Bad Guys... After all, doesn't the history of that place *before* 9/11/01 mean anything? Iirc, the WTC towers were fairly reviled among many NYCers for being sterile and ugly, the builders' monuments to themselves, an example of something that you shouldn't do just because you can -- in this case, absurdly, freakishly tall buildings. Well, a couple of the histories that I've read of them suggest that they became comfortably accpeted by the city, and by folks from far away, too. Heck, Channel 11 in NYC used them as a station logo. And, I rather liked what I saw of them, when I was there in March of 2000. Even had dinner in Windows On The World. That was... tres kewl. I've heard stories about how terrible the Delta solid motor accident was, especially for the survivors. I'm not saying there should be a fancy monument, but there should be something to help the next generation remember those lessons... One of the most moving memorials to anything or anybody, imho, is the remnants of the base of the service structure at Pad 34, where the paint-stenciled instruction "ABANDON IN PLACE" has been spotted and eroded until it now appears to read "ABANDON IN PEACE". Ah. I would have liked to have seen that. My one time at Canaveral, was short enough that only going on one tour was possible, and we chose the shuttle/Saturn V one, in Sept 1992. Have you read Jerry Oltion's ( sp ? ) novella of the same name ? Nicely done. I also liked the infamous East German TV Network tower with a spherical observation deck enclosure near the top whose faceted surfaces continually refracted sunlight in the shape of a cross, no matter what the East German construction engineers tried to do to prevent it. g Some statements... get made, no matter what. Andre -- " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. " The Man Prayer, Red Green. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:13:59 -0600, Brian Thorn wrote (in
part): On 4 Dec 2003 18:04:18 GMT, Andrew Gray wrote: Okay. What was America's worst rocket related accident with the greatest loss of life? As part of the US space program? Two technicians were killed in Columbia in March '81, although this isn't really "rocket related". Yes, it is. John Bjornstad and Forest Cole died either in Columbia's Aft Compartment or in one of the Tail Service Masts at the launch pad, depending on the source. Was that the nitrogen asphyxiation case? Chris W |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brazilian Space Program Leaders Blamed for Accident | Rusty Barton | Policy | 0 | March 17th 04 12:38 AM |
Columbia accident related video website | x24val | Policy | 0 | January 26th 04 04:39 PM |
NASA Administrator Accepts Columbia Accident Report | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 3 | August 27th 03 04:48 PM |
NEWS: Redstone rocket turns golden today - Huntsville Times | Rusty B | History | 0 | August 20th 03 10:42 PM |