|
|
#1
November 17th 07, 12:35 AM
posted to sci.space.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Ares vs DIRECT
I am sure y'all have beat this topic to death but I was not paying
attention. However, is NASA completely committed to ARES/ARESV or is there still some chance they may choose DIRECT? It looks to me as if they could still choose DIRECT if they wanted cuz they havent started any sig work on Ares. I do not have enough info to decide which is better. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I've added FOUR updates to my Ares-1 article with some NEW calculations that (clearly) show WHY the new Ares-1 can't fly | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | November 12th 07 10:21 AM |
| NewSpace rockets __ EELVs __ Ares-I __ REVISED Orion/Ares-I __ FAST-SLV __ chances of success | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | June 16th 07 12:03 AM |
| DIRECT v2.0 | Jonathan Goff | Policy | 2 | May 11th 07 10:41 AM |
| in my opinion (both) Ares-I and Ares-V could NEVER fly once! ...could NASA rockets win vs. privates on launch date and prices? | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | May 10th 07 11:11 PM |
| direct sunshine | Henry | Misc | 1 | January 1st 04 04:03 PM |
Threaded Mode