Use of Black Holes ???

On Jul 14, 9:06 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double -A Can my ego be taking over if I theorize G=EMC^2 kicks in at
the length,and spacetime of a Planck before stuff enters a black hole. I
can see GR and SR emerging at this instant. bert


Whatever kicks in at the Planck length is uncertain, don't you thing?

Double-A

Double-A Its true a Planck length can not mean that much to us in the
huge size of the Macro world that is measured in light years.
Still it is where gravity and cosmic space energy make their home. It
is Planck's tiny dimension that is the building block of universes.
bert

On Jul 14, 12:31 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

It
is Planck's tiny dimension that is the building block of universes.

Yep. The great bulk of 'What Is', in terms of its wavelength-state/
'granularity', resides below the Planck theshold.. its perceived
"void"-ness belying its extreme energy state. In scale terms, the
energy density *of space itself* is to nuclear what nuclear is to
chemical.. and could be fancifully expressed as "E=mc^3". oc

oc Your late friend Wolter would like to theorize that there is Planck
gravity,and its the source of all gravity created forces(the other 3)
and is bring its force home we see and measure this push as gravity
holding stuff in place(inertia) and pushing stuff together as
gravitation. That give the reason why inertia,and gravity are two sides
to the same coin. Maybe not exactly right,but nothing is exact. bert