![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... : On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:28:36 +0100, "OG" : wrote: : : This is one of the very best examples I've seen of this : http://www.popularscience.co.uk/features/feat16.htm : : Very good. Look at these, : http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/...1199_1010.html , for : similar examples with color. : : Basically, the eye/brain is very poor at discriminating absolute : intensities or colors. : Yes, that is true. There are even crackpots who wildly imagine a star can be occulted by a dark body as large as the star itself and never realize the cause of the optical illusion is c+v. Such people are too stupid to calculate how the luminosity regularly varies as a function of a star's relative velocity. They are also the same cretins to cry "crackpot" at the first opportunity. "But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v" -- Einstein http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Hobbs wrote:
Louis Boyd wrote: Guy Macon wrote: brian wrote: Sometimes, when I see the moon lit by earthshine, against a twilit sky, it looks as if the unlit part of the moon is actually darker than the background sky - as if the moon is silhouetted against the sky. This shouldn't be physically possible. Has anyone here noticed this? Is it an optical illusion, and can anyone here explain it? Next time you see that, grab a camera and take a picture. If it's not the same as what you see, it's an optical illusion. If it *is* the same as what you see, then I would really like someone to explain the effect to me. It seems impossible. I haven't personally noticed that phenomena. It might be possible if the Moon is positioned in line with one of the brighter parts of the Milky Way Galaxy (in the general area of Sagittarius) and the area of reflection of sunlight off of the Earth toward the Moon is from a land mass less reflective than an ocean. Sometimes "Earth shine" is rather weak. The Milky Way is orders of magnitude dimmer than twilight. It's invisible even at midnight when you're near a city. Where I am, I have to go way out into the country to see it at all. There's a strong optical illusion operating--the one that makes your eye connect up circles and squares when only portions of them are actually visible. If you think about the geometry, the portion of the sunlit Earth seen by any point on the near side of the Moon is just about equal to the proportion of the dark part of the Moon as seen from the Earth. At full moon, the dark hemisphere of the Earth faces the Moon, and at new moon, it's the bright hemisphere of the Earth. At half moon, the Moon sees a half-Earth. Except near full moon, then, the brightness of earthshine isn't very different from night to night. If there's a large area of dark Moon showing, then the earthshine is bright. Cheers, Phil Hobbs To add to the geometry portion of the discussion, the reflectivity of earth is dependent upon the percentage of cloud cover. More clouds more light reflected. Not sure if it is enough to see a difference in moon illumination though. P. Danek |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 22, 4:35 am, brian wrote:
Sometimes, when I see the moon lit by earthshine, against a twilit sky, it looks as if the unlit part of the moon is actually darker than the background sky - as if the moon is silhouetted against the sky. This shouldn't be physically possible. Has anyone here noticed this? Is it an optical illusion, and can anyone here explain it? It is not an optical illusion. Until astronomical twilight about an hour after sunset, the twilight sky has significant residual brightness. This residual brightness can be brighter than the dark side of the Moon. In terms of the photographer's B light scale and an EV value, the setting sky has brightnesses of: Sunset, 10 minutes after 120, 9 Sunset, 30 minutes after 0.93, 2 Civil twilight (about 30 min after sunset) 0.46, 1 Night, away from city lights, subject under full moon. 0.3, -3 Night, away from city lights, subject under half moon. __, -4 Night, away from city lights, subject under crescent moon __, -5 Night, away from city lights, subject under starlight only. __, -6 Rural night sky 0.00001, -15 Although I do not have a specific B value for the dark terminator side of the Moon, during a partially lunar eclipse, the umbra and penumbra portions of the Moon have a B of about 0.25. This is darker than the brightness of civil twilight. After astronomical twilight, the dark side of the Moon is brighter than the background sky, which can easily be seen even in light polluted skies using binoculars. - Canopus56 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() canopus56 wrote: brian wrote: Sometimes, when I see the moon lit by earthshine, against a twilit sky, it looks as if the unlit part of the moon is actually darker than the background sky - as if the moon is silhouetted against the sky. This shouldn't be physically possible. Has anyone here noticed this? Is it an optical illusion, and can anyone here explain it? It is not an optical illusion. Until astronomical twilight about an hour after sunset, the twilight sky has significant residual brightness. This residual brightness can be brighter than the dark side of the Moon. While it is true that the twilight sky has significant residual brightness that the midnight sky lacks, it is not true that this residual brightness occurs in the sky around the moon and not in the dark side of the moon. For that to be true, the residual brightness would have to be a change in the brightness of the sky behind the moon. In reality, the residual brightness is an atmospheric effect that is between the sky and the observer as well as being between the moon and the observer. -- Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 3:10 pm, Guy Macon http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote:
While it is true that the twilight sky has significant residual brightness that the midnight sky lacks, it is not true that this residual brightness occurs in the sky around the moon and not in the dark side of the moon. snip Guy Macon Good, common sense point, Guy. So the dark side of the Moon should always have as a minimum brightness, the sky's brightness, as we see the Moon during its three-quarter daylight passage. - Canopus56 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Guy Macon" http://www.guymacon.com/ wrote in message
... canopus56 wrote: brian wrote: Sometimes, when I see the moon lit by earthshine, against a twilit sky, it looks as if the unlit part of the moon is actually darker than the background sky - as if the moon is silhouetted against the sky. This shouldn't be physically possible. Has anyone here noticed this? Is it an optical illusion, and can anyone here explain it? It is not an optical illusion. Until astronomical twilight about an hour after sunset, the twilight sky has significant residual brightness. This residual brightness can be brighter than the dark side of the Moon. While it is true that the twilight sky has significant residual brightness that the midnight sky lacks, it is not true that this residual brightness occurs in the sky around the moon and not in the dark side of the moon. For that to be true, the residual brightness would have to be a change in the brightness of the sky behind the moon. In reality, the residual brightness is an atmospheric effect that is between the sky and the observer as well as being between the moon and the observer. Bingo. The twilight is in front of the moon, not behind it, so it should add to the brightness of the dark side of the moon. The question could certainly be settled by taking a photograph. A similar effect has been reported with Venus seen through a telescope at crescent phase. With Venus, silhouetting against the outermost solar corona has been advanced as a possible explanation. But it might well be an illusion. I wonder if color is part of the illusion. The earthlit part of the moon is gray and has more red in it than the surrounding twilight. Does red light perhaps desensitize the eye to blue to some extent? Going further -- I seem to recall that the unlit side of Venus is fairly bright in the infrared. Does infrared (even at invisible wavelengths) affect the eye's sensitivity to visible light? I seem to recall that some types of film are partly desensitized by infrared. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is this an optical illusion? | brian | Astronomy Misc | 15 | June 29th 07 03:46 AM |
Optical illusion concerning more than one moon | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | May 21st 07 11:10 AM |
OIL CRISIS AN OPTICAL ILLUSION-- Plenty of Gas Available -- Where There's a Will, There's a Whale | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 8th 07 01:13 AM |
Optical SETI and optical beacons | Rob Dekker | SETI | 8 | May 24th 04 11:24 PM |
Examples of optical illusion, not OT? | Scribe2b | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | September 28th 03 04:00 AM |