![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.optusnet.com.au/news/stor...raq-occupation
-mid.inp That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. Despicable! -- Alan Erskine alanerskine(at)optusnet.com.au Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction, Mr Bush? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Erskine wrote:
That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. And about three seconds worth of failed social welfare programs. Prioritise! -- Scott Lowther, Engineer "Any statement by Edward Wright that starts with 'You seem to think that...' is wrong. Always. It's a law of Usenet, like Godwin's." - Jorge R. Frank, 11 Nov 2002 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Lowther wrote: Alan Erskine wrote: That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. And about three seconds worth of failed social welfare programs. Prioritise! $1.33 billion/sec for social welfare programs. Okaaaay. Here's a nice pie chart of FY 2001: http://www.assmotax.org/Data/fedbud.php I believe most of what you call "failed social welfare programs" comes under "Income security" which totaled $228 billion. $48 billion of that is Federal workers retirement and disability which I don't regard as welfare. I believe $180 billion is what we spent on social welfare in 2001. $180 billion is a very distant third behind 2001's military expense (310 billion subtracting military retirement etc.) and Debt service (356 billion). I expect Military and Debt Service to surge even further ahead. Bush cuts taxes and increases spending. He's taking the U.S. deeper into credit card heaven. Here is a cartoon I made depicting this: http://clowder.net/hop/etc./Bush.jpg Hop http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hop David wrote:
Scott Lowther wrote: Alan Erskine wrote: That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. And about three seconds worth of failed social welfare programs. Prioritise! $1.33 billion/sec for social welfare programs. Okaaaay. Here's a nice pie chart of FY 2001: http://www.assmotax.org/Data/fedbud.php That, oddly, does not include Social Security, which is as memory serves a bigger chunk than the military. I expect Military and Debt Service to surge even further ahead. Bush cuts taxes and increases spending. He's taking the U.S. deeper into credit card heaven. Here is a cartoon I made depicting this: http://clowder.net/hop/etc./Bush.jpg A masterpiece. A masterpiece of half truths, of course. Cutting tax rates (thank you, Rand) stimulates the economy, and leads the increased tax REVENUES (you know that word, yes?). Fighting "expensive" wars such as Iraq *now*, when we can fight them on our own terms on the enemies territory is, of course, far cheaper than sitting on our asses and waiting for them to destroy American cities. Imagine how much better off Britain would have been had they in 1936 decided to wage an "expensive" war and slap down Hitler, or how much better off the US economy would be had the Clinton administration spent a few extra pennies and taken down bin Laden when given the chance, and thus prevented the hundredss of billions in economic damage due to 9-11. But I guess preventative measures are nowhere near as interesting as simply misrepresnting the situation for political gain, eh? -- Scott Lowther, Engineer "Any statement by Edward Wright that starts with 'You seem to think that...' is wrong. Always. It's a law of Usenet, like Godwin's." - Jorge R. Frank, 11 Nov 2002 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Lowther wrote:
Hop David wrote: Scott Lowther wrote: Alan Erskine wrote: That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. And about three seconds worth of failed social welfare programs. Prioritise! $1.33 billion/sec for social welfare programs. Okaaaay. Here's a nice pie chart of FY 2001: http://www.assmotax.org/Data/fedbud.php I believe most of what you call "failed social welfare programs" comes under "Income security" which totaled $228 billion. $48 billion of that is Federal workers retirement and disability which I don't regard as welfare. I believe $180 billion is what we spent on social welfare in 2001. $180 billion is a very distant third behind 2001's military expense (310 billion subtracting military retirement etc.) and Debt service (356 billion). That, oddly, does not include Social Security, which is as memory serves a bigger chunk than the military. Ah, here we go: http://w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget/fy2001/guide02.html For 1999 actual numbers ($Billions): Military: 262 nonDoD Discrectioanry: 313 Social Security: 387 Medicare/medicaid: 296 Means-tested entitlements: 104 Other: 112 Now, my math may be a little rusty, but I suspect that $262B is somewhat less than $387B + $296B + $104B. And that $387B + $296B + $104B is rather MORE than $180B. -- Scott Lowther, Engineer "Any statement by Edward Wright that starts with 'You seem to think that...' is wrong. Always. It's a law of Usenet, like Godwin's." - Jorge R. Frank, 11 Nov 2002 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott Lowther wrote: Ah, here we go: http://w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget/fy2001/guide02.html For 1999 actual numbers ($Billions): Military: 262 nonDoD Discrectioanry: 313 Social Security: 387 Medicare/medicaid: 296 My father-in-law spent most of his life as a heavy equipment operator. My dad worked most of his life in printshops. They both received social security and medicare benefits. Are you saying they were welfare parasites? Means-tested entitlements: 104 Other: 112 Now, my math may be a little rusty, but I suspect that $262B is somewhat less than $387B + $296B + $104B. And that $387B + $296B + $104B is rather MORE than $180B. For the sake of argument I'll accept 787 billion/year going to crackhead welfare cheats. That's about $25000/sec. I believe $25000/sec is rather less than $4 billion/3 seconds. Hop http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Lowther :
Scott Lowther wrote: Hop David wrote: Scott Lowther wrote: Alan Erskine wrote: That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. And about three seconds worth of failed social welfare programs. Prioritise! $1.33 billion/sec for social welfare programs. Okaaaay. Here's a nice pie chart of FY 2001: http://www.assmotax.org/Data/fedbud.php I believe most of what you call "failed social welfare programs" comes under "Income security" which totaled $228 billion. $48 billion of that is Federal workers retirement and disability which I don't regard as welfare. I believe $180 billion is what we spent on social welfare in 2001. $180 billion is a very distant third behind 2001's military expense (310 billion subtracting military retirement etc.) and Debt service (356 billion). That, oddly, does not include Social Security, which is as memory serves a bigger chunk than the military. Ah, here we go: http://w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget/fy2001/guide02.html For 1999 actual numbers ($Billions): Military: 262 nonDoD Discrectioanry: 313 Social Security: 387 Medicare/medicaid: 296 Means-tested entitlements: 104 Other: 112 Now, my math may be a little rusty, but I suspect that $262B is somewhat less than $387B + $296B + $104B. And that $387B + $296B + $104B is rather MORE than $180B. Thanks, Still more useful information. I see I am going to be doing a lot of reading this weekend. To those of you out there who wonder why I am acting this way, it is simple - Atleast David and Scott are suppling figures behind their beliefs. Too many time this group is filled with people who claim that thier way is best without post any numbers to back thier claims. Numbers can be made to lie, but you can only twist them so far before it stands out that you are making false claims. Here I get a chance to review and make up my own mind. I just wish more space.policy threads supplied numbers with thier arguements. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hop David :
Scott Lowther wrote: Alan Erskine wrote: That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. And about three seconds worth of failed social welfare programs. Prioritise! $1.33 billion/sec for social welfare programs. Okaaaay. Here's a nice pie chart of FY 2001: http://www.assmotax.org/Data/fedbud.php I believe most of what you call "failed social welfare programs" comes under "Income security" which totaled $228 billion. $48 billion of that is Federal workers retirement and disability which I don't regard as welfare. I believe $180 billion is what we spent on social welfare in 2001. $180 billion is a very distant third behind 2001's military expense (310 billion subtracting military retirement etc.) and Debt service (356 billion). I expect Military and Debt Service to surge even further ahead. Bush cuts taxes and increases spending. He's taking the U.S. deeper into credit card heaven. Here is a cartoon I made depicting this: http://clowder.net/hop/etc./Bush.jpg Hop http://clowder.net/hop/index.html Again, while I don't agree with you at the moment, thanks for the additional URL. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:03:18 +1000, "Alan Erskine"
wrote: http://www.optusnet.com.au/news/stor...raq-occupation -mid.inp That's how much Iraq is costing just the U.S. - almost enough for a new manned Moon program every month. Don't forget that the US has had a sizable military presence in the Middle East continuously since 1991 (including during eight years of Clinton). Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia (now mothballed) for example. The actual cost over previous years is not that great. Despicable! Australia did not participate militarily in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Please ask your government to take that $4 Billion a month they're saving and spend it on a manned Moon program. Report back your results, please. Brian |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Thorn wrote...
... Australia did not participate militarily in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Huh? * 250 airmen and women and support crews deployed with a squadron of 14 F/A-18 Royal Australian Air Force Hornet fighter aircraft. * 150 personnel deployed with three RAAF C130 Hercules transport aircraft. * 150 personnel deployed with two P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft. * An Air Forward Command Element of about 70 personnel responsible for coordinating air operations with coalition partners and providing national control of RAAF assets. * 350 sailors and soldiers embarked on the sea transport ship HMAS Kanimbla with a Sea King helicopter, Army landing craft and Army air defence detachment and a specialist explosives ordnance team. * 600 personnel embarked on Royal Australian Navy frigates HMAS Anzac and Darwin, who have been part of the Multinational Interception Force enforcing United Nations sanctions against Iraq. * A Navy clearance diver team capable of locating, rendering safe and disposing of mines. * A Special Forces Task Group of about 500 personnel. The Task Group comprises an advance party including a Special Air Service squadron, CH-47 troop-lift helicopters and personnel from 5th Aviation Regiment, specialist troops to deal with the threat of weapons of mass destruction drawn from the newly-established Incident Response Regiment based at Holsworthy, New South Wales and a quick reaction support force drawn from the Holsworthy-based 4RAR Commando unit. * An Australian National Headquarters of approximately 60 personnel, headed by the Australian National Commander, Brigadier Maurie McNarn. I guess if you don't count the 2,000 Australian personnel and the military hardware that accompanied them, and the specialist operations that they performed on and off the battlefield, then you have a point. Considering Australia's population, and Australia's commitment to other operations, this was a very substantial contribution. Read a newspaper and.... Report back your results, please. Monte. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's Finances in Disarray; $565 Billion in Adjustments | Don Corleone | Space Shuttle | 8 | May 18th 04 03:19 PM |
NASA Moon-Mars Price Tag at $229 Billion, not $1 Trillion | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 36 | May 5th 04 09:18 AM |
1 billion pounds of US dollars + 1 billion rubles=2 billion pounds | Lynndel Humphreys | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 29th 03 07:01 PM |
Cost of launch and laws of physics | Greg Kuperberg | Policy | 235 | August 30th 03 10:20 PM |
Only 33 billion for a space colony?? Thats only 15 B-2's! | Tony Rusi | Policy | 17 | July 15th 03 08:40 PM |