![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"J. Cartolano" wrote in message
om... All the nitpicking makes simply no sense enjoy the movies for what they are an oral retelling of classic literature. My only complaints are the intensity and duration of on-screen violence, and the ridiculous depiction of the Orcs. Jackson must have been influenced by Burton, whose dark outlook totally sucks visually. Batman is another example of that genre of heavily Goth visual crap. I'm not that familiar with the books. Although I have read them in bits and pieces here and there over the years, I don't have an intimate knowledge of the characters or the details of their personal involvements in the story. I was hoping to. Interestingly, a segment that aired on PBS discussing the author and the story, gave a wonderful synopsis, as well as a biography that indicated the author's motivations, and underlying themes. I have no doubt that in the minds of many, these movies are classics, and there was more in them that I enjoyed than there was that I didn't. I'm just not sure I'd be willing to sit through them again, unlike others which I am content to see over and over. I can only attribute that to my dislike for long battle scenes with hideous creatures, and crude weapons. I would however give the director a cinematography award just for the last scene of Frodo forcing himself to his feet on Mount Doom to face his ultimate personal challenge of destroying the ring. I just wish the rest of the movie had more of those scenes. Since in essence, it is that level of personal internal conflict that makes a great character. Just like Luke Skywalker when confronted with the Emperor, and Lara Croft in Tomb Raider II, where she _almost_ opens Pandora's box at the end. Talk about taking temptation and strength to the edge! I guess I wanted the LOTR movies to be an inspiration for us to persist in our personal struggles, not in our struggles as a race. I am more impressed with the guy who takes control of himself and gives up smoking cigarettes than I am with the guy who studies hard, and finds a cure for the cancer that would have killed the smoker if he hadn't quit. It was a great adventure though. No doubt about it. -Stephen Paul |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 04:47:15 GMT, in sci.astro.amateur you wrote:
In article om, (Stuart Levy) wrote: I'll see it again for more of those details, even with regret. But if Middle-earth isn't a familiar world, I'm not sure what the movies will do for you except being a high-powered action film and an impressive demonstration of computer graphics. Stuart Levy [Massive snip of which I agree with almost every word.] Bravo. I love the books, which I have read at least a half dozen times though not once in the past half dozen years or so. I loved the movies. They're not totally faithful to the books, but the overall vision, IMHO, is and they are more faithful to the books than I actually expected them to be. I could pick a few nits myself as most everyone who is a fan of the books could, but ROTK had to be one of the best if not the best movies I have ever seen. Personally I rather like longish battle scenes with brutish enemies swinging crude weapons. ;-) (Mainly joke for those that didn't catch it.) My daughter had not read the books before the movies came out. Now her and almost all of her friends are reading them, and she is reading it for her second time. My wife is considering reading them herself. If there is no other outcome from Peter Jackson's effort than these two results, I am more than satisfied by the outcome. Especially if my wife actually does read it. I assume my situation is not unique, I suspect that at this very minute across the world a whole new generation is reading these books and telling themselves, "Wow, Frodo rocks!". -sdg And that may be the best thing of all about the movies. Just as Harry Potter has kids who wouldn't normally sit still long enough to read a chapter enthralled enough to read and re-read the entire series, the last a pretty massive volume only available for now, AFAIK, in hardback, the LOTR movies will have folks of all ages discovering Tolkien who otherwise would not have. And that will lead them to other fantasy, maybe to sci-fi and...the impact could be enormous. Roger "Rumors of My Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated" Cole -- Remove "SPAMPRUF" to email me. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 04:47:15 GMT, in sci.astro.amateur you wrote:
In article om, (Stuart Levy) wrote: I'll see it again for more of those details, even with regret. But if Middle-earth isn't a familiar world, I'm not sure what the movies will do for you except being a high-powered action film and an impressive demonstration of computer graphics. Stuart Levy [Massive snip of which I agree with almost every word.] Bravo. I love the books, which I have read at least a half dozen times though not once in the past half dozen years or so. I loved the movies. They're not totally faithful to the books, but the overall vision, IMHO, is and they are more faithful to the books than I actually expected them to be. I could pick a few nits myself as most everyone who is a fan of the books could, but ROTK had to be one of the best if not the best movies I have ever seen. Personally I rather like longish battle scenes with brutish enemies swinging crude weapons. ;-) (Mainly joke for those that didn't catch it.) My daughter had not read the books before the movies came out. Now her and almost all of her friends are reading them, and she is reading it for her second time. My wife is considering reading them herself. If there is no other outcome from Peter Jackson's effort than these two results, I am more than satisfied by the outcome. Especially if my wife actually does read it. I assume my situation is not unique, I suspect that at this very minute across the world a whole new generation is reading these books and telling themselves, "Wow, Frodo rocks!". -sdg And that may be the best thing of all about the movies. Just as Harry Potter has kids who wouldn't normally sit still long enough to read a chapter enthralled enough to read and re-read the entire series, the last a pretty massive volume only available for now, AFAIK, in hardback, the LOTR movies will have folks of all ages discovering Tolkien who otherwise would not have. And that will lead them to other fantasy, maybe to sci-fi and...the impact could be enormous. Roger "Rumors of My Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated" Cole -- Remove "SPAMPRUF" to email me. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 04:47:15 GMT, in sci.astro.amateur you wrote:
In article om, (Stuart Levy) wrote: I'll see it again for more of those details, even with regret. But if Middle-earth isn't a familiar world, I'm not sure what the movies will do for you except being a high-powered action film and an impressive demonstration of computer graphics. Stuart Levy [Massive snip of which I agree with almost every word.] Bravo. I love the books, which I have read at least a half dozen times though not once in the past half dozen years or so. I loved the movies. They're not totally faithful to the books, but the overall vision, IMHO, is and they are more faithful to the books than I actually expected them to be. I could pick a few nits myself as most everyone who is a fan of the books could, but ROTK had to be one of the best if not the best movies I have ever seen. Personally I rather like longish battle scenes with brutish enemies swinging crude weapons. ;-) (Mainly joke for those that didn't catch it.) My daughter had not read the books before the movies came out. Now her and almost all of her friends are reading them, and she is reading it for her second time. My wife is considering reading them herself. If there is no other outcome from Peter Jackson's effort than these two results, I am more than satisfied by the outcome. Especially if my wife actually does read it. I assume my situation is not unique, I suspect that at this very minute across the world a whole new generation is reading these books and telling themselves, "Wow, Frodo rocks!". -sdg And that may be the best thing of all about the movies. Just as Harry Potter has kids who wouldn't normally sit still long enough to read a chapter enthralled enough to read and re-read the entire series, the last a pretty massive volume only available for now, AFAIK, in hardback, the LOTR movies will have folks of all ages discovering Tolkien who otherwise would not have. And that will lead them to other fantasy, maybe to sci-fi and...the impact could be enormous. Roger "Rumors of My Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated" Cole -- Remove "SPAMPRUF" to email me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Rings Around The Planets: Recycling Of Material May Extend Ring Lifetimes(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 10th 03 03:59 PM |
Telescope for Child | Vedo | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | November 21st 03 03:38 PM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | November 11th 03 08:16 AM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 5th 03 09:27 PM |