New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

If you want to know what are electric and magnetic (force) fluxes, open yo=
ur high school physics text and see their distributive maps near electric c=
harges and magnetic poles. If you have no such text, open Dr. Yoon's webpag=
e(www.yoonsatom.net) and see P-3 of EXCERPT. Then you will find two kinds o=
f maps of electric and magnetic fluxes drawn by light dusts and iron filing=
s=2E These mass particles are not intellect to arrange themselves along the=
field lines, your dummy particle physicists think. It signifies that there=
exist real force fluxes, though invisible, emanated from electric charge a=
nd magnetic poles. Can you see radio-waves with your naked eyes? No! You c=
annot! But they exist in reality! right?. These radio-waves are built with =
these same kind of electric and magnetic fluxes, and radiated from their an=
tenna. When one wants to send his song utilizing this radio-wave, these ele=
ctric and magnetic fluxes being modulated depending on his acoustic signals=
.. This type is called analogs. You see? By the way do you know how these =
electromagnetic waves can be generated by their resonant circuits and anten=
nas? I can surely say your particle physicist are totally ignorant for thi=
s critically important science, because I know your particle physicist cann=
ot even differentiate electromagnetic waves from acoustic waves. So you hav=
e really my sympathy you cannot understand the electric and magnetic fluxes=
emanated from electric charge and magnetic poles, and made maps, but belie=
ve these are field lines invariant and solid even if charges and magnet pol=
es move at a fast speed.
If you want to know how atoms with such tiny dimensions, can generate
electromagnetic waves with such a variety of wavelengths or
frequencies, ranging from =CE=B3-rays to microwaves being used as NMR
signals, you better read Dr. Yoon's text. This is really an
un-precedented new science in the history of human science. He explains
the mechanism of generating these various kinds of electromagnetic
waves with exactly the same principle as that utilized to explain
radio-waves, and says that since all of these energy waves belong to
the same family they have to have the same mechanism of generating
them. Otherwise they are not the same family or our science is
incorrect. It is quite a surprise! newedana

newedana wrote:
If you want to know what are electric and magnetic (force) fluxes, open =
your high school physics text and see their distributive maps near electric=
charges and magnetic poles. If you have no such text, open Dr. Yoon's webp=
age(www.yoonsatom.net) and see P-3 of EXCERPT. Then you will find two kinds=
of maps of electric and magnetic fluxes drawn by light dusts and iron fili=
ngs. These mass particles are not intellect to arrange themselves along the=
field lines, your dummy particle physicists think. It signifies that there=
exist real force fluxes, though invisible, emanated from electric charge a=
nd magnetic poles. Can you see radio-waves with your naked eyes? No! You c=
annot! But they exist in reality! right?. These radio-waves are built with =
these same kind of electric and magnetic fluxes, and radiated from their an=
tenna. When one wants to send his song utilizing this radio-wave, these ele=
ctric and magnetic fluxes being modulated depending on his acoustic signals=
.. This type is called analogs. You see? By the way do you know how these =
electromagnetic waves can be generated by their resonant circuits and anten=
nas? I can surely say your particle physicist are totally ignorant for thi=
s critically important science, because I know your particle physicist cann=
ot even differentiate electromagnetic waves from acoustic waves. So you hav=
e really my sympathy you cannot understand the electric and magnetic fluxes=
emanated from electric charge and magnetic poles, and made maps, but belie=
ve these are field lines invariant and solid even if charges and magnet pol=
es move at a fast speed.
If you want to know how atoms with such tiny dimensions, can generate
electromagnetic waves with such a variety of wavelengths or
frequencies, ranging from =CE=B3-rays to microwaves being used as NMR
signals, you better read Dr. Yoon's text. This is really an
un-precedented new science in the history of human science. He explains
the mechanism of generating these various kinds of electromagnetic
waves with exactly the same principle as that utilized to explain
radio-waves, and says that since all of these energy waves belong to
the same family they have to have the same mechanism of generating
them. Otherwise they are not the same family or our science is
incorrect. It is quite a surprise! newedana


Newedana. I like that part where he compares the generation of
electromagnetic wave in antenna to how electromagnetic can be
similarly generated in the atoms. In fact. That's why I think he
is creative and the book is worth it (really). But he is plain
wrong about the lagging electric field behind. It is possible
though that the precessional oscillation thing can be occuring yet
via another mechanism (maybe by combining it with the Aether or
quantum vacuum dynamics). So I guess we have to create our own
atomic model by modifying and improving some of Dr. Yoon ideas
which was disproven by experiments. I found the book as gem of
new ideas for modelers and inventors. Well. We bought the very
expensive book. So maybe let's try to build our atomic model in
silent and then release it after we write our own book. What do
you say? So try to spend a year or two brainstorming of ways to
modify Yoonmodel to make it compatible with all data in QM
which Yoon never did. To do it. First be familiar with the ins
and outs of QM and relativity as they really are.

p6

newedana the sci.physics village wrote:

[snip incorrect and incomprehensible garbage]

No, the electron has mass and has a negative charge. Always has and always will. Lloyd Paker

Can you explain with your electron and QM theory, the atomic volume of uranium atom has only 12.5, while that of hydrogen atom has 14.1, despite that uranium has 92 orbital electrons forming a large number of electron shells? In this case QM theory denies electrons repulse each other? Their energy becomes degenarated to lose repulsive force, and binds themselves to make such a ridiculous Cooper pair electrons by absorbing phonons? I sincerely advice you, please throw away such a fraudulent and comic-like science as soon as possible, and start to study a real and true science. newedana

Maxwell equation is not the electric and magnetic waves, but is a description of a phenomenal entity. You are mixing up with mathematical equation and phenomenal electromagnetic entities. It appears you do not know a rimary science that magnetic fluxes are made alway in perpendicular to electric fluxes. newedana

newedana the sci.physics village idiot wrote:

Maxwell equation is not the electric and magnetic waves, but is a description of a phenomenal entity. You are mixing up with mathematical equation and phenomenal electromagnetic entities. It appears you do not know a rimary science that magnetic fluxes are made alway in perpendicular to electric fluxes. newedana

hey incompetent fool, what is a flux? do you know that flux is a scalar
quantity dumbass? how can fluxes be perpendicular to each other?

that's why you are the uneducated village idiot.

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
No, the electron has mass and has a negative charge. Always has and
always will. Lloyd Paker

Can you explain with your electron and QM theory, the atomic volume of
uranium atom has only 12.5

12.5 what? Bushels?

, while that of hydrogen atom has 14.1,

Are you saying the radius of U is less than that of H? If so, you're so
wrong it's not even funny.

despite that uranium has 92 orbital electrons forming a large number of
electron shells? In this case QM theory denies electrons repulse each other?
Their energy becomes degenarated to lose repulsive force, and binds
themselves to make such a ridiculous Cooper pair electrons by absorbing
phonons? I sincerely advice you, please throw away such a fraudulent and
comic-like science as soon as possible, and start to study a real and true
science. newedana

It seems you don't have the periodic table of element atoms representing their atomic volumes. It is atomic number/density. newedana

It seems you don't have the periodic table of element atoms listing their atomic volumes. It is atomic weight/density. newedana

newedana wrote:
It seems you don't have the periodic table of element atoms listing their atomic volumes. It is atomic weight/density. newedana


Newedana,

check out this site:

http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~phys1/ja...ingCharge.html

(if you can't click it in your browser, click reply and then just
copy, paste it)

There you can see that at 0.95C, there is still electric field in
front of the charge particle or electron. The government spent
billions of dollars in particle accelerator constructions and
hiring the most brilliant scientists in the planet to
arrive at that finding. Can your Dr. Yoon with a $180 book claim
otherwise?

Come on. Some scientists spent 24 hours in the accelerators. If
there is no electric field in front of fast moving electrons and
they are all lagging behind, the experimental results would show.

Try to give reason a chance. Don't be like Bryan who is so illogic
that he can no longer understand any logic.

If you are in love with Dr. Yoon or his daughter and just want
to advertise his book. Well. Tell you what. Sell it at amazon
and it may become bestseller. If the nutty book "Final Theory"
by Mccutcheon can become a hit. So can Dr. Yoon.

Don't think about convincing people here so they would buy the
book. You will never be successful. Sci.physics has the most brillant
anti-cranks in the name of Bjorn and Wormley. Go to amazon.com instead.

I bought the book because I'm a crank analyzer and debunker so need
it in my library. Also for brainstorming.

Nuff said.

p6