Another blow to the global warming brigade

On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 23:22:36 -0500, wrote:


Art Deco wrote in message
...
Bob Officer wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:24:51 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks, Art Deco
wrote:

Bob Officer wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:27:17 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks, Art Deco
wrote:

http://peaceinspace.com wrote:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:10:14 -0700, Bob Officer

wrote:

Note: this is a admission of losing a discussion.

there's no other expectation when talking with a paid coffee boy,
lackey

It looks like Alexa is ready for her very own set of Star Trek
pajamas,
get to it.

Is someone feeding her these one liners?

Some of the alt.astronomers spilled over into the alien froups, so she
lifted a few of their lames. Alexa's never had an original thought,
ever.

I think Alexa is allergic to thinking.

I think Alexa got too close to the microwave oven.

Bob Officer is my best Rat!!!

___ |\_/| ___
/ \_ |` ' | _/ \
/ \/ \/ \
/ HEIL DECO \
\/\/\/\ ______ /\/\/\/
X X

Loyalty to me only!

Blow it out your ass Fart!


obsession and terrible art skills noted.

Jade

Dallas Credit Bureau wrote in message
...
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 23:22:36 -0500, wrote:


Art Deco wrote in message
...
Bob Officer wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 19:24:51 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks, Art Deco
wrote:

Bob Officer wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:27:17 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks, Art Deco
wrote:

http://peaceinspace.com wrote:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:10:14 -0700, Bob Officer

wrote:

Note: this is a admission of losing a discussion.

there's no other expectation when talking with a paid coffee boy,
lackey

It looks like Alexa is ready for her very own set of Star Trek
pajamas,
get to it.

Is someone feeding her these one liners?

Some of the alt.astronomers spilled over into the alien froups, so
she
lifted a few of their lames. Alexa's never had an original thought,
ever.

I think Alexa is allergic to thinking.

I think Alexa got too close to the microwave oven.

Bob Officer is my best Rat!!!

___ |\_/| ___
/ \_ |` ' | _/ \
/ \/ \/ \
/ HEIL DECO \
\/\/\/\ ______ /\/\/\/
X X

Loyalty to me only!

Blow it out your ass Fart!


obsession and terrible art skills noted.

Jade

Ass bandit noted.

"http://peaceinspace.com" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

As drawn by my daughter when she was four.

Depleted Uranium a tool to depopulate the world

Hi, Tequila Tits!

Jim

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:14:05 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"http://peaceinspace.com" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 21:34:35 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

As drawn by my daughter when she was four.

Depleted Uranium a tool to depopulate the world

Hi, Tequila Tits!

America's war on the web


While the US remains committed to hunting down al-Qaeda operatives, it is
now taking the battle to new fronts. Deep within the Pentagon, technologies
are being deployed to wage the war on terror on the internet, in newspapers
and even through mobile phones. Investigations editor Neil Mackay reports



IMAGINE a world where wars are fought over the internet; where TV broadcasts
and newspaper reports are designed by the military to confuse the
population; and where a foreign armed power can shut down your computer,
phone, radio or TV at will.
In 2006, we are just about to enter such a world. This is the age of
information warfare, and details of how this new military doctrine will
affect everyone on the planet are contained in a report, entitled The
Information Operations Roadmap, commissioned and approved by US secretary of
defence Donald Rumsfeld and seen by the Sunday Herald.

The Pentagon has already signed off $383 million to force through the
document’s recommendations by 2009. Military and intelligence sources in the
US talk of “a revolution in the concept of warfare”. The report orders three
new developments in America’s approach to warfa

lFirstly, the Pentagon says it will wage war against the internet in order
to dominate the realm of communications, prevent digital attacks on the US
and its allies, and to have the upper hand when launching cyber-attacks
against enemies.

lSecondly, psychological military operations, known as psyops, will be at
the heart of future military action. Psyops involve using any media – from
newspapers, books and posters to the internet, music, Blackberrys and
personal digital assistants (PDAs) – to put out black propaganda to assist
government and military strategy. Psyops involve the dissemination of lies
and fake stories and releasing information to wrong-foot the enemy.

lThirdly, the US wants to take control of the Earth’s electromagnetic
spectrum, allowing US war planners to dominate mobile phones, PDAs, the web,
radio, TV and other forms of modern communication. That could see entire
countries denied access to telecommunications at the flick of a switch by
America.

Freedom of speech advocates are horrified at this new doctrine, but military
planners and members of the intelligence community embrace the idea as a
necessary development in modern combat.

Human rights lawyer John Scott, who chairs the Scottish Centre for Human
Rights, said: “This is an unwelcome but natural development of what we have
seen. I find what is said in this document to be frightening, and it needs
serious parliamentary scrutiny.”

Crispin Black – who has worked for the Joint Intelligence Committee, and has
been an Army lieutenant colonel, a military intelligence officer, a member
of the Defence Intelligence Staff and a Cabinet Office intelligence analyst
who briefed Number 10 – said he broadly supported the report as it tallied
with the Pentagon’s over-arching vision for “full spectrum dominance” in all
military matters.

“I’m all for taking down al-Qaeda websites. Shutting down enemy propaganda
is a reasonable course of action. Al-Qaeda is very good at [information
warfare on the internet], so we need to catch up. The US needs to lift its
game,” he said.

This revolution in information warfare is merely an extension of the
politics of the “neoconservative” Bush White House. Even before getting into
power, key players in Team Bush were planning total military and political
domination of the globe. In September 2000, the now notorious document
Rebuilding America’s Defences – written by the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC), a think-tank staffed by some of the Bush presidency’s
leading lights – said that America needed a “blueprint for maintaining US
global pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power-rival, and shaping
the international security order in line with American principles and
interests”.

The PNAC was founded by Dick Cheney, the vice-president; Donald Rumsfeld,
the defence secretary; Bush’s younger brother, Jeb; Paul Wolfowitz, once
Rumsfeld’s deputy and now head of the World Bank; and Lewis Libby, Cheney’s
former chief of staff, now indicted for perjury in America.

Rebuilding America’s Defences also spoke of taking control of the internet.
A heavily censored version of the document was released under Freedom of
Information legislation to the National Security Archive at George
Washington University in the US.

The report admits the US is vulnerable to electronic warfare. “Networks are
growing faster than we can defend them,” the report notes. “The
sophistication and capability of … nation states to degrade system and
network operations are rapidly increasing.”

T he report says the US military’s first priority is that the “department
[of defence] must be prepared to ‘fight the net’”. The internet is seen in
much the same way as an enemy state by the Pentagon because of the way it
can be used to propagandise, organise and mount electronic attacks on
crucial US targets. Under the heading “offensive cyber operations”, two
pages outlining possible operations are blacked out.

Next, the Pentagon focuses on electronic warfare, saying it must be elevated
to the heart of US military war planning. It will “provide maximum control
of the electromagnetic spectrum, denying, degrading, disrupting or
destroying the full spectrum of communications equipment … it is
increasingly important that our forces dominate the electromagnetic spectrum
with attack capabilities”. Put simply, this means US forces having the power
to knock out any or all forms of telecommunications on the planet.



After electronic warfare, the US war planners turn their attention to
psychological operations: “Military forces must be better prepared to use
psyops in support of military operations.” The State Department, which
carries out US diplomatic functions, is known to be worried that the rise of
such operations could undermine American diplomacy if uncovered by foreign
states. Other examples of information war listed in the report include the
creation of “Truth Squads” to provide public information when negative
publicity, such as the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, hits US operations, and
the establishment of “Humanitarian Road Shows”, which will talk up American
support for democracy and freedom.

The Pentagon also wants to target a “broader set of select foreign media and
audiences”, with $161m set aside to help place pro-US articles in overseas
media.

http://www.sundayherald.com/54975

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:18:42 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:37:25 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 05:09:14 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 22:08:51 -0700, Bob Officer
wrote:

Alexa

You should be asking George Bush, he's in communication with god right now,

Can you prove that he isn't?

Depleted Uranium a tool to depopulate the world
by Sepp Hasslberger Sunday, Apr. 09, 2006 at 1:32 PM
War, Epidemics, Depopulation - Rough Times Ahead


A simple "No" would have been sufficient, ScreedLexa.
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 02:14:41 -0700, Bob Officer
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:23:20 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Vanilla
Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 03:28:07 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 19:22:31 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:54:22 GMT, "http://peaceinspace.com"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:38:02 -0600, Art Deco wrote:

Indeed.

Your resolution to human extinction is...........?????????????

I'd say a resolution would be imprudent at this juncture.

Then why did you bother asking for one, ****head?

You have no sense of humor what so ever, rhetorical question withstanding.

You keep kkklaiming there is no answer, and that you know what it is.
Is that your idea of "rhetoric"?

Notice the statement (it is usually a change of direction of the
debate) taking human extinction as an agreed upon point. There is not
any discussion about the subject prior to her introduction of it.

Then she follows up with an insult/ad hominem attack. This is a one
two fallacy of a person without a firm grasp of the subject manner,
lately also called a chicken little syndrome.

Indeed. She's not terribly bright, to put it kindly.
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.