![]() |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr John Stockton wrote: JRS: In article .com , dated Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:03:00, seen in news:sci.space.policy, Tom Cuddihy posted : [jrs] Thus if all the energy that shines on the Moon from the Sun were used, it would take about 100 years to get enough. Check that. At 1 AU, the sun puts out an average of 1380 w/m^2. That's a known number recorded from the thousands of satellites in orbit. That means the sunlit portion of the moon receives pi*r^2*pwrdens= pi*(1.73E6)^2*1380=1.27E22 watts. So it's actually much better than you thought--2E26J/1.3E22w = 15380 s= 4.3 hrs. pi*(1.73E6)^2*1380 ~ 3 * 3E12 * 1380 ~ 1.3E16 watts; so multiply your 4.3 hours by 1E6 - 500 years or so. dratted microsoft calculator! wonder what I punched in wrong... cuddihy |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Davis wrote:
Mike Combs wrote: For only the fortunate confluence of two conditions: 1) There's a heck of a lot of money to be made off of some space business which inevitably requires the presense of large numbers of people in space. Can you specify which large, multinational corporations have come to this conclusion? Virgin And off which space businesses they hope to make a heck of a lot of money? tourism 2) Rand and I have the qualifications to make sending us up a good investment for the corporation or consortium (the odds much favoring Rand, since I'm not presently working, or have ever worked, in a space-related field). Indeed? Which large, multinational corporations and/or consortia have made you or Rand or *anyone* offers of a job in space? McDonnell Douglas. They paid Charlie Walker to fly into space three times, and they paid NASA for his trip aboard the Space Shuttle too. These are probably not the answers you're expecting, but they're the answers to your questions nonetheless. Mike ----- Michael Kent Apple II Forever!! St. Peters, MO |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Kent" wrote in message
... Virgin snip tourism snip McDonnell Douglas. They paid Charlie Walker to fly into space three times, and they paid NASA for his trip aboard the Space Shuttle too. These are probably not the answers you're expecting, but they're the answers to your questions nonetheless. And one might well argue that these represent, at best, embryonic efforts at (manned) space commercialization. But the point remains that one can't even point to embryonic examples of national governments funding colonization efforts undertaken "for hope, not for cash". -- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Member of the National Non-sequitur Society. We may not make much sense, but we do like pizza. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Combs" mikecombs wrote:
"Michael Kent" wrote in message ... McDonnell Douglas. They paid Charlie Walker to fly into space three times, and they paid NASA for his trip aboard the Space Shuttle too. These are probably not the answers you're expecting, but they're the answers to your questions nonetheless. And one might well argue that these represent, at best, embryonic efforts at (manned) space commercialization. Embryos often grow into larger creatures. In fact, were it not for the merger with Boeing, I'd expect McDonnell Douglas to be in the thick of things in the commercial space arena. But the point remains that one can't even point to embryonic examples of national governments funding colonization efforts undertaken "for hope, not for cash". True, but not relavant to the initial questions. They were based on corporate entities spending money on manned space activities. Mike ----- Michael Kent Apple II Forever!! St. Peters, MO |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Kent" wrote in message
... "Mike Combs" mikecombs wrote: And one might well argue that these represent, at best, embryonic efforts at (manned) space commercialization. Embryos often grow into larger creatures. Enthusiastic agreement. But the point remains that one can't even point to embryonic examples of national governments funding colonization efforts undertaken "for hope, not for cash". True, but not relavant to the initial questions. They were based on corporate entities spending money on manned space activities. I had understood the initial question to be, "Should we terraform Mars?". To what initial question do you refer? -- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Member of the National Non-sequitur Society. We may not make much sense, but we do like pizza. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - April 30, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 30th 04 03:55 PM |
Space Calendar - March 26, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 26th 04 04:05 PM |
Space Calendar - March 26, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 0 | March 26th 04 04:05 PM |
Farewell to the Earth and the Moon - ESA's Mars Express Successfully Tests Its Instruments | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 04:08 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |