FR vs. GR and a century of experiments

doug wrote:

So you are too lazy to do any work. Willing stupidity is
not a way for you to learn anything. No wonder you are a failure
and will remain a failure.

I am willing learning the whole GPS but GR and its frame dragging can be
silently dismissed. The maths required for predicting FR time dilation
without a simulator will be complex enough.

FR is only numerology.

It doesn't matter how you define it, all that matters is that it gets
more accurate predictions.

doug wrote:

Then you will remain stupid.

You can't, you can't; just admit it.

[...]

But it will not since it is numerology.

You owe me a cheeseburger if I win.

On Oct 6, 12:09*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

You're welcome. Hope you learned something from the exercise.

I still can't believe no one is willing mentoring FR.

And I still can't believe you say you are going elsewhere and yet you
are still hanging around.

Why do you think you are entitled to someone mentoring you and your
ambitions?


BTW as we can see Joseph A. Rybczyk also found the momentum correction
relying only on time dilation, which is interesting:http://www.mrelativity.net/MBriefs/A...iscrepancy%20i...

PD wrote:

And I still can't believe you say you are going elsewhere and yet you
are still hanging around.

Because I want to make sure you understand the situation.

Why do you think you are entitled to someone mentoring you and your
ambitions?

So you admit you are blinded by irrational thoughts.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

PD wrote:


You're welcome. Hope you learned something from the exercise.


I still can't believe no one is willing mentoring FR.

We tried, you were too stupid to learn.


BTW as we can see Joseph A. Rybczyk also found the momentum correction
relying only on time dilation, which is interesting:
http://www.mrelativity.net/MBriefs/A... lativity.htm

On Oct 6, 1:16*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

And I still can't believe you say you are going elsewhere and yet you
are still hanging around.

Because I want to make sure you understand the situation.

Why? Why is it important to you?


Why do you think you are entitled to someone mentoring you and your
ambitions?

So you admit you are blinded by irrational thoughts.

Not at all. Why do you think you are entitled to mentoring?

And what do you find irrational about GR and SR?

doug wrote:

Yes, we already understand that you do not know any science
and are not interested in learning anything.

I understand you cannot handle situations controverting your qualifications.

Phil just makes up random lies when he is trying to hide
from a question.

No this was a direct answer since Paul does not like the idea of anyone
having what is perceived to be ambitions.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


We tried, you were too stupid to learn.


If there any way that can happen without learning any SR or GR then I am
interested.

So you are too lazy to do any work. Willing stupidity is
not a way for you to learn anything. No wonder you are a failure
and will remain a failure.

I guarantee FR will predict the right answers having a
precision proportional to the precision of the fudge factor of the solar
system.

FR is only numerology.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


So you are too lazy to do any work. Willing stupidity is
not a way for you to learn anything. No wonder you are a failure
and will remain a failure.


I am willing learning the whole GPS but GR and its frame dragging can be
silently dismissed.

Then you will remain stupid.

The maths required for predicting FR time dilation
without a simulator will be complex enough.

FR is a joke.

FR is only numerology.


It doesn't matter how you define it, all that matters is that it gets
more accurate predictions.

But it will not since it is numerology.

On Oct 6, 1:45*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

Yes, we already understand that you do not know any science
and are not interested in learning anything.

I understand you cannot handle situations controverting your qualifications.

Phil just makes up random lies when he is trying to hide
from a question.

No this was a direct answer since Paul does not like the idea of anyone
having what is perceived to be ambitions.

Oh, I'm all for you having ambitions. I'm also all for people being
motivated to act on their ambitions. I'm a little less sympathetic
with people who say they have ambitions but expect to be mentored in
their ambitions in the venue of their choice, even if that venue is an
open-access discussion group and not a teaching facility. That is, I'm
not so moved by emotional midgets who whine, "But I don't WANNA do it
that way! I WANNA do it MY WAY, and I WANT someone to HELP ME to do it
MY WAY. WAAAH!"