A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old April 22nd 09, 02:43 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.



Derek Lyons wrote:

But, as I stated above, the real problem isn't critical failures. The
real problem is the accumulation of non critical failures steadily
reducing performance while increasing headaches.


In a lot of the Mars flight scenarios you see two or more identical
spacecraft sent on the mission, so that in case one fails, the crew of
the failed ship can transfer to the other one.
This would work fine if it weren't for the problem that both ships might
well have the same fault in their design.

Pat
  #102  
Old April 23rd 09, 05:33 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Marvin the Martian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 655
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:42:21 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

Marvin the Martian wrote:

:On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:09:53 -0400, Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) wrote: :
: "Marvin the Martian" wrote in message :
... : On Mon, 20 Apr
2009 14:56:51 +0000, Derek Lyons wrote: :
:
: Reading the ALSJ, you can see that nearly every flight had multiple
: small malfunctions that never made the news and that we rarely
discuss : here. (And of the same type I encountered.) Those, not
big : spectacular failures, are your real problem on a years long
mission. :
: D,
:
: That's why you do failure modes analysis and develop fault trees.
You : EXPECT some failures, given the number of systems. A good
engineer : accounts for them. Losers give up. :
: Yes and realists realize that the problem is a lot harder than you
give : it credit for.
:
:Your loser attitude is noted.
:

As is your intellectually bankrupt attitude.


You're just a poser, really. You've never heard of fault tolerance,
failure modes analysis, and fault trees. You just come to the usenet and
say "no can't be done" with this "not invented here" attitude.

I came here to fish for people interested in Mars for my website.

You are not invited.

: With enough money and effort, sure it could have been done, but while
: the effort might have been there, they money wasn't and isn't. :
:The point of the thread is to say it should be done. You're big on
:circular logic and defeatism.
:

Laying golden eggs would also be nice. Lots of things 'should' be done
that simply aren't that simple to actually do.

Have you ever had to engineer a major system?


It is what I do for a living...

What a loser.


  #103  
Old April 23rd 09, 05:37 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Marvin the Martian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 655
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:09:32 +0000, Derek Lyons wrote:


My point is that system anaylsis and fault trees are not magic wands,
and that logistics is still very much a black art.


Yeah, yeah yeah. And computers are run by gremlins in the box. You've
never heard of it. Hell, you can't even spell analysis.

This trying to sound smart by saying it can't be done is absurd. You
don't have a clue.



  #104  
Old April 23rd 09, 08:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,999
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

Marvin the Martian wrote:

I came here to fish for people interested in Mars for my website.


As they say, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar. But the
bull**** you pedal might attract a few too.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #105  
Old April 23rd 09, 08:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,999
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

Marvin the Martian wrote:

This trying to sound smart by saying it can't be done is absurd.


Learn to ****ing read you cretin. Nobody has said it can't be done.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #106  
Old April 23rd 09, 09:25 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

Marvin the Martian wrote:

:On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:42:21 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: Marvin the Martian wrote:
:
: :On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:09:53 -0400, Greg D. Moore \(Strider\) wrote: :
: : "Marvin the Martian" wrote in message :
: ... : On Mon, 20 Apr
: 2009 14:56:51 +0000, Derek Lyons wrote: :
: :
: : Reading the ALSJ, you can see that nearly every flight had multiple
: : small malfunctions that never made the news and that we rarely
: discuss : here. (And of the same type I encountered.) Those, not
: big : spectacular failures, are your real problem on a years long
: mission. :
: : D,
: :
: : That's why you do failure modes analysis and develop fault trees.
: You : EXPECT some failures, given the number of systems. A good
: engineer : accounts for them. Losers give up. :
: : Yes and realists realize that the problem is a lot harder than you
: give : it credit for.
: :
: :Your loser attitude is noted.
: :
:
: As is your intellectually bankrupt attitude.
:
:You're just a poser, really. You've never heard of fault tolerance,
:failure modes analysis, and fault trees. You just come to the usenet and
:say "no can't be done" with this "not invented here" attitude.
:

I do engineering for a living. You've obviously never had to engineer
a complex fault-tolerant system.

:
:I came here to fish for people interested in Mars for my website.
:

In other words, you're just a troll.

:
:You are not invited.
:

That's nice. Tell me other things I'm not invited to do, like poke
myself in the eye with a hot poker or hit myself in the nuts with a
hammer.

: : With enough money and effort, sure it could have been done, but while
: : the effort might have been there, they money wasn't and isn't. :
: :The point of the thread is to say it should be done. You're big on
: :circular logic and defeatism.
: :
:
: Laying golden eggs would also be nice. Lots of things 'should' be done
: that simply aren't that simple to actually do.
:
: Have you ever had to engineer a major system?
:
:It is what I do for a living...
:

Apparently not, if you believe what you've been claiming.

:
:What a loser.
:

Nice of you to self-identify.

--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine
  #108  
Old April 23rd 09, 05:08 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,999
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

Fred J. McCall wrote:

(Derek Lyons) wrote:

:Marvin the Martian wrote:
:
:This trying to sound smart by saying it can't be done is absurd.
:
:Learn to ****ing read you cretin. Nobody has said it can't be done.
:

Give it up, Derek. He seems to be just another loon, self-obsessed
with his own ideas.


Yeah, I'd pretty much decided that last night's exchange would be the
last.

He's not interested in anyone who actually thinks. They're heretics,
you see, questioning his sermonizing from his own personal mount.


D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #110  
Old April 23rd 09, 09:30 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Marvin the Martian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 655
Default Space Policy: Why Mars should be our top priority.

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:05:01 +0000, Derek Lyons wrote:

Marvin the Martian wrote:

I came here to fish for people interested in Mars for my website.


As they say, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar. But the
bull**** you pedal might attract a few too.

D.


People. Not apes.



--
http://OnToMars.org For discussions about Mars and Mars colonization
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sci.space.policy impact on policy John Schilling Policy 4 June 23rd 06 02:02 AM
Shuttle Replacement Needs to Become a National Priority!!! jonathan Policy 70 August 15th 05 06:33 PM
"Space policy and the size of the space shuttle fleet" MasterShrink Space Shuttle 0 December 26th 04 05:35 AM
Spaceguard-Priority List Matthew D. Mills Amateur Astronomy 1 March 4th 04 04:28 AM
Mars Exploration and the Search for Life is a Priority Says UK ScienceMinister (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 December 29th 03 12:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.