![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Clayton" wrote in message om... So the method they used is 3/3, I say we land everything on Mars that way. Forget those totally rocket controlled descents, this bouncing ball method is proven. I can't wait until we start bring some samples back and maybe doing some seismic stuff. Jason That'd not a valid line of thought. Air bags appear work very well for landing zones that are flat and relatively clear of pointy things. If you want to land in a place with more interesting topography, bags may not be the best answer. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess it would be a problem in a canyon, although if we are able to bring
the costs down to where we can send numerous rovers, then we could risk having the rover land in a canyon with a relatively wide valley floor. Another thing, I have seen some incredibly high resolution sat. images and I am sure the CIA folks have even better stuff. Why don't we have that kind of resolution from our orbiting spacecraft there? I know we spend enough money on them to have the best stuff. "Dosco Jones" wrote in message link.net... "Jason Clayton" wrote in message om... So the method they used is 3/3, I say we land everything on Mars that way. Forget those totally rocket controlled descents, this bouncing ball method is proven. I can't wait until we start bring some samples back and maybe doing some seismic stuff. Jason That'd not a valid line of thought. Air bags appear work very well for landing zones that are flat and relatively clear of pointy things. If you want to land in a place with more interesting topography, bags may not be the best answer. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Clayton" wrote in message news ![]() I guess it would be a problem in a canyon, although if we are able to bring the costs down to where we can send numerous rovers, then we could risk having the rover land in a canyon with a relatively wide valley floor. Another thing, I have seen some incredibly high resolution sat. images and I am sure the CIA folks have even better stuff. Why don't we have that kind of resolution from our orbiting spacecraft there? I know we spend enough money on them to have the best stuff. "Dosco Jones" wrote in message link.net... "Jason Clayton" wrote in message om... So the method they used is 3/3, I say we land everything on Mars that way. Forget those totally rocket controlled descents, this bouncing ball method is proven. I can't wait until we start bring some samples back and maybe doing some seismic stuff. Jason That'd not a valid line of thought. Air bags appear work very well for landing zones that are flat and relatively clear of pointy things. If you want to land in a place with more interesting topography, bags may not be the best answer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Clayton" wrote in message news ![]() Another thing, I have seen some incredibly high resolution sat. images and I am sure the CIA folks have even better stuff. Why don't we have that kind of resolution from our orbiting spacecraft there? I know we spend enough money on them to have the best stuff. One significant limitation is size. One of our best orbital intelligence assets is the Advanced KH-11 "Crystal" type spysat. It's roughly 50 feet long by 15 feet in diameter, with a dry weight of ten metric tons. Keyhole has a primary mirror that is at least 7.5 feet in diameter with a best guess ground target resolution of 10 to 12 centimeters. Think of it as a Hubble Space Telescope with a maneuvering rocket stuck on one end. Getting a package the size of Hubble to Mars isn't something we can easily do right now. Dosco |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jason Clayton" wrote in message news ![]() Another thing, I have seen some incredibly high resolution sat. images and I am sure the CIA folks have even better stuff. Why don't we have that kind of resolution from our orbiting spacecraft there? I know we spend enough money on them to have the best stuff. Spysats tend to be about the size of a school bus. Much too heavy and large to send to Mars with the launch capablilities and budgets we now have or will have for such things in the forseeable future. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carsten
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Carsten" wrote in message ... Carsten We aim to please. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:59:48 -0500, "George" carved in
granite... "Carsten" wrote in message k... Carsten We aim to please. You aim too, please. ![]() Carl -- "Volunteer emergency personel are like toilet paper- no one realizes how valuable they are until they're needed." -- Coalbunny -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George" wrote in message . ..
"Carsten" wrote in message ... Carsten We aim to please. Ah, George, George, ...George, ... ' Who ?' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |